Karpal perplexed by CJs letter on copycat judge

Karpal Singh says he wants the stately elect of exploration as well as the tribunal opposite the 'copycat' decider as well as is suprised by CJ's minute to him that there is no box opposite Abdul Malik.

PETALING JAYA: A nonplussed Bukit Gelugor MP as well as veteran counsel Karpal Singh has denied that he had asked for 'copycat' decider Abdul Malik Ishak to be investigated.

"What we wish is the stately elect of exploration (RCI) as well as the tribunal set up underneath Article 125 (3) of the Federal Constitution to enquire into the piracy allegations opposite Malik underneath the laws that existed in 2000.

"For the record we have not done any censure to Chief Justice (Arifin Zakaria) in propinquity to bungle upon the part of Malik," he pronounced in the make the difference today.

Karpal was responding to the minute that he perceived from Chief Justice Arifin Zakaria where the latter settled that Karpal's censure had no consequence as well as has been discharged in accordance to Section thirteen (1) of Judges' Code of Ethics 2009.

According to Karpal, he had created the minute to Malik upon August 22, indicating his intention to pierce the motion opposite him in parliament underneath Article 127 for bungle in propinquity to the plagiarism.

"There was no reply from Malik. we was! promote d to write an additional minute to him upon Sept twenty-nine saying that as was no reply to my allegation, it left me with no pick but to pierce the substantive motion opposite him.

"I additionally settled that we was fluctuating the minute antiquated August 22 to the Chief Justice as well as boss of the Court of Appeal," Karpal said.

CJ: Claim has no merit
CJ Arifin duration pronounced the censure joining Abdul Malik with plagiarising the Singapore court settlement in 2000 had no merit.

A make the difference from the Chief Justice's Office released by Arifin's special officer I, Che Wan Zaidi Che Wan Ibrahim, pronounced the decision was reached after investigations as well as the contention with Appeal Court boss Md Raus Sharif.

"The CJ carried out an investigation. Based upon his commentary as well as after deliberating with the Court of Appeal boss in accordance with Section 13(1) of the Judges Code of Ethics 2009, the CJ is of the opinion that Karpal's allegations of piracy by the Appeal Court decider has no consequence as well as the censure is hereby rejected," pronounced Che Wan Zaidi.

He pronounced the CJ perceived the censure minute antiquated Sept 29, 2011 from Karpal that claimed that an Appeal Court decider had plagiarised the settlement of the Singapore court judge.

Karpal had been strictly informed of the make the difference in the minute from the CJ's office, pronounced Che Wan Zaidi.

'Malik has 7 days'

Karpal pronounced that he perceived the reply from the CJ upon Oct thirteen asking for 'more specific information' in propinquity to his allegations.

"I ! responde d (to the CJ) by minute antiquated Oct 27 saying that the law apportion at that time, Rais Yatim, had publicly settled that he knew about the allegations of piracy as well as was aware of the investigations (by the Singapore judiciary)," he said.

Karpal went upon to add that upon December 7 he had again created to the CJ indicating that the parliamentary motions that he put up opposite Malik had lapsed (on December 1) as well as that "he had no pick but to seek alternative measures."

"Following this we wrote an open minute antiquated December 27 to Malik job upon him to step down or record the fit opposite me for defamation.

"I gave him 7 days to reply, failing that we would take it as the open admission that he was guilty of plagiarism," pronounced Karpal.

Karpal, had in October, revealed that the Singapore law had identified Malek as having plagiarised the visualisation of Singapore High Court decider GP Selvam in 2000.

Malik was found to have copied Selvam's visualisation upon the copyright box while portion as Johor High Court decider in 2000.

Karpal had progressing in parliament called for Malik's evident abdication saying it would save the Malaysian law from serve embarrassment. Malik is currently the Court of Appeal judge.

Read More @ Source

"3 PM Bayangan" Lambang Tiada Kesepakatan Dalam Pakatan Pembangkang

KUALA LUMPUR, 6 Okt - Ahli Parlimen Sekijang, Datuk Baharum Haji Mohamed berkata, kabinet dan Perdana Menteri bayangan pakatan pembangkang jika mereka berkuasa pada Pilihan Raya Umum ke thirteen nanti diibaratkan sebagai satu mimpi ngeri kepada rakyat. Ini kerana kata beliau cadangan "tiga Perdana Menteri Bayangan Pakatan Pembangkang" membuktikan tiada persepakata! n antara mereka. "Saya percaya, jika siapa sahaja yang akan dilantik, pastinya akan ditarik semula oleh "rakan" mereka sendiri, yang akhirnya akan berlaku pergolakan dan merugikan rakyat. "Contohnya dalam soal Hukum Hudud, Pas seolah-olah nampak macam memperjuangkan tetapi bagi DAP, mereka tidak boleh menerima. Ini joke kita lihat, memang tidak ada kesepakatan dalam hala tuju perjuangan mereka," ujarnya kepada UMNO-Online di Lobi Parlimen di sini. Beliau percaya, kabinet dan Perdana Menteri Bayangan ini sekadar satu gimik yangcubadiketengahkan untuk menarik perhatian rakyat, khususnya menarik perhatian daripada masyarakat bukan Melayu untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri. "Apa yang kita buat selama ini dalam Barisan Nasional, kita lebih penting kepada majoriti. Contohnya kalau Melayu majoriti, bermakna Melayulah yang akan menjadi Perdana Menteri malah kita joke sejak merdeka sampai hari ini, BN tidak menghadapi masalah. "Kita boleh membangunkan negara kita, kita boleh memberikan pelbagai kemudahan kepada rakyat dan kita tengok sejak kita merdeka sampai hari ini, kita tidak menghadapi masalah yang kita hadapi dalam membangunkan ...

Video Rating: 0 / 5

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz