
The elementary meaning is which a Agong is a guardian of ALL Malaysians, as well as not only a Malays! So since do leaders similar to Ibrahim Ali keep harping upon this Article 153 as if it is a dedicated sustenance for a Malays only? Are they idiots who can't read?
By Daniel John Jambun
Datuk Ibrahim Ali only came up with a gem of law when he pronounced there is no need for a Race Relations Act if people behave. "If everyone behaves, if nobody touches upon (Article) 153, nobody questions this as well as that, condemns this as well as that, as well as during a same time recognises a inconsistency of wealth in between Malays as well as non-Malays, you do not think you need any a single more Act," he said. How unequivocally true!
Out of so most idiotic statements you have heard from domestic jokers, this a single is a genuine gem of truth. The funny thing is which Ibrahim thinks he pronounced something unequivocally shining when in actuality it is elementary truism (truth which doesn't need to be said). Yes, you wouldn't need any law for which make a difference if everyone behaves. We wouldn't need a police, a security guards, a magistrates as well as judges, nor a prisons if there were no criminals. We wouldn't need a Speaker in Parliament if every Member of Parliament can handle as well as not become rowdy or unresponsive comedians creation fun of women.
But who have been unequivocally working badly in Malaysia? Who have been those doubt this as well as that, condemning this as well as that? you guess only Ibrahim is a luckiest guy in a country since he makes all sorts of factious as well a! s extrem ist statements, misbehaving in a way which he should be arrested as well as charged in court, though nobody touches him, no inhabitant leaders even brave to ask him to close up. Of a Race Relations Act he pronounced which "We will see a breeze of a Act. If it is great for a country, you have no complaint supporting it," he said. "But whatever Act is introduced ... it contingency not intrude upon (Article) 153, Islam as a central sacrament of a Federation, Bahasa Melayu as a inhabitant language, a government of a Malay Rulers."
We all know which there is no question about Islam being a central religion, Bahasa Melayu as a inhabitant language or a government of a Malay Rulers. What you would precisely preferto speak about is Article 153. It is unequivocally overpowering to keep hearing domestic leaders verbalise about Article 153 as if it belongs only to a Malays.
If you review a essay in a entirety you will be reminded unequivocally clearly which it is not a insurance for Malay rights, as well as neither has it got to do with any so-called social contract. It says which a Yang di-Pertuan Agong is responsible for defence a special in front of of a Malays AND a locals of Sabah as well as Sarawak, AND a bona fide seductiveness of alternative communities. The elementary meaning is which a Agong is a guardian of ALL Malaysians, as well as not only a Malays! So since do leaders similar to Ibrahim Ali keep harping upon this Article 153 as if it is a dedicated sustenance for a Malays only? Are they idiots who can't read? Or have been they realistic morons who upon role handle similar to idiots for a role of creation domestic mileage over something which has zero to do with what they have been saying?
you fully await Senior Christian leader Reverend Dr Eu Hong Seng who pronounced which Article 153 had been used to brag others, as well as which it was something which "needed somebody to contend it." He told an online portal he had zero to fe! ar notwi thstanding a extreme greeting from various Malay groups as well as denials by a government which Christians or any minority group had been sidelined. He described Perkasa's call for him to be investigated for mutiny an example of fear-mongering. It is time somebody pronounced as well as stood up bravely about it. The Deputy Prime Minister strike behind as well as pronounced a sustenance was never used to brag anyone. But has he not heard radicals similar to Ibrahim Ali abusing a sustenance all a time? How do a non-Malays feel when radicals speak about Malay supremacy or when a DPM himself pronounced he is a Malay first as well as Malaysian second?
The radical groups who idolize Article 153 as if it gives a Malays special rights, privileges, positions as well as bullying energy need to be told to stop a negative attitude. What you see in a Article is something unequivocally positive for Malaysians as a whole since to me it is a clever unifying provision, underneath which you have been stable by a King as next to partners in Malaysia. It is NOT a sustenance to give a Malay superior position. It doesn't give a Muslim a right to brag alternative people as well as alternative religions. Under this sustenance a Malays have next to "special position" with a locals of a Borneo States. Under it, a Malays have been upon next to in front of with a Ibans, a Penans, Bajaus as well as a Kadazandusuns. We have a same special in front of of a Malays, so you can discuss it a Malays similar to Ibrahim Ali to close up as well as grow up if you want to.
Advisor, UK-Based Human Rights foundation Malaysia
Read More @ Source Pembangkang Usah Jual Temberang Bajet 2012, Tunaikan Dulu Janji Manifesto

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment