January 1, 2012
January 9, 2012:A Repeat of Paulian (Augustine) Judgment?
by Terence Netto
COMMENT As domestic theatre, Anwar Ibrahim's 18-stop campaign pitch through several
states forward of a January 9 verdict in his sodomy hearing is sure to fool around to overflow audiences, judging from a distance of crowds that have attended his appearances upon a ceramah circuit a last month or so.
And right divided with Police as well as protesters opposite a 'Free Anwar Campaign' during work in Kelantan as well as Sabah respectively, obtruding identical to flies during mealtimes, Anwar's debate pitch is sure to beget a broadside as well as crowds that should keep it in a headlines.
With a verdict in Sodomy II unresolved identical to a proverbial long knife of Damocles over Malaysia's budding minister-in-waiting, audience-size during his ceramah as well as their appetite for what he says have been sure to be whetted by oddity about his fate.
Few things have been as manly a magnet for a extraordinary as a specter of impending severe threat upon someone who flaunts defiance. As a palm of judicial predestine closes in upon Anwar, a opposition leader's peripatetic review to a courtroom of open perspective resembles identical odysseys of a complicated epoch in politics.
In these episodes, charismatic leaders seen as embodiments of causes that ring across
inhabitant boundaries, find themselves confronting overwhelming state-power opposite that they have had only their seductiveness to a rank as well as file to offer as defence.
As assorted times in their careers, Burmese opposition personality Aung San Suu Kyi, a late Philippine oppositionist Benigno Aquino, Polish traffic union personality Lech Walesa, as well as Czech playwright Vaclav Havel were in situations identical to Anwar's present position.
The preference any faced was either incarceration by a forces of hang-up or anointment by a rank as well as file as their leader-liberator of inhabitant destiny. The historical impulse is electric when personal as well as inhabitant dilemmas have been so starkly juxtaposed.
Credibility gap
In a courtroom of open opinion, a case opposite Anwar in Sodomy II has met with a same credibility gap that a sex video purporting to uncover him in a contract with a sex worker had already encountered: A wish of open idea in a authenticity.
Details identical to a timing of a recover of a sex video as well as a temperament of a people concerned in a buying as well as distribution have been more notable in review than during a time of a emergence.
Sodomy II was limping along in a High Court, several months after a sensational fanfare of a opening in January 2010, when a sex video was released.
It soon acquired a aura of a life-support machine being bending up to a hearing that had become moribund.
After a sensational start, Sodomy II entered a long distance in that issues of due process, specifically a stint of it to a counterclaim a intent of several challenges by Anwar's lawyers became a central point of a whole trial.
When a hearing reaches that sta! ge, a hi therto riveted audience may remove a concentration as well as a seductiveness progressively falls away. The reason for a flapping divided of seductiveness from Sodomy II was that all of a earlier focus, particularly to a Muslim audience (towards whom this case was wholly aimed), revolved around a subject of "Did he do it?"
Audiences driven by that unaccompanied concentration have been not unduly concerned with procedural issues. But procedural issues have been what unequivocally make a difference in law.
Just as science became complicated as an experimental routine for a acknowledgment of truths determined by systematic methods of inquiry, so law as a complicated source became bona fide when probity was seen to be a result of whatever only procedures had led to.
A wish of only procedures was what Anwar's counterclaim was intense in protesting as Sodomy II proceeded even as open seductiveness in a hearing waned as it declined in to a cockpit of procedural issues.
Symptom of a inhabitant malaise
In a interim, however, Anwar did not stay still. He campaigned upon a vocalization circuit, taking his case opposite various deteriorations in a body politic to a country's last arbiter: a people who will a ones who will opinion as well as ultimately decide.
Those deteriorations a solid drip-drip of crime as well as abuse of power, as well as a opacity of a electoral routine played out in a credentials to his sodomy trial.
Soon a hearing became only an additional symptom of a inhabitant malaise that a opposition personality has been vituperation opposite since his travails began after his sacking from UMNO as well as a supervision in Sep 1998.
Thus, it is not farfetched to say a last arbiters of a inhabitant condition have been no longer most concerned with a verdict to be delivered upon Jan! uary 9.< /p>
They have been more extraordinary to see how Anwar is comporting himself underneath threat of a Damoclean long knife that is why his 18-stop debate pitch is headed for high assemblage as well as what is right divided becoming utterly clear forward police attention as well as trammels.
www.malaysiakini.com
Like this:
Forum Sinar: Khairy, Nasrudin, Dr Asri Mengulas Isu Video Seks Anwar Ibrahim Part 1
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment