After a day of open shellacking over remarks upon homosexuality and a Constitution made by Jamil Khir Baharom, a army ubiquitous of ulama who became a apportion for Islam and not a apportion of law has lonesome his jerk by blaming a newspaper.
He didn't contend he was wrong about homosexuality and a Constitution. He didn't contend he was wrong to indicate which a Penal Code was a Constitution. He pronounced he thinks he was misquoted. He thinks?
Malaysian Insider
So it's all right with him to pull a censure upon a contributor and a newspaper? Is which how ministers of religion take shortcoming for their actions?
And what about Nazri Aziz, a actual apportion of law? This is what he pronounced when perplexing to cover a jerk of his cabinet colleague:
The Sun
Nazri Aziz positively sounded as if he believed a inform was true. And Nazri Aziz positively seems to have believed Jamil pronounced that. Of course, Jamil now says he was misquoted. Was this prior to or after Nazri had a word with him?
Let's then look during an additional example of Jamil's supposed thinking:
Malaysian Insider
That's complete rubbish.
Stop lying to a public
Section 377 simply says anal sex or verbal sex have been not allowed. Men upon men, or group upon women, or women upon men, anal sex and verbal sex is not allowed. It does not contend anything about homosexuality and it does not contend group cannot have passionate family with! alterna tive men.
Now, discuss it us again, how does a army turn a burro into a general? The same way jackasses become ministers?
God protect us all if we ever go to war. For sure, a jackasses won't.
No comments:
Post a Comment