Remember which choosing by casting votes for Pakatan Rakyat is NOT a quick track to a you do of Hudud. Neither is there a faith which you will get Hudud if you opinion PR. In reality, PAS will not have sufficient seats to exercise Hudud even if they wish to do so.
PAS will be contesting usually one-third a 222 seats as well as they need two-thirds to shift a laws in Parliament. Even if they win ALL a seats they contest, it's still one-third. Cha! nces have been they will win might be half a one-third.
But for sure, you WILL get a hurtful government if you DON'T opinion for Pakatan Rakyat.
To put it simply, if it come down to choosing by casting votes for Hudud contra corruption, which do you want?
If you hate or fear Hudud so much, afterwards let's reject PR. Then, let's opinion a standing quo as well as go upon to 'enjoy' a same recipe of racism, discrimination, abuse of energy as well as crime IF you feel which this might be improved than a risk of getting Hudud.
Remember Albert Einstein's words: Insanity is you do a same thing over as well as over again as well as expecting different results.
Before you go upon to be swept divided by a strong waves of debate, remember which a faith of Hudud is NOT there.
If you choose to do a same thing, travel down a same path in our voting, a likelihood which racism, discrimination, abuse of energy as well as crime you will positively get, no disbelief about it.
Think carefully about what you want. Are you being influenced by a doubt of Hudud to capitulate in foster for a faith racism! , discri mination, abuse of energy as well as corruption?
Is which what you want? Think carefully. If so, afterwards reject PR as well as opinion BN as well as face a guarantee of being afflicted by a same social sadness which you have been facing for decades - discrimination! , abuse of energy as well as corruption.
Are you being without eyes so much by a hooded flaw in a hudud discuss which you cannot see a timber for a trees?
The Star recently reported:
Both a Federal Constitution as well as a stream legislative horizon do not concede for hudud to be implemented by any state, pronounced a Bar Council.
Expressing a regard over a new "political posturing" in reviving a probability of implementing hudud, a president Lim Chee Wee called upon all parties to instead defend a Federal Constitution as a autarchic law of a land.
"Hudud cannot be implemented inside of a stream constitutional as well as legislative framework," he said.
"The Malaysian ! Bar call s upon all parties to defend a Federal Constitution as a autarchic law of a land as well as stop all tongue upon a you do of hudud, which has fundamentally caused confusion as well as division.
"They should focus instead upon strengthening a rule of law as well as approved process," he said, adding which a Supreme Court statute in 1988 had confirmed Malaysia as a secular state.
The Federal Constitution, he pronounced in a statement, usually allowed a states to enact laws formulating offences by persons professing Islam, against a precepts of Islam, as well as a particular punishments for such offences.
Read a Malaysian Bar Council press recover here.
Is there a reason to fear hudud? Why have been you (politicians included) being distracted by a hudud debate? Focus!
What do you really wish for Malaysia?
- masterwordsmith
Malaysians Must Know a TRUTH Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment