October 3, 2011
www.themalaysianinsider.com
Lawyers insist Najib, Rosmah not pass to Sodomy II
Datuk Seri Najib Razak as well as his mother have been not applicable witnesses to Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's ongoing sodomy trial, their lawyers claimed today, adding which the duo would not be means to offer any element justification to the court.
Datuk Hisyam Teh, the single of the lawyers representing the Prime Minister as well as Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor in their joint application to avoid testifying, pronounced which the opposition personality has unsuccessful to furnish reason which the dual were applicable witnesses.
The counsel pronounced Anwar's application to enforce Najib as well as mother to attest was merely the "fishing expedition" to find information.
While Najib certified to assembly Anwar's accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, upon Jun 24, 2008 dual days prior to the purported sodomy action the PM's lawyers stressed which the assembly was not associated to events upon Jun 26.
"I cannot give [any] applicable justification upon what has been brought up by the initial respondent (Anwar)," pronounced Hisham, who review out excerpts of Najib's affidavit.
Rosmah's acknowledgment contained the same explanation."However, you would similar to to disagree which the assembly upon Jun twenty-four has no nexus, no connection to the incident upon Jun 26, 2008.
"The initial respondent wants the PM to clarify. This clarification, acknowledgment upon what happened upon Jun twenty-four is not continuous to the first act, which is the charge the incident was upon Jun 26,! not the day prior to or after," pronounced Hisham.
"They have no legal right to call any chairman not in possession of element or applicable evidence," 
said the lawyer. "Where is the connection to the charge?"Hisyam additionally stressed which Rosmah was not the relevant, element declare notwithstanding the fact the Police had recorded the 112 page matter from her.
Anwar, in his affidavit-in-reply, claimed which the PM's mother was in the position to give applicable evidence, which would support the justice in proceedings against him.The acknowledgment adds which his lawyers had interviewed Rosmah's associate, Datuk Mumtaz Begum Jaafar, as well as which she pronounced there was the assembly in between Saiful's close friend, Muhamad Rahimi Osman as well as Rosmah.
Lead prosecutor Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden supported Najib as well as Rosmah's twin applications to set upon out the subpoenas, observant which Anwar had no basis in which to call them to testify.
"All Anwar wants to know is what transpired during the assembly in between Najib as well as Saiful this is highly prejudicial," pronounced Yusof. Judge Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah pronounced he will broach his preference upon Thursday.
The hearing resumes tomorrow, when the counterclaim will talk Lim Kong Boon, the Director-General of the Chemist Department.
Karpal Singh: Prime Minister Najib's sworn statement is consequential to the Sodomy II Trial
By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal (10-03-11)@www.themalaysianinsider.com
Da! tuk Seri Najib Razak's sworn statement is consequential to the Sodomy II trial, veteran counsel Karpal Singh argued today, observant it could shed light upon the disposition of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's prosecution in the days leading up to the purported incident.
Karpal asserted which as the Prime Minister had met Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan upon the night of July twenty-four dual days prior to the latter accused Anwar of sodomising him Najib's comment of the assembly would "go the prolonged way" in aiding the court.
Anwar's lead counterclaim counsel pointed out which Najib's acknowledgment had stated which the PM had advised Saiful afterwards to board the military report, after the political help had purported upon July twenty-four which Anwar had sodomised him.
Karpal remarkable which Saiful had unsuccessful to heed Najib's advice, as well as instead went upon to subject himself to the "alleged sodomy upon him by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, dual days later upon Jun 26, 2008."
"It is required to obtain justification from the Prime Minister with regard to SP1's (Saiful) state of mind, as well as either he was frightened, or either the Prime Minister would have expected SP1 to follow his advice," Karpal pronounced today.
"Surely, the single would follow the recommendation of the personality of no mean rank, namely the (then) Deputy Prime Minister whose recommendation was sought."
Read More @ Source 
No comments:
Post a Comment