Lawyers insist Najib, Rosmah not key to Sodomy II

Najib as well as Rosmah have been both looking to equivocate having to attest in Anwars sodomy trial. File pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 3 Datuk Seri Najib Razak as well as his wife have been not applicable witnesses to Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahims ongoing sodomy trial, their lawyers claimed today, adding that a duo would not be means to offer any material justification to a court.

Datuk Hisyam Teh, one of a lawyers representing a prime apportion as well as Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor in their joint duplicate to equivocate testifying, pronounced that a opposition personality has failed to allow proof that a dual were applicable witnesses.

The counsel pronounced Anwars duplicate to enforce Najib as well as wife to attest was merely a fishing expedition to seek information.

While Najib certified to assembly Anwars accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, upon Jun 24, 2008 dual days prior to a alleged sodomy action a PMs lawyers stressed that a assembly was not associated to events upon Jun 26.

I cannot give [any] applicable justification upon what has been brought up by a initial respondent (Anwar), pronounced Hisham, who read out excerpts of Najibs affidavit.

Rosmahs affidavit contained a same explanation.

However, you would like to disagree that a assembly upon Jun twenty-four has no nexus, no connection to a incident upon Jun 26, 2008.

The initial respondent wants a PM to clarify. This clarification, confirmation upon what happened upon Jun twenty-four is not continuous to a first act, that is a charge... a incident was upon Jun 26, not a day prior to or after, pronounced Hisham.

They have no legal right to call any person not in receive of material or applicable evidence, pronounced a lawyer. Where is a connection to a charge?!

< strong>MORE TO COME