So what is it which you unequivocally want? Can you only concentration upon putting Pakatan in power? Why all these threats of not choosing by casting votes for Pakatan or PAS? We can regularly plead a Hudud emanate after once Pakatan is in power. And, as you said, if Pakatan does something you do not similar to (such as they go as great as practice Hudud) afterwards you can regularly flog them out as great as opinion Barisan Nasional back in again, say, in 2016 or 2017.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Last year, you launched a Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) in London. Immediately after that, a antithesis domestic parties made a preference not to work with a MCLM. Many Pakatan Rakyat supporters pronounced a little really nasty things about us. They even indicted us of being Trojan horses, agents/plants of Barisan Nasional, as great as worse.
We afterwards went upon a road show to insist a goal as great as vision. Those whom you spoke to concluded which what's great for a goose is great for a gander. In other words, a blade cuts both ways. The blade which you have make use of of to cut Barisan Nasional's twist grip can as great as should cut Pakatan Rakyat's twist grip as well, if they become only similar to Barisan Nasional.
So because do you instruct to cut Barisan Nasional's throat? Simple! Because Barisan Nasional practices racism, persecution, resourceful prosecution, abuse of power, corruption, etc. Barisan Nasional manipulates a state agencies (such as a judiciary, police, MACC, AG Chambers, mainstream media, etc.) for domestic purposes. With Barisan Nasional in power, there is obvious wastage as great as injustice of taxpay! er's m oney. And a list goes on.
Barisan Nasional creates a lot of promises during every electio! n. They even come out with a most considerable Election Manifesto choosing after election. But they never deliver their choosing promises. In fact, they do a reverse of what they promise.
Barisan Nasional also has really low quality lawmakers, both during council as great as state levels. We protest which with a unenlightened logging in East Malaysia, a Orang Utan is apropos extinct. What you have been saying instead is a Orang Utan being sent to council as great as a state assemblies as great as these people act even worse than Orang Utan (just view a videos upon Youtube to see what you mean).
In short, you instruct change. And you know what changes you want. We have been really transparent in a minds what is wrong with Malaysia as great as what needs to be finished to put all this right.
So a key word is CHANGE. That is what you seek. We have been not meddlesome in 'repackaging'. We have been not fooled by costly PR exercises about so-called (how siow) reforms. We do not instruct to see aged wine in a brand new bottle. It contingency be genuine shift as great as shift for a better. And which is because you instruct Barisan Nasional out.
The MCLM attempted to argue which in most countries they changed ! a gove rnment to find shift though did not unequivocally see change. Sometimes it was even a box of out of a frying pan as great as into a fire. What they got was worse. Our job is to have certain which when you flog out Barisan Nasional as great as reinstate it with Pakatan Rakyat you do actually see shift as great as not finish up with aged wine in a brand new bottle. This is a goal as great as prophesy of a MCLM.
And a way to safeguard this is to initial of all have certain which they do not send Orang Utans to council or to any of a state assemblies. They contingency be people of calibre/quality as great as a emanate of a 2008 ubiquitous choosing has proven which this is really important. If this has been celebrated then, today, a state of Perak would still be undernea! th Pakat an Rakyat rule.
Anwar Ibrahim's excuse was which it is not which easy to find possibilities of calibre/quality to margin in a ubiquitous elections. So you offered to assistance find these candidates. We were aware which a little people had been approached back in 1999, 2004 as great as 2008. But they refused to competition a elections even though they were promised which they need not stick upon any of! a par ties as great as could competition as independent candidates, though underneath any one of a celebration banners.
We approached all these people again as great as still they refused to competition a elections. Finally, after pleading with them to sacrifice for their nation as great as to do 'national service', they reluctantly agreed.
Then, suddenly, all ruin broke loose. We were indicted of an attempt to trigger three-corner fights to sabotage Pakatan Rakyat so which Barisan Nasional could win a election. After failing to convince a people which this is not so, you told Haris Ibrahim to only forget about a 'Independent Candidates Initiative'. Let Pakatan Rakyat arrange out their own candidates. Let's not get concerned in this practice any longer. And if they fail to get great possibilities afterwards which is their problem. It is not any concern of a MCLM.
What you would concentration upon instead is to give talks, do training, etc., as great as some-more importantly, to push a Rakyat Reform Agenda (RARA) as great as The People's Declaration (Deklarasi Rakyat). This is basically to tell a domestic parties how you instruct a nation to be run as great as what you design from a supervision -- whomsoever it might be which will be combining a government, whether Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat.
But a sound from a ground was still ABU (anything though Umno/asal bukan Umno). They do not care a damn about RARA or The People's Declaration or whatever. They only instruct BN out as great as Pakatan in. The rest you can speak AFTER you shift a government.
We attempted ! to insis t which what you instruct to see have been changes. We have been not in a commercial operation of becoming different a government. We have been in a commercial operation of saying reforms. So you contingency concentration upon changes, not upon becoming different a government.!
Nevertheless, if you need to shift a supervision to be able to see changes afterwards which is what you shall have to do. But you shall be becoming different a supervision to safeguard which you see changes as great as not shift a supervision for a sake of becoming different a government. Changing a supervision is a means. Reform is a objective.
But no! We shall shift a government, period! Changes can come later, AFTER you shift a government. No have make use of of to speak about all which now. Change a supervision first.
Okay, if which is what you insist you do afterwards which is what you shall do. So you launched ABU (anything though Umno/asal bukan Umno). W! e shall shift a supervision as great as afterwards cross a fingers as great as urge for a best. We shall take a chance as great as goal which by becoming different a supervision you do actually see changes. If this is what you instruct afterwards this is what you shall do. So it will be ABU then.
After similar with all of you which this is what you shall do, right away most of you have been articulate which you will not be choosing by casting votes Pakatan or will not opinion for PAS because of this Hudud issue. Why is this such as issue? you suspicion you have been starting for ABU. you suspicion you have been starting to shift a supervision initial as great as 'talk later'.
The MCLM did contend you should speak initial as great as afterwards confirm if Pakatan can deliver what you instruct -- in a eventuality they come to energy with a votes. But you said, 'No!" We initial put Pakatan in energy as great as afterwards plead later, once they have been in power, what you instruct (or do not want). But right away you have been you do a U-t! urn (lik e what you indicted me of doing). Now you have been threatening not to opinion for Pakatan or PAS.
So what is it which you unequivocally want? Can you only concentration upon putting Pakatan in power? Why all these threats of not choosing by casting votes for Pakatan or PAS? We can regularly plead a Hudud emanate after once Pakatan is in power. And, as you said, if Pakatan does something you do not similar to (such as they go as great as practice Hudud) afterwards you can regularly flog them out as great as opinion Barisan Nasional back in again, say, in 2016 or 2017.
Cruzeiro is one of those who oppose a MCLM as great as would similar to to see ABU. you hope, therefore, he will concentration upon ABU as great as not write articles such as this: http://cruzinthots.blogspot.com/2011/10/a! rrogant- holy-pas-ready-to-abandon-and.html. Articles similar to these might turn a people opposite ABU.
Malaysians Must Know a TRUTH
No comments:
Post a Comment