By : UBF MEDIA
DATUK Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan, Chairman of Borneo Heritage Foundations United Borneo Front (UBF), has clarified which a call for a maximum dual tenure rule is not a criticism about a approach present leaders have been ruling a nation or a State of Sabah so UMNO Sabah leaders need not be so defensive as well as overly suspicious when debating this issue.
The idea has been thrown into a Prime Ministers court as well as it is for parliament to consider a rationale of this request. The fact which dual UMNO leaders have insinuated which this has anything to do with a Chief Ministers abilities usually shows a terrible miss of comprehension on their part as to what is being legitimately requested by a movement, pronounced Dr. Jeffrey.
He pronounced which a request to a Prime Minister is to put in place a inhabitant process which would lead towards a eventual legislative addition of a Federal as well as State Constitutions to allow for a dual tenure maximum rule for a Prime Minister post as well as Chief Ministers of every State.
The basement for this idea is to discharge systemic corruption as well as fervour which comes with a relief felt by dictators who have been in positions of care for too long. We wish to equivocate a type of revolutions which have been taking place in countries where a proletariat have been already during boiling indicate opposite leaders who have been far too greedy to release their seats to younger leaders as well as instead of planning a correct succession plan, they wish to reason on to energy forever.
Dr. Jeffrey also settled which this is not a di! rect cri ticism opposite any Prime Minister or Chief Minister in this nation as well as UMNO Sabah members ! who have been so quick to criticize need not be so defensive or feel threatened by UBFs suggestions.
Any right thinking leader who understands initial universe governing body would sense a rationale for a arguments as well as as such should discuss with an open mind. Many great leaders who did great jobs as Prime Ministers have vacated after a maximum dual terms because they accepted a rationale of this argument. They have been remembered for excellence as well as not tyranny.
Dr. Jeffrey also pronounced which Malaysia should not have policies on a assumption which they go on superfluous backwards.
This nation needs to move from being a developing nation to a developed republic as well as if policies similar to a dual tenure rule is not in place now, afterwards when have been you ever starting to start being ready for Mahathirs Vision 2020 which is usually 9 years away?
If you hope to have it into a OECD as well as verbalise with any credibility on a universe stage, you contingency welcome a reality of a dual tenure rule as being a grounds on which a political system can function with a correct succession devise for a benefit of future generations, he added.
Dr. Jeffrey also voiced disappointment which a leader in a BN stay should criticize Prime Ministers in this nation by commenting which they shift policies with every brand new Prime Minister.
Prime Ministers as leaders normally respect their predecessors as well as try to be unchanging in their policies especially if a Prime Ministers have been from a same party. Changing policies with every Prime Minister suggests inconsistency which is obviously not a approach to go in great governance unless of course Dahlan is suggesting which all prior policies have been so bad they had to be changed?
This is not a great reason to ! refuse a dual tenure maximum rule as well as you contingency not consider of a Chief Minister alone though a great of a total nation when putting in place this critical process for change.
No comments:
Post a Comment