Malacca was a roadside toilet-stop

By John Doe

If a single were to expostulate from KL to Singapore, would a single stop in Malacca? Unless we needed to piss or shit unequivocally badly, we would only expostulate through, am I right? Similarly, if a single were to expostulate from Singapore to Penang, would we stop at Malacca? Look at a Malacca River. It is distant as well small to be useful.

In comparison, demeanour at a Muar River, a Lembah Bujang River, as well as a Singapore River. According to Sejarah Melayu, a Singapore Port was already important during Raja Secander Shah's grandfather's time. It was wide, as well as a waters have been deep.

Now contrast this to a Malacca River. It is intensely narrow, as well as does not permit ships to go up or down. Some have argued which a ships could have parked outside. GREAT !! Why call yourself a car-park, when we have to play ground outside? Why buy submarines which cannot go underwater? Why not open a "Self-service Massage Center" as well as claim fame? Korek Korek Korek !!!

*Hint: Use Google Maps to review a river sizes, as well as tell me which a Malacca River does not demeanour similar to a Longkang !

And while upon a topic, do additionally demeanour at how all a alternative Empires built their Kingdoms distant away from a sea. See how distant internal Angkor, Ayudthaya, Lopburi, Sukkhothai, Pegu, Bagan, Borrobudor as well as so upon were. These genuine Kingdoms had genuine brains.

By building a Capital so distant inland, they reduced a risk of a Naval attack. Instead, Malacca had a IQ of a door-nail. "Let's build it right subsequent to a sea, so which thirty pitiful ships can beat a 100,000 fighting men".

Malacca was ! massivel y losing money for a Dutch. In fact, it contributed to creation a VOC go broke ! Go review up upon how a Malacca River had to ! be chain ed up each night, so which a Bugis Pirates would not rob a place. And how a sailors had to sleep upon their ships for fright of a same reason. This sounds so much similar to how a Malaysian Police had to pierce their Station away from Chow Kit area, since it was as well dangerous for a Police. GREAT !!

Also review up upon how a Sultan of Malacca went bankrupt, as well as how Nina Chatu had to loan him money all a time. And when a Sultan refused to pay off him, Nina Chatu went to a Portuguese for help. Fortunately, a miserly Sultan motionless to conflict a Portuguese ship for not paying "toll" (aka coercion money) upon a approach to Hoi An (in Vietnam). The Portuguese went after a goods upon their own, as well as motionless to bypass a "Ketuanan Malacca".

To cut a long story short, a Portuguese sent thirty ships to COLONIZE Malacca. They afterwards wrote wonderful things about Malacca as a Strategic Defense Center, so which they could get some-more Military funding. Don't forget which a Napoleonic Wars were only around a corner. It helps if Malaysians had maps which magnify a small some-more than Singapore as well as Hadyai. It additionally helps if Malaysians started guidance a small some-more about alternative countries.

Try this simple Trivia-Challenge:

Name 10 countries which have NEVER played in any World Cup before (without looking their names up anywhere)

Back to a stupid Dutch, who thought what they Portuguese wrote about Malacca was true, as well as motionless to conquer Malacca themselves. The Dutch realized very quickly, which Malacca was not worth it, as well as set up heir HQ in Jakarta instead. Google all we want, as well as we will notice how a Dutch were simply not interested in Malacca.

Anyway, when a VOC went bankrupt! , they b egged a British to take over Malacca. The Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824, additionally known as a Treaty of London, was a covenant signed in between a United Kingdom as well as a Netherlands in London upon seventeen Mar 1824.

!

If UMNO is as well dumb to read, afterwards can someone please print a copy of a Anglo-Dutch Treaty for them. Knowing UMNO, they would substantially claim which a Dutch never colonized Malacca either.... They Dutch traded Malacca for Bencoolen. (remember Bencoolen Street anyone?)

Just recollect which a Brits never fired a shot to take over Malacca. They were handed it, upon a platter. The Brits longed for Penang as well as Singapore actually, though since this was a land in-between their prized possessions, they motionless "Oh, what a heck". So, UMNO is right away observant which a handing over a Colony of Malacca to a British did not happen?

In addition, You can additionally review up upon how all a "Perang Saudara's" were going on, as well as since of that, it was simply easy for a Colonizers to strut in as well as take over any land they wished. And it is true. Malaysia has NEVER been Colonized. Since 1957, no a single colonized Malaysia. (Well,..... unless we consider which UMNO did inhabit it)

In closing, do review up upon a failure of a VOC here:
http://gutenberg.net.au/VOC.html

or another a single here:
http://countrystudies.us/indonesia/9.htm

If Malacca was so full of blood important, why was it not even mentioned ONCE?

Anyone still recollect how Parameswara is NOT mentioned in Sejarah Melayu?

N.B. To date, no a single has submitted any evidence, nor refutted what John Doe has written about Malacca

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz