I am confused!

I am confused!

Telco companies announced which they have been starting to pass a 6% use taxation to a people.

This use taxation is not imposed by a telcos, though rsther than by a supervision for god knows how many years now. Those who have been using fixed lines as good as postpaid have been paying these taxes, as good as those who subscribe to heavenly body TVs.

This use taxation was increased from 5% to 6% during a last bill presentation..

This taxation is imposed by a government, as good as whatever amount paid by a users goes to supervision coffers.

Now, a supervision has called a assembly as good as successfully asked a telcos not to pass a taxation onto a users.

This implies which a supervision knows which a 6% use taxation is a weight upon a people.

If a supervision knows which this 6% use taxation is a weight upon a people, afterwards logically a supervision should be a a single calling off a deception of such tax, not only upon telcos, though upon alternative services as well.

Why has a supervision selectively asked a telcos to continue absorb this tax, instead of cancelling a deception of use tax?

After all, this taxation is imposed by a supervision as good as a income goes to a supervision , not to a telcos. Telcos merely pick up what a supervision wish a users to pay, a 6% tax.

So why blame a telcos as good as express shock which a telcos have been starting to pass this taxation to a users?

Who is a culprit? The a single who imposes this tax, or a a single only collecting from finish users upon interest of a a single who imposes a tax?

See, this is genuine confusing!

Like this:

Be a first to like this post.

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz