(Breaking News 10:30 am : Folks there is an additional video. This the singular shows Tan Sri Rahim Tambi Chik, Dato Eskay as well as Johari Abdul. You can see it here athttp://ruangbicarafaisal.blogspot.com/2011/06/video-aksi-johari-abdul-menonton-video.html. you consider it is self explanatory. In the video the watch is shown by Dato Eskay to Johari Abdul. It is believed to be which 'missing' watch. Here have been dual questions : How is Johari Abdul going to insist this video? How many other videos have been there?)
*********************************************************************************
The following is an article by Dr Chandra Muzaffar about Bersih.
By Dr Chandra Muzaffar
It is the pity which almost 54 years after Merdeka there is still the good deal of uneasiness between the authorities about the fundamental right which is so necessary to the functioning of the democracy. They dont think about which the right to assemble peaceably as well as but arms is the leisure enshrined in Article 10 of the Malaysian Constitution. It is the leisure whose tact will not, in many circumstances, threaten the contentment of society.
.
Nonetheless, similar to all rights as well as fr! eedoms, the tangible expression as well as articulation of the Freedom of Assembly has to take in to comment the context. It is this context which is critical in the box of the programmed Jul 9 Rally. There have been assorted dimensions to this context which Bersih, the proponent of the rally, as well as Perkasa as well as UMNO Youth, the opponents, will have to take heed of.
.
Issues.
1) Bersih claims which the first role of the convene is to highlight weaknesses as well as defects in the control of the elections. Since it has had discussions with the Elections Commission on this it should continue to speak to which body. The Chairman of the Commission is prepared to dialogue. He should right away publicly entice Bersih to resume the discussions, the Jul 9 convene notwithstanding. Bersih, in turn, should reply definitely to the Commission. In the grown up democracy any as well as every opportunity to discourse in order to resolve issues should be taken up.
.
2) Some of the issues which Bersih has focussed on such as the involuntary registration of electorate (which you endorse) have been beyond the purview of the Elections Commission. They would need legislative approval. If Bersih cannot persuade the Barisan Nasional (BN) government to deliver brand new electoral laws, has it succeeded in removing Pakatan Rakyat (PR) MPs to list the in isolation members check on any of the electoral reforms it is right away demanding? On how many occasions have such bills been tabled given March 2008? Were attempts to list such bills thwarted by the Speaker of the Dewan Rakyat? Since Bersih includes antithesi! s partie s represented in Parliament, it should inform the open in item on how it sought electoral remodel by Parliament in the final 3 years.
.
3) In creation the demands, Bersih has not distinguished the tangible control of elections from the incomparable electoral-cum-political process. The tangible control of elections in Malaysia given 1959, from the maintenance of electoral rolls to safeguardingthe firmness of the list paper,has been mostly satisfactory as well as just---- given which no electoral system in the universe is all devoid of flaws. This was the singular of the conclusions which the Election Watch organisation headed by the late Tun Mohamed Suffian Hashim which looked during the 1990 General Election (I was the member of which group) came to.
.
We additionally forked out which the miss of integrity in the electoral-political process was manifested in the incumbents injustice of state comforts for debate purposes as well as in the biased role of the mainstream media. Since these really bona fide concerns have not been addressed, Bersih has every reason to lift them.
.
4) If Bersih is frank about rectifying them, the domestic parties who have been in the forefront of this coalition, should set the e.g. in the states which have been underneath PR order by ensuring which state comforts have been not misused in any election or by-election. And yet, in by-elections in Selangor, Penang as well as Kedah, it is purported which the state government had deployed the little of the resources of the state, but delay as well as indirectly, for their campaigns. Similarly, if Bersih wants equitable entrance to BNinclined print as well as electronic media, it should ! addition ally inspire antithesis oriented online newspapers to be satisfactory as well as offset in their coverage as well as analysis of domestic issues. After all, cyber media in Malaysia currently is an critical source of information--- as well as disinformation.
.
5) While the little of Bersihs final have been reasonable, the disaster to fix up these final within the incomparable horizon has tarnished the credibility. For all the shortcomings in the electoral system, Malaysia is the singular of the couple of countries in the Global South which has held unchanging elections participated by parties with all divergent ideologies ever given Independence in 1957.It is similarly significant which these elections have been utterly giveaway of violence--- which is the monument in the Global South. In the first General Election itself, dual states came underneath an antithesis party. Today, 4 out of the thirteen states in the Federation have been in antithesis hands. There has never been the singular moment in Malaysian electoral governing body when the antithesis has commanded reduction than 35 per cent of the popular vote.
.
Security.
.
1) If the issues lifted by Bersih should be noticed in their correct context, so should the open give due care to the subject of security which is expressly settled in Article 10 (2), a, b, as well as c of the Constitution. There is no denying which with 3 organisations reporting their determination to hold rallies as well as marches but military permit, the domestic heat has increased by the couple of degrees. Leaders of dual of the organisations have perceived genocide threats.
.
2) There is an additional contextual dimension to the security subject which you cannot means to ignore. In the first Bersih proof on Nov 10 2007, the series of people were injured. There were additionally similar casualties in the Hindraf proof on Nov twenty-five in the same year. In almost all the reformasi demonstrations from Sep! tember 1 998 to the middle of 2000, people as well as the little military personnel were hurt.
.
3) I had suspicion initially which Bersih demonstrators should be authorised to congregate in the stadium, in accordance with their constitutional right but you didnt realise which there was the security emanate lurking in the shadows. Apparently, if the track option had materialised,certain elements in Bersih, it is alleged, would have incited the track to the Tahrir Square, with demonstrators camping there day as well as night for weeks on end.
Of course, the Western media would be there to dramatise the event, especially given both the de facto as well as de jure leaders of Bersih --- Anwar Ibrahim as well as Ambiga Sreenivasan --- have such close ties to the Western media. It would be the distressing caricature of probity given the Malaysian situation bears no comparison to Mubaraks Egypt or to those strict Arab monarchies as well as republics which have been right away being challenged by their people. None of them is an heir to some-more than 5 decades of continuous civilian order legitimised by rival electoral politics.
.
Impact.
.
1) How the due Jul 9 convene as well as counter rallies will impact on cab drivers, traders, shoppers as well as ! the gene ral open is nonetheless an additional factor which deserves the attention.There is the high luck which the rallies will cause the degree of dislocation especially given 3 different groups with their own agendas have been involved. Traders as well as cab drivers in the affected areas will inevitably suffer the loss of income. Here again, the past is the good teacher. In previous demonstrations in Kuala Lumpur, people in assorted walks of li! fe have had to pay the price.
.
2) It is utterly fathomable which Jul 9 will strengthen nonetheless an additional unhealthy development which has turn some-more as well as some-more obvious in the final dual years. Partisan domestic polarisation is increasing in the country. The BN-PR schism is deepening within the populace. If you do not have the critical attempt to retreat the trend, you may pierce in the citation of Thai governing body which has been exceedingly hamstrung by the cleavage which separates those with the government as well as those with Thaksin Shinawatra.
.
Motives.
.
1) There have been additionally distant motives at the back of the Bersih plan which any in accord with chairman would probe. you am really most aware of this partly since of my own experience with demonstrations as well as the self-indulgent governing body of the budding mover at the back of Jul 9. When you was Deputy President of Parti Keadilan Nasional ( right away Rakyat) (PKR) from 1999 to 2001, the celebration was solidly at the back of the reformasi demonstrations. After the whilst you realized which the demonstrations were taking us nowhere; they were not heading to any approved awakening between the masses. On the contrar! y, the p eople were branch opposite the celebration since of the hardship they caused.
.
A series of the activists were arrested, the little underneath the ISA. Most of all, you could see which the demonstrations instigated by Anwar from at the back of jail walls served usually the singular purpose: to keep him in the limelight, as well as to get him out of prison. Within the celebration leadership, you took an evident in front of opposite demonstrations. With the exception of Keadilan President, Dr.Wan Azizah Ismail, no on! e else s upported me. The Malaysian open came to know of my antithesis to the demonstrations, as well as the afterwards Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohammad even alluded to it in the media.
.
2) Anwars distant ground is even some-more contemptuous today. He desperately wants to turn Prime Minister, and will review to any means to achieve his ambition. He is anticipating which Jul 9 will assistance him overcome the little of the obstacles he right away faces as well as give him the boost which he needs. A large mobilisation of his supporters as well as fence-sitters on Jul 9, he thinks, will divert courtesy from his sodomy trial which starts later in the month as well as from his sex-video scandal. At the same time, he is awaiting the proof to emanate the sort of movement which will eat away support for the BN as well as shore up his own position. If this impresses his allies as well as endorsersin the little Western capitals they may even give him stronger subsidy to achieve the system of administration change.
.
3) Apart from Anwars own party, both his PR partners, the Islamic Party of Malaysia(PAS) as well as the Democratic Action ! Party (D AP), have been additionally driven by the enterprise to benefit powerthrough the quickest route. For them additionally the finish justifies the means. Jul 9--- whatever the arguments opposite it--- is an critical stepping-stone towards which goal.
.
Once Malaysians assimilate the context--- especially the distant motives--- theywill be heedful about Jul 9. They will be able to distinguish the self-indulgent agenda of the deeply injured statesman from the genuine quest for electoral remodel as well as domestic transformation. They should not allow such the statesman to undermine their future.
.
Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is the domestic scientist who has written extensively on Malaysian politics.
27 June 2011.
Posted by Syed Akbar Ali
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment