The Malay Rulers can choose to be like a Three Monkeys upon top of where theySEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL & HEAR NO EVIL when it concerns BN/Umno or be upon a side of a RAKYAT. The CHOICE is theirs.
ByAdmin
The moment ofTRUTHhas arrived for a Malaysian Monarchy. The Malay Rulers contingency make their mount now either they have been upon a side of a Rakyat (People) or which of a Satanic BN/Umno Regime of Najib Razak. It is tough to hold which a Royalty have been preoccupied to what is happening to a republic either it is about deaths in Police custody, dispersion of non Muslim places of worship, threats to burn theBible, murder cover ups, choosing rascal by a Election Commission,foreigners been since Citizenship in lapse for voting BN/Umno, financial scandals by a BN/Umno Regime, a one after another harm of non Muslim Malaysian's by a JAKIM as well as a State Religious Councils, a one after another existence of extremists organizations such as PERKASA, PEKIDA, GPMSetc..
The Royalty can't only say which they have been upon top of governing body when you haveidiotic decreesfrom a likes of a Sultan of Selangor upon a Allah issue. The Malay Royals contingency comprehend which 40% of their subjects have been non Muslims. The Royals contingency be reminded which they have been statute during a wish of a Rakyat as well as not a alternative approach around. The Malay Rulers can't fake toSEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL & HEAR NO EVIL!
The following essay from theMALAYSIA CHRONICLEsums it up:
Speaking during a launch of a book upon a Malaysian monarchy, Malaysian budding apportion Najib bin Razak pronounced which th! e Malay Rulers "are upon top of politics" (see 'Najib: Constitutional kingdom fosters stability, prosperity ', The Malaysian Insider, 30 January 2013).
He pronounced which a Malaysian kingdom "provides a solid foundation" for branch Malaysia in to a high-income nation.
To be upon top of governing body equates to to not interfere in a domestic workings of a republic as well as to take no sides in celebration politics.
To act as a substructure to a manage to buy so which Malaysian adults suffer tall incomes equates to abstaining from as well as disapproving a undemocratic use of a public's resources as well as resources.
So is a budding minister's statement about a Malaysian kingdom true?
The evidence paints a different story.
A Negri Sembilan prince simplified which a kingship have as well as do participate in celebration governing body as well as gave five examples (see ' Response to statements by Tunku Aziz as well as Anthony Loke ', The Malaysian Insider, 29 January 2013).
In his biography of Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysian Maverick (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2009), Barry Wain speaks about how a sultans of a 9 states had "sometimes p! layed pol! itics, leveraged their positions for financial benefit as well as indulged in fairytale-like extravagance during a public expense". Although a sultans were "not meant to engage in commerce, they were essentially so deep! ly invol ved which they were resented by a business community".
Roger Kershaw's Monarchy in South-East Asia (Routledge, 2001) states which "in lapse for secure resources as well as status", a Malaysian kingdom gives a statute Malay elite a "more normal kind of legitimacy" by proxy, in what is pronounced to be an "important though unwritten 'social contract'" in ? la mode Malaysia.
On this domestic relationship, join forces with highbrow Azlan Tajuddin in Malaysia in a World Economy (1824-2011) (Lexington Press, 2012) claims which when a constitutional essay upon stately immunity in 1993 was removed, "the real aim" of a supervision of seeking "full carry out of a monarchy" was "to safeguard which a Malay kingship one after another to offer a domestic duty in preserving Malay electoral await for "Pakatan Rakyat"". The author says it should not be startling "to find a little of a sultans publicly generating await for "Pakatan Rakyat" or admonishing those who have been vicious of a party".
He explains: "For a royals, a reward for subservience to a celebration [UMNO] would additionally sustain one after another enjoyment of unrivalled advantages... Several members of a a Malay royalty... have found their approach in to "Pakatan Rakyat"'s circle of crony entrepreneurs... Many royally-run businesses have resulted in numerous bankruptcies... [but] as long as a Malay rulers remained staunch "Pakatan Rakyat" supporters, they! would be! assured their businesses stayed operational as well as have been since entrance to remunerative blurb ventures".
Fadzilah Majid Cooke's The Challenge of Sustainable Forests: Forest Resource Policy in Malaysia, 1970-1995(Allen & Unwin, 1999) notes which between 1987 as well as 1990 alone, a Pahang stately family was awarded logging concession licenses totalling 18,723.82 hectare! s (or 18 7 square kilometres) of forest.
In illustrating a "growing economic nexus in a ruler-executive family in probably every Malay State", Kershaw links a "[Pahang] Sultan['s] fervent ambience for timber concessions" to "being 'genuinely' consulted... over a appointment of Chief Ministers" as well as a need for a "malleable" Chief Minister to expedite or hook rules in a "processing of land disunion during favoured rates".
Tajuddin claims which "[i]n 1981, a Sultan of Pahang as well as a little members of his family had allegedly gambled away massive amounts of taxpayer money within days of an tour during an overseas casino. When a state supervision refused to settle a debt, a state's chief minister, Rahim Bakar, was forced to resign from office. "Pakatan Rakyat" resolved a issue by... replacing a apportion with a some-more amenable candidate, who rapidly helped in clearing a sultan's gambling dues. In return, a sultan has remained a clever as well as constant disciple of "Pakatan Rakyat", especially during elections".
Tajuddin supplies another example: The Sultan of Perak's eldest daughter Eleena is "a major ! controlli! ng shareholder of Gamuda, an "Pakatan Rakyat"-linked construction company... [and] between Malaysia's top 40 millionaires in 2011". He adds which "[t]his has provided reasonable drift for Malaysians to speculate upon a connection between a Sultan of Perak's family fortunes" as well as a dislodgement of Pakatan Rakyat's state supervision headed by ex-chief apportion Nizar Jamaluddin.
According to The Economist (2 May 2009), Nizar "had been removed, not as is common in parliamentary systems, by his inaugurated peers though by a Perak sultan", Azlan Shah, "ignoring an appeal from [Nizar] to disintegrate a house". The outcome favoured "Pakatan Rakyat".
If these academic sources have been correct, it equates to which a Malaysian monarchs have been not "above politics" in annoy of appearances, as well as which a monarchy's stroke upon a public's economic welfare as well as rights is questionable.
SOURCE:http://english.cpiasia.net/
Posted byMarGeeMar
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment