Mursyidul Am UMNO,Dr Mahathir Mohamad,kata- "saya tidak fikir Pakatan Rakyat boleh memerintah- kerana mereka tidak ada pengalaman".Pengalaman apa yang dimaksudkan oleh Mahathir? Ini kenyataan tipikal pemimpin UMNO yang sombong dan bongkak. Seolah olah nya hanya UMNO sahaja yang layak memerintah. UMNO sahaja yang mempunyai kelayakan membawa kemajuan dan pembangunan.
Pembohongan dan penipuan Mahathir mudah dipatahkan- lapuran odit negara menyebut perihal rekod baik pimpinan kerajaan yang dikuasai oleh PR. Adakah Dr Mahathir mencadangkan bahawa ketua odit negara berbohong?
Saya sudah menyatakan banyak kali- jika Najib Tun Razak boleh jadi PM, semua orang lain pun boleh. Mentadbir negara Malaysia bukan suatu roket sains. Jika mereka yang bodoh dalam UMNO dan BN boleh memerintah Malaysia, mustahil yang cerdik, pandai dan bijak dalam Pakatan tidak mampu?
Bukankah Dr Mahathiir sendiri yang menyatakan bahawa yang tinggal dalam UMNO hanyalah pemimpin2 half past six ? yang bijak sudah masuk PAS, yang pandai masuk PKR dan yang cerdik sudah masuk DAP? Maka yang demikian, jika dullards dan yang bodoh dapat memerintah Malaysia selama 55 tahun dan menjahanamkan negara, mengapa yang lebih pandai tidak boleh?
Negeri2 yang di perintah oleh PR semua menunjukkan prestasi yang lebih baik dari semua segi berbanding dengan rekod pengurusan kerajaan BN. Jadi pengalaman apa yang Dr Mahathir cakapkan?
4 nege! ri yang dikuasai oleh PR meneruskan dominasi mereka sebagai destinasi pertama pelaburan asing. Kedah, Kelantan, Selangor dan Penang menguasai 55% dari pelaburan asing. Bajet dalam negeri2 ini sama ada seimbang atau berada dalam lebihan tanpa memanipulasi angka. Jika negeri2 ini memanipulasi ang! ka, suda h tentu media yang di miliki dan dikuasai oleh UMNO akan berpesta mendedahkan permainan angka.
Jadi pengalaman apa yang Dr Mahathir maksudkan? Memang benar, kita PR tidak ada pengalaman. Yakni pengalaman merompak dan melanun negara.
Kenapa Dr Mahathir yang sudah sampai umur 88 tahun itu seolah2 menjadi jurucakap dan jurubicara UMNO? Kerana Dr Mahathir mempunyai kepentingan peribadi untuk menentukan UMNO menang.
Dr Mahathir adalah orang yang pale ketakutan bila PR mengambil alih kerajaan. Dia bimbang akan keselamatan diri nya sendiri dan yang pale dia bimbangi ialah masa depan anak2 nya yang berniaga.
Kita hendak beritahu Dr Mahathir- kita tidak jel orang yang berumur 88 tahun. Kita akan hanya meminta pemulangan harta dan wang yang telah dicuri dari rakyat.
Saya sudah pun menyatakan- bila Pak Lah memenangi PRU dahulu dengan majoriti yang terbesar dalam sejarah- rakyat sebenar nya meraikan pengeluaran Mahathir. Kemudian negara kita dipimpin oleh seorang yang mencari al ghazali dan mencari kedamaian. Untuk seketika rakyat Malaysia terpukau dengan pengucapan batin Pak lah sehinggalah mereka sedar, bahawa itu semua untuk pendengaran umum. Pak lah ternyata menjadi PM yang pale lembab untuk negara ini.
Dalam PRU13, rakyat berpeluang sekali lagi menjatuhkan hukuman kepada Mahathir. Mari kita sama2 menghukum orang yang melingkup dan menjahanamkan maruah bangsa Melayu. Dr Mahathir bertanggung jawab menyebabkan orang melayu mengemis dalam negara mereka sendiri.
Kecuali orang Melayu mendapat keseronokan jika dizalimi, maka satu undi yang di beri kepada UMNO dan BN, bererti kita merelakan dan menyukai dizalimi dan disakiti. Satu undi untuk UMNO bererti kita akan ada 100 lagi skendel NFC. Satu undi untuk UMNO , kita akan ada lagi 100 Puspahanas, 100 pembelian kapal selam Scorpene, 100 pembelian pesawat kapalt! erbang.< br>
Satu undi untuk UMNO bererti kita menjatuhkan hukuman bunuh kepada diri sendiri.-Mohd.Ariff Sabri garbage bin Hj. Abdul Aziz@sakmongkol AK47
Mahathir should discuss Anwar...
Academicians contend such a showdown competence answer a lot of questions as great as apart a law from a spin.With Najib Tun Razak staunchly refusing to accept Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's plea to a debate, some local academics have been now meddlesome in seeing a showdown in in in in in between former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed as great as his one-time deputy.
Prominent historian Khoo Kay Kim told FMT which Malaysians were penetrating to know a law during a back of a fallout in in in in in between a two, generally now which a ubiquitous choosing is imminent.
"People wish to know what happened in in in in in between them, as great as a discuss similar to this competence answer their questions," pronounced Khoo.
"People know which Mahathir picked Anwar as great as gave him a tall position in Cabinet. They were unequivocally close. But then their attribute broke down as great as Anwar was thrown in to prison.
"People wish to know what happened, as great as they will only understand what indeed transpired if they come out as great as verbalise together in public."
Khoo pronounced which a information gleaned from a proposed discuss could assistance a open compute a law from a turn as great as in deciding which coalition to vote for in a ubiqu! itous el ection.
"Otherwise, you can only rest upon rumours. So a discuss similar to this competence assistance people to understand better which celebration is telling a truth."
Anwar, who is PKR's de facto leader, served directly under Mahathir as a Deputy Prime Minister as great as Umno Deputy President from 1993 to 1998. He was considered Mahathir's closest fan as great as destiny inheritor until he was unceremoniously sacked as great as sentenced to jail in 1999 upon charges of corruption as great as sodomy.
Since Anwar's recover from jail in 2004, he as great as Mahathir have been trading potshots over issues trimming from a 1997 Asian Financial Crisis to a citizenship-for-votes issue which is a theme of an ongoing open inquiry.
But they have not come face to face in a open debate.
'Personal topics will emerge'
Khoo expected which should such a discuss take place, a open could expect an engaging battle.
"Once they meet any alternative openly, there will be unequivocally personal questions thrown in. Things people do not know competence come out, as great as it will be unequivocally interesting."
He pronounced which Anwar would expected move up "all aspects of his attribute with Mahathir" which many Malaysians competence not be aware of.
"Mahathir is unequivocally clever;" Khoo pronounced with a chuckle. "You can't catch him since he knows how to turn as gre! at as tu rn. If he cannot answer, he will contend you cannot remember."
But he combined which Mahathir was not expected to determine to such a debate.
"I'm not sure such a discuss would happen. you consider Anwar would be fervent to discuss with Mahathir, though you consider Mahathir would not be interested."
Khoo additionally pronounced he was unable to envision who would win in a debate, adding which they were "equally good" as open speakers.
But Professor James Chin of Sunway Monash University pronounced he was sure which Anwar would emerge victorious.
"Anwar is a unequivocally great known debater," he said. "When he debated with a sports minister, a latter got hammered."
He agreed with Khoo which Malaysians would benefit from a open showdown in in in in in between a dual since both had "lots of things to hide".
"Mahathir as great as Anwar have both pronounced a alternative is during a back of a Project IC in Sabah," he said. "So this would be an event for them to infer who is actually telling a truth."
Mahathir has indicted Anwar of being a main man during a back of a project, observant a latter during times acted without orders from him.
But Anwar has claimed ignorance as great as indicted Mahathir of first a task force which postulated citizenship to illegal immigrants.
Chin forked out which this would additionally be a first event for Anwar to rivet with Mahathir given he was imprisoned in 1999.
'Distracting'
But Lim Teck Ghee, a executive of a Centre for Policy Initiatives, pronounced a discuss in in in in in between Anwar as great as a BN personality would be some-more utilitarian since Mahathir no longer represented BN.
"Unless Mahathir wants to take over from Najib or wants to go in to election, you do not see any usefulness in a discuss in in in in in between them," he said.
"Mahathir has his own agenda; he doesn't verbalise for BN nor does he lead it. He is simply an individual, a in isolation citizen, as great as he should handle similar to any alternative in isolation individual."
Lim combined which such a discuss could even be "distracting" compared to a discuss in in in in in between Anwar as great as Najib.
"It's unfortunate which Najib is refusing to rivet in a national discuss with Anwar since debates have been now finished all over a world.
"It is not great for Najib to avoid this. If he's confident which BN is you do well, he should be willing to debate."
However, Chandra Muzaffar, a boss of International Movement for a Just World, insisted which debates in in in in in between any individuals were not during all necessary.
"A discuss is polarised, with dual sides observant dual totally opposite things as great as you end up with dual sides scratching during! a singl e another. A discuss is just a open asserting a position from a certain perspective."
Instead, he said, a open indispensable all actors involved to be some-more reliable in presenting a facts.
"I consider a genuine plea is to apart facts from fiction, a spinning, a deliberate try to distort. you do not consider this is helping a rakyat, this sort of turn as great as distortion, people creation make use of of a new media.
"We need to move back reliable standards in open discourse to present what is unequivocally function as great as demeanour during both sides of a picture."-FMT
cheers.
Posted byali allah ditta
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | ! Pakat an Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment