The vicious thing is, while Dr Mahathir may have been guilty of 'reversing' what Tunku Abdul Rahman did, he did not action alone. This was not a single man's devise upon how to safeguard which Barisan Nasional as well as Umno do not remove power. It was a GOVERNMENT plan, with Dr Mahathir as head of which government, of course. And you contingency recollect which in 1991 Anwar was Malaysia's Finance Minister as well as in 1993 he became a Deputy Prime Minister. And a 'Christian' supervision of Sabah was defeated in 1994.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Over a last dual years my studies in British as well as European story has been equates to to help me look during events from a uninformed perspective. When you complicated story behind in our school days in Malaysia it was merely a study of dates as well as events, as well as maybe a personalities during a behind of those events.
Later they changed a synopsis to objective as well as you only marked a correct answer: A, B, C, D or E. That brought a level of preparation down drastically as well as sometimes you passed your exams by only making a lucky guess during what a right answer is.
Here in Oxford you need to look during a broader design to understand given what happened, happened. And if you request a Oxford procedure rsther than than a 'Pendidekan Malaysia' procedure (I am not even certain of a 'modern' Malay spelling any more) afterwards a Sabah'illegal immigrants given Malaysian citizenship'issue can be better understood.
Many of you celebration of a mass this have been substantially utterly young, born afterMerdekaof 1957 or after 'May 13' of 1969 -- or maybe you were still a child afterwards as well as did not know what was function around you! . Hence you will look during a 'Sabah issue' from today's perspective. And hence, also, you only want to know who a guilty person is in what you cruise a many heinous 'crime' -- in your perspective tantamount to treachery.
Now, you am not observant what they did in Sabah is legal or illegal, or even dignified or immoral. This piece is not about right as well as wrong. Historians do not pass judgement about events in history. They only break down in to parts what happened as well as what, in their opinion, were a causes of which event.
First let us go to behind to 1946, a year Umno was formed.
In 1946, a British Colonial supervision introduced a Malayan Union, which marked down a powers of theRaja-raja Melayu(Malay Rulers). This, in turn, meant which a Malays would remove a little of their powers. Hence a elite as well as intellectuals amongst a Malays against a Malayan Union.
Yes, it was a Malay elite category as well as a egghead community -- as well as not a fishermen as well as farmers -- who against a Malayan Union. Thekampongpeople did not unequivocally caring given their lives would remain a same never thoughts who ran a country.
Because of this antithesis to a Malayan Union, in 1948 a British abandoned a thought as well as instead introduced a Federation of Malaya orPersekutuan Tanah Melayu.
Next came a thought ofMerdekaor independence. And this took many years of negotiations (no red blood upon a streets, as what Umno tells us). One emanate of concern to Britain was what to do with a some-more than a single million Chinese as well as Indians after Malaya was givenMerdeka. They can't be sent behind to China as well as India so an independent Malaya had to catch them by giving them citizenship.
Now, note what Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad pronounced yesterday. He pronounced which Tunku Abdul Rahman was worse. The Tunku gave citizenship to some-more than a single million f! oreigner s. Maybe Dr Mahathir is trying to say which he gave citizenship to reduction than a single million foreigners.
What Dr Mahathir did not insist is which a Tunku had to agree to a extenuation of citizenship to some-more than a single million Chinese as well as Indians, which was a British term as well as condition for similar toMerdekafor Malaya. If a Tunku did not agree afterwards a British would substantially disagree toMerdekafor Malaya especially given they had to 'protect' a some-more than a single million Chinese as well as Indians who would differently turn stateless.
It was a arrange of trade off. Malaya would catch a some-more than a single million Chinese as well as Indians. The Chinese as well as Indians, in turn, contingency agree to special privileges for a Malays (plus Malay becomes a inhabitant language as well as Islam a religion of a Federation). And afterwards Britain would accede to Malaya independence.
In 1955, dual years beforeMerdeka, a initial elections were hold in Malaya as well as a Alliance Party (a bloc of Umno, MCA as well as MIC) won 51 of a 52 seats. That meant a Alliance Party was 'stable' as well as could order an independent Malaya with a clear mandate from a voters. Two years later, in 1957, Malaya gained independence.
But which 'honeymoon' was short-lived. Twelve years later, in 1969, a Alliance celebration received a beating in a Third General Election. It garnered reduction than 50% of a renouned votes as well as lost a two-thirds infancy in Parliament.
The Alliance Party (meaning all three: Umno, MCA as well as MIC) knew which it was losing power. Hence Barisan Nasional was shaped to replace a Alliance Party so which a antithesis parties could be brought in to a statute coalition. And which was how a Alliance Party got behind carry out of a nation -- by forming a brand new bloc with a antithesis parties (what you could call a 'unity government', you suppose).
! But whi ch was not sufficient as well as they indispensable to do more. Selangor, a valuables in a crown, was in risk (it still is today). So they combined brand new 'Malay' cities, such as Shah Alam, as well as 'flooded' these cities with Malays to 'dilute' a Chinese voters.
Then they combined a apart Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur so which a infancy Chinese in Kuala Lumpur could be 'kicked out' of Selangor. Thus a statute celebration can equates to to remove Kuala Lumpur though they would not also remove Selangor.
By then, of course, Malaysia had been combined with a agreement which 25% of a Parliament seats would come from Sabah as well as Sarawak. This would meant which Sabah as well as Sarawak would be a statute party's 'fixed deposit' as well as there was no approach 1969 could be repeated as long as Sabah as well as Sarawak remained underneath a statute party.
But which soon changed in 1985 when PBS, seen as a Christian-based party, kicked out a 'Muslim' supervision as well as transposed it with a 'Christian' government.
This meant, nonetheless again, a statute celebration was in risk of losing energy similar to what happened in 1969. And they were in risk of losing energy given a Muslims, who used to be 85-90% of a population, pre-Merdeka,had been marked down to a small 50% or so -- in a initial instance when some-more than a single million Chinese as well as Indians had been given citizenship in 1957 as well as in a second instance when Sabah as well as Sarawak became part of Malaysia as well as a Muslim race was widely separated even further.
Hence Barisan Nasional (in sold Umno) indispensable to intermix a non-Muslim population, in sold in their 'fixed deposit' states in East Malaysia which carry out a really vicious 25% of a seats in Parliament as well as where a Muslims have been not a infancy similar to in West Malaysia.
And which was when a thought was mooted to 'create' an a single some-more Muslim rac! e of dur ing slightest a single million. And they could not wait for this to occur progressively over 50 years by enlivening Malays to have some-more children. They had to 'fast track' this exercise, which equates to they had to 'import' a population.
The initial step was for Umno to get in to Sabah. The subsequent step was to 'import' a single million Muslims in to Sabah as well as give them citizenship. In 1994, this practice over those few years proved successful when a 'Christian' supervision got kicked out as well as a 'Muslim' supervision took over a state as well as has hold it ever since.
Now, certainly Dr Mahathir was Prime Minister of Malaysia during which time. But it was a Barisan Nasional supervision (which equates to it was some-more than only Umno) which came out with this game devise upon how to grab behind and/or retain energy by diluting a non-Muslim race by importing a vast Muslim population.
In 1957, they granted citizenship to a single million 'foreign' Chinese as well as Indians as well as thirty years after they 'balanced' this by extenuation citizenship to a single million foreign Muslims. There was zero bootleg about what they did though whether it was dignified or not is an additional thing altogether.
The vicious thing is, while Dr Mahathir may have been guilty of 'reversing' what Tunku Abdul Rahman did, he did not action alone. This was not a single man's devise upon how to safeguard which Barisan Nasional as well as Umno do not remove power. It was a GOVERNMENT plan, with Dr Mahathir as head of which government, of course. And you contingency recollect which in 1991 Anwar was Malaysia's Finance Minister as well as in 1993 he became a Deputy Prime Minister. And a 'Christian' supervision of Sabah was defeated in 1994.
And this happened not given of a single man, Dr Mahathir, though given of what a supervision did. And Anwar was a pass person in which supervision during which time. Hence you would be really careful abo! ut how a antithesis plays up a Sabah emanate given if a truth were to arise it may price PKR a lot of votes in Sabah. And if they can't win Sabah afterwards they can't form a subsequent federal government.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment