DAP Sabah questioned a validity of review reports submitted to Cabinet Ministers by DBKK as well as alternative applicable authorities upon Likas Bay21 purported collapsed case.
DAP Sabah State Assistant Secretary, Junz Wong voiced doubts upon a reports submitted, he pronounced how could you know a reports were valid to ensure a reserve of a office office building when a reports were submitted more than a month after after a collapsed has occurred as well as problems rectified.
DBKK reported not long ago which they have submitted a review reports to Cabinet upon 5 October upon requested by Cabinet Minister upon 2 Oct.
The purported collapsed first done open upon 28 Aug as well as investigations were usually carried out upon requested by Cabinet upon 2 Oct, NO STOP WORK assent to investigate. Works continued as usual to rectify a purported collapsed problem!
How can open trust these reports when it is in regards to open safety? It has to be rubbed as well as resolved professionally! This is open reserve regard emanate you have been traffic with! Junz stressed.
Junz disclosed which even Cabinet Minister (Dato Masidi) could not assure a office office building is safe for occupation from a reports submitted during their review via twitter.
Reply by Dato Masidi :
@MasidiM: @junzwong: it is a duty of a project consultants to lodge inform wth a authority any purported crack of law, none whi! ch i kno w was made.
@MasidiM: @junzwong : a inform was done known 1 month after d purported incident was 'exposed' & after d purported problem has been rectified.
@MasidiM: @junzwong : it is formidable to find a law when a subject matter of a purported crack has been tampered & accurate prior to inform made
@MasidiM: @junzwong: review cld usually serve a purpose if there was evident stoppage to concede 'as is' probe. Evidence left prior to inform made
There was an indication by all our commentary which consultants as well as engineers as well as applicable authorities competence have unsuccessful their professional duties. All these commentary seemed to have forked to an try to try to cover up a total law of what essentially really happened. Junz said.
For all a above reasons given, you demand DBKK as well as applicable authorities to make these reports open to infer a reserve of a office office building is indeed secured.
Its for a best interests of every party involved as well as open to finalise open concerns by disclosing these reports submitted. Junz concluded
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment