Take a new leisure of sacrament as great as dissenting view emanate as an additional example. Everyone has something to contend about that, often a non-Malays as great as non-Muslims. You hide during a back of leisure of debate to conflict Islam. You, a non-Malays as great as non-Muslims, direct which Malays-Muslims be authorised a right to leave Islam. You contend which Islam is an old-fashioned sacrament from a Dark Ages as great as any sacrament which does not concede a proponents to leave is a bad religion.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Hmmnow PAS as great as Umno have been job each alternative a celebration of devils. Actually, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed quoted a saying 'better a demon we know'. we consider what he pronounced was: 'better a demon we know than a angel we do not know'. The scold idiom is 'better a demon we know than a demon we don't'.
Nevertheless, yes or no it may be, what it equates to is: we take your chances with a great known rather than take your chances with a unknown. In short, both have been risks. But a single risk is a great known risk while a alternative is an different risk.
we suspect if we know for sure afterwards we usually go with a proven thing. You need not dabble in a unknown. However, when we have been not sure, afterwards we hang with what we know.
No doubt this ultimate turn of name-calling is about either Barisan Nasional is a better demon than Pakatan Rakyat or either Umno is a better demon than PAS. If we go by a proverb of 'better a demon we know', which would meant we know a single of a devils though we have been not unequivocally utterly sure of a other. Hence select a a single which we know.
This 'ideology' probably makes clarity in a little situations. This, howeve! r, does not request to everything. It all depends upon what we goal to achieve.
Are we articulate about a economy? Are we articulate about abuse of energy as great as corruption? Are we articulate about polite liberties as great as tellurian rights? Are we articulate about racism as great as political persecution? Are we articulate about leisure of religion? Are we articulate about clarity as great as great governance? Are we articulate about public notice as great as investor confidence?
You would be maudlin to design a package deal. You must compromise upon a little things in a interest of others. For example, PAS would offer a some-more honest as great as corrupt-free supervision compared to Umno. But PAS would be less tolerant of dissenting view as great as proselytising compared to Umno. You gain upon a single though we must be rebuilt to remove upon a other.
we have been indicted of being as well maudlin for expecting a perfect form of government. Actually, we am some-more realistic than most of we give me credit for. No, we do not make an effort for perfection. we am realistic sufficient to know which soundness is utterly impossible to achieve. What we make an effort for is a perfect shift where we can see a compromise of sorts. There have been sure things which have been priorities as great as sure things which may have to be sacrificed for a consequence of these priorities.
So what have been a priorities as great as what have been we rebuilt to scapegoat for these priorities?
During a Siege of Leningrad in a Second World War, a Russians adopted a same plan which they used to better a French 130 years or so earlier. Basically, they let craving as great as a cold better a Germans. However, this meant which Russia had to scapegoat millions of a own citizens as well. The objective as great as priority was to better a Germans. Russian civilians would have to be a collateral damage. Russia could not have both. They could not better a German! s as wel l as save their own people.
We, too, a Malaysian citizens, have sure objectives as great as aspirations. But have been we rebuilt to place these objectives as great as aspirations as a priority as great as accept a downside to whatever movement we need to take?
Malaysians wish everything. We wish an finish to Barisan Nasional/Umno rule. We know we can't do which unless a second largest celebration in Malaysia (and a Malay party, too, upon tip of that), PAS, supports us to do that. But we wish PAS upon a terms, not upon their terms.
When a single delegate to a PAS annual ubiquitous public stands up to introduce his own celebration president as Prime Minister, we go berserk. We play insults during a entire a single million members of PAS, call them Talibans, call them back village bumpkins, subject their tutorial background, subject their level of intelligence, as great as so much more. We even play insults during Islam as great as suggest which Islam is a equates to of a backwardness of Muslims in ubiquitous as great as PAS people in particular.
In alternative words, we have been revelation a a single million PAS members which they have been not matched to turn a leaders. We usually wish them to flog out Barisan Nasional as great as Umno. But we do not wish them as a leaders.
Okay, we have review what we pronounced about a a single million PAS people. It is similar to a white male revelation a non-white woman: we have been usually great sufficient for me to have sex with though we have been not great sufficient to turn my wife given of your 'colour'.
we gamble none of we looked during it in this manner. Well, which is given we have been seeking during things from usually your perspective. You have been not seeking during things from a perspective of those upon a receiving finish of your vilification as great as insults.
PAS is usually great sufficient to assistance us shift a government. PAS is not great suff! icient t o control which government. That is your summary to a a single million PAS members. Even if which is not your real message, your difference certainly give a sense which which is your message.
Do we all not stop to consider prior to we contend something? And right away which we have pronounced it how have been we starting to unsay it?
For some-more than a decade given a mid-1990s (when a Internet initial emerged in Malaysia), we have had to continue a Malay- as great as Islam-bashing, by especially a DAP Chinese supporters. And when we spoke up in defence of PAS back in a 1990s, we was whacked to dominion come. Those who were upon a late MGG Pillai's discuss organisation would know what we am articulate about.
we eventually left which discuss organisation given we realised we would never be able to remonstrate those hard-core DAP supporters which we need PAS if we have been starting to see a shift of government. It is not which I, too, had not been critical of PAS. In fact, a little of a articles we wrote criticising PAS were even published inHarakah. At least PAS is approved sufficient to concede articles which criticize them to be published in their celebration organ,Harakah.
But we criticised PAS per a little of a stands or per a strategies. we did not insult Islam or Prophet Muhammad similar to those DAP hard-core supporters in MGG Pillai's discuss group.
we confess which we did criticize a control of Muslims, which got me in to a heap of trouble with a authorities. But my critique was usually about a control of Muslims who deviate from Islamic teachings. we did not blame Islam for this control as great as contend things similar to this proves which Islam is a bad sacrament -- similar to what those DAP hard-core supporters commented in MGG Pillai's discuss group.
Many of we have probably beheld which of late we have created articles uncomplimentary of a non-Malays, in particular a Chinese. we have eve! n create d a little articles uncomplimentary of a Christians. And we know most of we usually hatred this. And we call me a racist. Some even contend that, given we am right away 62, we am trying to 'get closer' to Islam (since we am about to die) as great as we do this by whacking Christianity.
If we unequivocally hold this afterwards we have been even dumber than we thought.
It is great which we hatred this. we wish we to hatred this. we was hoping which we would hatred this. we longed for we to feel what a Malays have had to continue these last most years given a 1990s when a Internet initial came to Malaysia.
we write usually a couple of articles as great as we get so prohibited as great as bothered. The Malays have had to take what we plate out for almost 20 years. You, however, feel which we have been fit in what we do as great as which we have each right to do what we do given a non-Malays as great as non-Muslims have suffered harm in Malaysia for 55 years sinceMerdeka.
Take a new leisure of sacrament as great as dissenting view emanate as an additional example. Everyone has something to contend about that, often a non-Malays as great as non-Muslims. You hide during a back of leisure of debate to conflict Islam. You, a non-Malays as great as non-Muslims, direct which Malays-Muslims be authorised a right to leave Islam. You contend which Islam is an old-fashioned sacrament from a Dark Ages as great as any sacrament which does not concede a proponents to leave is a bad religion.
There is nothing great about Islam. Everything about Islam is bad. PAS is an Islamic party. We wish PAS to assistance us flog out Barisan Nasional as great as Umno. After which a a single million untaught PAS people can return to their villages as great as not interfere in a running of a country. And for sure we wish none of them as a tip leaders.
Do we consider we have usually won a support of a some-more than a single million PAS members as ! great as supporters?
You do not similar to me whacking a non-Malays as great as a non-Muslims? we am blissful which we feel which way. we am blissful we do not similar to being whacked. Let me share a tip with you: a Malays-Muslims also do not similar to a approach we strike them as great as Islam. And they have had to continue this much longer than we have.
Now which we know what it feels like, maybe we can reassess a situation as great as discuss it me where we go from here. Your comments per Tok Guru Abdul Hadi Awang, apostasy, leisure for Muslims to leave Islam, etc., have caused a lot of damage.
These comments were uncalled for. Worse of all, it shows which we will not even concede PAS members a leisure of debate in their own annual ubiquitous public where members have been supposed to be giveaway to discuss it their leaders what they wish for their party. And we contend which we have been fighting for liberalism? Your liberalism equates to usually a leisure for Muslims to leave Islam though not a leisure for Muslims to demonstrate what they wish or do not want.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment