I have been harboring a single worried thought all this while. Many of my friends have been pro PR. But a sure series of them have been pro PRin potentia- i.e. they have been willing to adopt a posture of anti UMNO, as long as they think UMNO can usually losein theory. But as a groundswell of anti UMNO builds up as well as they comprehend which UMNO can essentially lose, they crack up.
So while they profess to be anti UMNO, they do not wish to see a passing of UMNO. How do you explain these contradicting sentiments? At heart they still have this fright which if UMNO essentially loses out, they will be though protection.
This equates to they share a same fears as which voiced by a chairman who sent his/her a comment to my progressing article. Written in Bahasa Melayu, a chairman asked who will protect a Malays if UMNO is vanquished. We cannot rest upon DAP since it is a Chinese formed party.
I am surprise during this response. After 55 years, a chairman who sent a comment similar to some of my friends hasn't found a answer as well as has missed a point. After 55 years, you have been NOT meant to demeanour out for protection.
We have looked for a wrong thing! The idealism which you have been seeking for MUST be a ransom of a Malay mind! We should be asking what you have finished to wean a Malays from their dependency. Now, if a supervision has ruled over a Malays for 55 years as well as it has unsuccessful to liberate a Malay thoughts as well as weaned him off, as well as even if there a singular Malay asking for insurance after 55 years, this supervision has unsuccessful miserably.
< span>
Why this kind of two stairs forward, a single step backwards? People who profess to wish ransom from UMNO slip behind from a march of progress, to demonstrate slow fears?
The answer to my thoughts is since liberating ideas require a magnanimous sequence which hasn't come to delight yet. It to illustrate requires an exceedingly courageous attitude to imagine which a magnanimous sequence involving a singular supervision as a single of a principal elements is a certainty. Years of being accustomed to vital under a nation ruled by UMNO stop people from meditative which it is POSSIBLE to live though UMNO. We have to believe which there is a improved hold up though UMNO.
Liberation from mental subjugation requires courageous analyses over romantic excursions. The romantic faculties within a tellurian being is some-more grown than a cognitive or logic faculties. Emotional allegiance is simpler to secure, it requires usually an appeal to former fears. On a alternative hand, it's harder as well as longer to secure allegiance formed upon cognitive reasoning.
So what you have been going to do? We have been not going to stop though to go on presenting readers with reason as well as dialogue.
I have given a reduced answer to it. you pronounced PAS can easily fill in where UMNO stairs out. We have to comprehend which a universe does not finish if UMNO is defeated. It is not a box where all a skills required to run a nation have been usually with UMNO.
The PKR states have been run upon improved terms than all a BN states. Revenues have been rising. In Kedah, revenue from logging has increased so most folds. It used to be RM 8-10 million, right away it's RM70 million. Cash pot held by a Sel! angor su pervision is right away over RM 2 billion. It never got to some-more than RM 1 billion during all prior UMNO lead government. Most important, you do not see Malays dying in a streets for wish of protection.
The subject is essentially wrong as well as this is a premise where UMNO got it all wrong. You do not structure a nation upon a basement of protection. It is not insurance which you wish to give to Malays. We wish to liberate them, to allow them to prosper not to imprison them in subjugation as well as dependence.
The most appropriate insurance comes in a form of a order of law. Not order by group though order by law. you hope a chairman who poses a subject gets it.
After 55 years of independence, you know of a principle which differentiates a Malays from a others. Those though insurance turn those who have been improved able to conform as well as compete. Those who have been accorded insurance as well as have been reluctant to extend themselves over a box sojourn behind, disadvantaged in most aspects of life.
The subject after 55 years should not be whether you can get insurance during all. Rather a issue as well as a subject is, have been you released in thoughts as well as spirit?
Perhaps it's exegetic for us to learn a lessons from a French Revolution which provided us with a mottoLibert, galit, fraternit, French for "Liberty, equality, fraternity.
Libertyconsists of being able to do anything which does not harm others: thus, a exercise of a natural rights of each male or woman has no bounds alternative than those which guarantee alternative members of multitude a delight of these same rights.
Equality- The law "must be a same for all, whether it protects or punishes.All citizens, being next to in a eyes, shall be similarly authorised to all high offices, open positions as well as employments, according to their ability, as well as though alternative distinction than which of their virtues as well as talents."
Fraternity- Any male aspires to liberty, to equality, though he cannot grasp it though a benefit of alternative men, though fraternity
Posted by sakmongkol AK47
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment