"Religion. It's since people goal in the universe torn detached by religion."- Jon Stewart
An aged PAS palm who reads my articles inMalaysiakiniranted, "Of course, PAS sees no wrong in (PKR vice-president) Nurul (Izzah Anwar)'s speech. These days they see no wrong in anything Pakatan does when it comes to Islam."
This PAS supporter, the single of my oldest as well as dearest friends, mostly jokes which he does not belong in the 'PAS for all' stay though rsther than in the 'PAS imposed all' faction. "So, aren't we going to take your jab, Thaya?"
Well, as someone who attended the 'Islamic state: Which version? Whose responsibility?' forum as well as who has clinging space to the subject of the purpose of Islam as well as the domestic parties which generate it, we thought we would look over the "manufactured outrage" as author Salman Rushdie categorises such Islamic grievances.
What is some-more enchanting have been the numerous worried ideas which Nurul's statement raises over the emanate of constraint in the Islamic conviction as used here in Malaysia.
Under the rsther than quizzical title'Nurul not anti-Islam though the loyal Muslim',Malaysiakinisubscribers have been discerning to describe qualitative judgements upon Nurul's Islamic stance. PAS has been praised upon the nuanced response to the assault of Umno promotion as well as there has been all this folly upon how the 'quality' of the person's conviction supersedes er! emite do gma.
What just is the "true" Muslim! or "true" Christian for which matter? Someone who believes which sacrament should not be politicised? Someone who believes which we should not mock another's religion? Someone who believes which sacrament should not intrude in the in isolation lives of members in any since society? Someone who believes which there should be the subdivision of church/mosque as well as state?
These have been not "true" eremite values though rsther than loyal physical values or physical humanist values, if we like. It is pointless as well as disingenuous to try to conclude what the "true" Muslim is deliberation the actuality which said values have been in actuality anathema to traditional Islamic thought as well as generally by non-Muslims, who plan their own agendas as to the qualities which have the great or loyal Muslim.
In alternative words, the "true" Muslim as tangible by those who have been upon the receiving end of Umno-influenced Islam all these years, is the Muslim who conforms to the domestic as well as amicable conventions of the so-called assuage in front of espoused by Pakatan Rakyat.
This PAS supporter, the single of my oldest as well as dearest friends, mostly jokes which he does not belong in the 'PAS for all' stay though rsther than in the 'PAS imposed all' faction. "So, aren't we going to take your jab, Thaya?"
Well, as someone who attended the 'Islamic state: Which version? Whose responsibility?' forum as well as who has clinging space to the subject of the purpose of Islam as well as the domestic parties which generate it, we thought we would look over the "manufactured outrage" as author Salman Rushdie categorises such Islamic grievances.What is some-more enchanting have been the numerous worried ideas which Nurul's statement raises over the emanate of constraint in the Islamic conviction as used here in Malaysia.
Under the rsther than quizzical title'Nurul not anti-Islam though the loyal Muslim',Malaysiakinisubscribers have been discerning to describe qualitative judgements upon Nurul's Islamic stance. PAS has been praised upon the nuanced response to the assault of Umno promotion as well as there has been all this folly upon how the 'quality' of the person's conviction supersedes er! emite do gma.
What just is the "true" Muslim! or "true" Christian for which matter? Someone who believes which sacrament should not be politicised? Someone who believes which we should not mock another's religion? Someone who believes which sacrament should not intrude in the in isolation lives of members in any since society? Someone who believes which there should be the subdivision of church/mosque as well as state?
These have been not "true" eremite values though rsther than loyal physical values or physical humanist values, if we like. It is pointless as well as disingenuous to try to conclude what the "true" Muslim is deliberation the actuality which said values have been in actuality anathema to traditional Islamic thought as well as generally by non-Muslims, who plan their own agendas as to the qualities which have the great or loyal Muslim.
In alternative words, the "true" Muslim as tangible by those who have been upon the receiving end of Umno-influenced Islam all these years, is the Muslim who conforms to the domestic as well as amicable conventions of the so-called assuage in front of espoused by Pakatan Rakyat.
The "true Muslim" oppositional meme is the single of the contradictory aspects of the "one size fits all" beliefs of Pakatan which if left unchecked will prove catastrophic in the prolonged run.
Christian hypocrisy
Nurul's statement should be taken as the single some-more small step in the civilising routine of Islam (to steal the Christopher Hitchens phrase) which Christianity has already undergone.
This is since we have Christians who have deserted the hypocritical and/or amicable constraining values of their sacrament or during the really slightest been forced to sublimate them as well as grasp the little arrange of physical balance with the rest of society. This, of course, is the Western liberalism which former budding apportion Dr Mahathir Mohamad so fears.
The civilising routine which should ! have tak en base in this nation deliberation the colonial past as well as the infrastructure in place after independence was halted by Umno in the following years.
The delayed routine of Arabisation as well as the make use of of Islam as the tool to enthrall the Muslim population as well as as the arms to teach fright in the non-Muslim population meant which the process, which would have combined the "secular equilibrium" in this multi-religious country, was cut reduced for long-term domestic gain.
Non-Muslims played their part as well. Since the concept of "rights" was regularly tangible by eremite as well as village expectations, there was regularly never any oneness based upon the grounds which "rights" should be enjoyed as well as germane to all.
Steve Oh'sMalaysiakiniletter, (which for the little reason warranteda visitby the state's security apparatus) in await of Nurul, is loaded with the common Christian pomposity which the calcification of the Malay mind happened in an Umno vacuum.
Race politics is by the inlet conservative as well as whilst Umno used Islam for the own purposes, the same can be said of PAS, which (in the conservative nature) retreated deeper into itself propagating the thought which eremite loyalty was the panacea for Umno corruption.
Meanwhile, non-Muslim member parties were some-more than willing to toe the Umno line in sell for an unequal cut of the mercantile pie, which saw the infancy Malay village who were ostensible to be the masters of the land languish in incessant serfdom.
The Chinese village dominated the in isolation zone all the whilst enchanting in the subtl! e form o f systemic discrimination which the Umno regime sincerely used in the open sector. This fueled the Umno notice which Malay omnipotence was underneath hazard by an ungrateful non-Malay community. The racial error lines in this nation have regularly been in in between the Malays as well as the Chinese.
The whole Christian ! emanate is ! merely the healthy effect of growing territory of the generally Chinese village descending underneath the lean of the worldwide capitalist/Judeo-Christian revivalist movement, which is leading the approach in perfectionist equal eremite rights (which is their constitutional right) after years of Umno guileful every institution which was ostensible to guarantee those rights.
Always remember, the growth of the devout Christian transformation here in Malaysia happened underneath the Umno watch as well as which the nexus in in between the corridors of Umno power as well as the business village with strong links to the devout transformation was engineered during Mahathir's era, not to discuss the enlightenment of corruption as well as cronyism which benefitted the Chinese-dominated in isolation sector.
Oh, who got concerned in amemorable spatwith Josh Hong upon the emanate of Christianity as well as homosexuality inMalaysiakini, brings his own Christian assumptions to the mix.
Christian hypocrisy
Nurul's statement should be taken as the single some-more small step in the civilising routine of Islam (to steal the Christopher Hitchens phrase) which Christianity has already undergone.
This is since we have Christians who have deserted the hypocritical and/or amicable constraining values of their sacrament or during the really slightest been forced to sublimate them as well as grasp the little arrange of physical balance with the rest of society. This, of course, is the Western liberalism which former budding apportion Dr Mahathir Mohamad so fears.
The civilising routine which should ! have tak en base in this nation deliberation the colonial past as well as the infrastructure in place after independence was halted by Umno in the following years.
The delayed routine of Arabisation as well as the make use of of Islam as the tool to enthrall the Muslim population as well as as the arms to teach fright in the non-Muslim population meant which the process, which would have combined the "secular equilibrium" in this multi-religious country, was cut reduced for long-term domestic gain.
Non-Muslims played their part as well. Since the concept of "rights" was regularly tangible by eremite as well as village expectations, there was regularly never any oneness based upon the grounds which "rights" should be enjoyed as well as germane to all.
Steve Oh'sMalaysiakiniletter, (which for the little reason warranteda visitby the state's security apparatus) in await of Nurul, is loaded with the common Christian pomposity which the calcification of the Malay mind happened in an Umno vacuum.Race politics is by the inlet conservative as well as whilst Umno used Islam for the own purposes, the same can be said of PAS, which (in the conservative nature) retreated deeper into itself propagating the thought which eremite loyalty was the panacea for Umno corruption.
Meanwhile, non-Muslim member parties were some-more than willing to toe the Umno line in sell for an unequal cut of the mercantile pie, which saw the infancy Malay village who were ostensible to be the masters of the land languish in incessant serfdom.
The Chinese village dominated the in isolation zone all the whilst enchanting in the subtl! e form o f systemic discrimination which the Umno regime sincerely used in the open sector. This fueled the Umno notice which Malay omnipotence was underneath hazard by an ungrateful non-Malay community. The racial error lines in this nation have regularly been in in between the Malays as well as the Chinese.
The whole Christian ! emanate is ! merely the healthy effect of growing territory of the generally Chinese village descending underneath the lean of the worldwide capitalist/Judeo-Christian revivalist movement, which is leading the approach in perfectionist equal eremite rights (which is their constitutional right) after years of Umno guileful every institution which was ostensible to guarantee those rights.Always remember, the growth of the devout Christian transformation here in Malaysia happened underneath the Umno watch as well as which the nexus in in between the corridors of Umno power as well as the business village with strong links to the devout transformation was engineered during Mahathir's era, not to discuss the enlightenment of corruption as well as cronyism which benefitted the Chinese-dominated in isolation sector.
Oh, who got concerned in amemorable spatwith Josh Hong upon the emanate of Christianity as well as homosexuality inMalaysiakini, brings his own Christian assumptions to the mix.
Just as he objected to "counterfeit" Christianity in which exchange, we am sure there would be many Muslims similar to my PAS friend who belong to the slight understand of their holy text. Muslim as well as Christian each meditative which theirs is the some-more "authentic" interpretation.
Freedom to reject dogma
Moreover, the beauty of secularism is which it enables an open market place of ideas when it comes to eremite choice.
Now, Umno may fright this since if people had the preference in in between the sacrament which holds them to the dictates of the state (as it is used here in Malaysia) as well as the sacrament which allows them the freedom to reject convictions though the permit of the state, which do we think would be the some-more appealing choice?
Therefore, in the field of competing religions it would be profitable for the emanate of constraint to be addressed so which the business of winning hearts as well as minds could go upon unabated. May the best sacrament win, so to speak.
Of course, if the state played no purpose in enforcing religion, nobody would feel constrained to leave it, though which is the tragedy of religion, all of it is the same though with different labels. The demon is in the details as well as though the civilising process, nobody - positively not an racial organisation tangible by their sacrament - gets to subject which part of convictions to accept or reject.
This is since Pakatan (with the s! trong PAS backbone)engagingwith the Christian village is vitally important. This nonsense about not politicising sacrament is the reason since Islamic appeasers have helped in the stagnation of the Islamic faith. The only approach to resolve eremite differences is by acknowledging them (in great faith) as well as from these tensions, secularism is the healthy by-product.
The Umno state has the corner upon Islam, which during the end of the day, means which any one with an bulletin of proselytising would get the reduced end of the stick. Understand now, which my in front of is whi! ch peopl e should be exposed to the diverse operation of ideas or agendas as well as have their sensitive preference as to what to accept or reject.
The large subject is, will Pakatan relinquish this monopoly? Will it disperse those eremite institutions which "shackle the Malay Mind? Will certain action policies which have been closely linked with Malay/Muslim identity as well as which have contributed to the desert enlightenment be dropped?
Freedom to reject dogma
Moreover, the beauty of secularism is which it enables an open market place of ideas when it comes to eremite choice.
Now, Umno may fright this since if people had the preference in in between the sacrament which holds them to the dictates of the state (as it is used here in Malaysia) as well as the sacrament which allows them the freedom to reject convictions though the permit of the state, which do we think would be the some-more appealing choice?Therefore, in the field of competing religions it would be profitable for the emanate of constraint to be addressed so which the business of winning hearts as well as minds could go upon unabated. May the best sacrament win, so to speak.
Of course, if the state played no purpose in enforcing religion, nobody would feel constrained to leave it, though which is the tragedy of religion, all of it is the same though with different labels. The demon is in the details as well as though the civilising process, nobody - positively not an racial organisation tangible by their sacrament - gets to subject which part of convictions to accept or reject.
This is since Pakatan (with the s! trong PAS backbone)engagingwith the Christian village is vitally important. This nonsense about not politicising sacrament is the reason since Islamic appeasers have helped in the stagnation of the Islamic faith. The only approach to resolve eremite differences is by acknowledging them (in great faith) as well as from these tensions, secularism is the healthy by-product.
The Umno state has the corner upon Islam, which during the end of the day, means which any one with an bulletin of proselytising would get the reduced end of the stick. Understand now, which my in front of is whi! ch peopl e should be exposed to the diverse operation of ideas or agendas as well as have their sensitive preference as to what to accept or reject.
The large subject is, will Pakatan relinquish this monopoly? Will it disperse those eremite institutions which "shackle the Malay Mind? Will certain action policies which have been closely linked with Malay/Muslim identity as well as which have contributed to the desert enlightenment be dropped?
Meritocracy is the fine thought though how would it be imposed upon the domestic as well as amicable landscape built upon the injustices as well as detachment of the Malaysian open still playing the competition game?
Nurul's watershed thought is not which Malays/Muslims should be exposed to alternative ideas or religions generally since, those ideas/religions in my perspective have been soul cages in their own ways, not to discuss the agendas during play, which would be deleterious to the multicultural/religious Malaysia.
Her watershed thought is which she is following in the footsteps of those reformers who have been some-more advanced the inner dialogue inside of Islam. This frequency concurred tradition, which is nearly regularly met with hostility, is the many subversive of movements since it relies upon the reinterpretation of convictions which has regularly been the zealously rhythmical province of those hardliners who mantle themselves in loyalty which is the new fascism.
Propagandist likeThe Starjournalist Joceline Tan may label her as the "little kid with large ambitions" though this "kid" in her nascent domestic hold up has advanced the domestic as well as amicable discourse some-more than the aged uncles who inhabit the corridors of Umno power.
Nurul's watershed thought is not which Malays/Muslims should be exposed to alternative ideas or religions generally since, those ideas/religions in my perspective have been soul cages in their own ways, not to discuss the agendas during play, which would be deleterious to the multicultural/religious Malaysia.Her watershed thought is which she is following in the footsteps of those reformers who have been some-more advanced the inner dialogue inside of Islam. This frequency concurred tradition, which is nearly regularly met with hostility, is the many subversive of movements since it relies upon the reinterpretation of convictions which has regularly been the zealously rhythmical province of those hardliners who mantle themselves in loyalty which is the new fascism.
Propagandist likeThe Starjournalist Joceline Tan may label her as the "little kid with large ambitions" though this "kid" in her nascent domestic hold up has advanced the domestic as well as amicable discourse some-more than the aged uncles who inhabit the corridors of Umno power.
What stays to be seen is whi! ch will Pakatan as well as politicians similar to Nurul have the event which federal powers allows to spin rhetoric into deed.
What would conclude her as the "true" reformer she claims to be, is which she does not back down from this controversy. She does not waffle in the face of eremite pomposity as well as she continues to agitate the Islamic standing quo since as prolonged as the thought of constraint is propagated, protestations of "quality" have been meaningless.
What would conclude her as the "true" reformer she claims to be, is which she does not back down from this controversy. She does not waffle in the face of eremite pomposity as well as she continues to agitate the Islamic standing quo since as prolonged as the thought of constraint is propagated, protestations of "quality" have been meaningless.
S THAYAPARAN is Commander (rtd) of the Royal Malaysian Navy.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment