Do we need to take over a sovereign supervision prior to we can contend a right things? Do we need to take over a sovereign supervision prior to we can discharge abuse of energy as good as crime in a state government? Do we need to take over a sovereign supervision prior to we can come to a accord as good as come out with a usual policy?
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
we have friends who similar to to go fishing. (A couple of people we know also similar to to go hunting). we asked them as to since they bother to rubbish so most time fishing. It is also not cheap, thoughts you. The plunge in to costs utterly a bit of money, generally when we remove a lures (which price more than a fish). Would it not be easier as good as cheaper to only go buy a fish during a market? It would be faster as good -- fishing 'expeditions' can take a whole day.
One day they invited me to join them in their fishing trip. In an hour we held 56 fish. That is roughly a fish a notation amongst a 5 of us. we contingency contend it was utterly exciting. we proudly brought a fish we held home to uncover my wife. we did not discuss it her that which was a only fish we caught, though.
You see, for a initial half hour or so, we was prosaic out upon a rug of a vessel due to an attack of faintness (which we suffer from if a vessel is not moving as good as rolls from side to side). we was vomiting my guts out as good as polluting a sea. Only when my fishing friends carried me over a side of a vessel as good as threatened to drop me in to a sea did we stop vomiting. It seems a fastest approach to finish your faintness is to get dumped in to a sea. we contingency contend it worked. The hazard was good enough.
It was afterwards that we accepted that a fad was not in! a cooki ng as good as a eating of a fish. After all, how could 5 of us eat 56 fish anyway? It was a fad of a hunt or a chase, as they say. And that goes for 'people hunting' as well. Friends who go 'hunting' in a clubs upon Saturday night discuss it me a same thing. It is not about getting a women in to bed. If not afterwards they only need to go revisit a brothel. It is a fad of a 'hunt' -- to see either we can 'nail' your 'prey'.
What would we consider of that woman if we smile during her as good as she rught away walks up to we as good as says 'you can poke your pecker in to my pussy any time'? That would be a turn off. You need to sweet-talk her initial -- such as 'what's a good woman similar to we we do in a place similar to this?' or 'what's a woman similar to we we do in a good place similar to this?', etc. Then we suggest to buy her a drink, ask her if she would similar to to dance, as good as afterwards ask her if she would similar to to extend to somewhere 'quieter'.
In that same context, we need to make a politicians as good as political parties 'hunt' or 'fish' for a votes. They need to 'court' us to get us to opinion for them. If we discuss it them that they have been guaranteed a votes as good as come hell or high H2O we would still opinion for them that will make them complacent.
They contingency not take us for granted. We have been not prostitutes. They can't only chuck a little money onto a bed as good as design us to strip as good as distortion down upon a backs so that they can screw us. If they wish us afterwards they will need to work tough during wooing us.
As what we told Anwar Ibrahim in London in 2010, in a 2008 ubiquitous choosing many of us would have voted for a dickey or a monkey as prolonged as they stood upon a height of Pakatan Rakyat. However, we have given seen what these monkeys as good as donkeys have incited out to become. Some have forlorn a opposition. Some have been not performing as we had hoped. Some proved to be a! s hurtfu l as a Barisan Nasional people we kicked out. Some have been making silly statements that do not help a antithesis cause as good as actually helps Barisan Nasional. Some have demonstrated arrogance. Some have been pretentious as good as condescending as good as speak to us as if they have been a betters rsther than than a 'servants'.
At this indicate of my essay a little of we 'apologists' have been starting to scream that we can't design perfection. We can't design Pakatan Rakyat to grasp all in a small 5 years. If we can give Barisan Nasional 55 years afterwards since can't we also give Pakatan Rakyat 55 years prior to we decider them?
These apologists tend to dont think about that a leaders as good as politicians from DAP, PKR, as good as PAS have been not five-year-old politicians. The antithesis politicians have been around a prolonged time, as prolonged or longer than those from Barisan Nasional. Some have served as Cabinet Ministers (even a little from PAS during a time that PAS joined Barisan Nasional 40 years ago). Some have been Chief Ministers (Menteri Besar). Nik Aziz is probably a second-longest portion Menteri Besar after a Sarawak Chief Minister.
So a antithesis leaders as good as politicians have been not 'new'. Why contingency we give them 55 years? We contingency not forget, when they campaigned for a support as good as a votes, they told us what was wrong with Barisan Nasional as good as they told us what they were starting to do to right all these wrongs. Hence they knew what was not right as good as they knew what to do to put it right.
They betrothed us, not we betrothed them. So it is their pursuit to broach upon these promises.
The other excuse a apologists suggest is that Pakatan Rakyat is not nonetheless a sovereign supervision so we can't design them to grasp most until they take over a sovereign government. Granted in a little cases this is true. But this is not loyal for everything.
Do we need! to take over a sovereign supervision prior to we can contend a right things? Do we need to take over a sovereign supervision prior to we can discharge abuse of energy as good as crime in a state government? Do we need to take over a sovereign supervision prior to we can come to a accord as good as come out with a usual policy?
Not all requires we to be a sovereign supervision prior to we can do it. Many things have been celebration matters. Many things have been bloc matters. Many things have been state supervision matters. Many things have been legislature matters. Some things, of course, have been sovereign matters. But not all is a sovereign matter.
Is a preference of possibilities a sovereign supervision matter? That is a celebration make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a grant of seats a sovereign supervision matter? That is a bloc make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a choosing or preference of legislature members a sovereign supervision matter? That is a state supervision make a difference (and motionless by a party, thoughts you) as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a declaration of assets a sovereign supervision matter? That is a celebration make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a placement of tithes (zakat as good as fitrah) a sovereign supervision matter? That is a state supervision make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a building of low-cost homes for a homeless a sovereign supervision matter? That is a state supervision make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a grant of state land to a landless a sovereign supervision matter? That is a state supervision make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
Is a abolishing of negotiated tenders as go! od as a implementation of an open tender system for state contracts a sovereign supervision matter? That is a state supervision make a difference as good as has zero to do with a sovereign government.
There have been many things that have been celebration matters, bloc counts and/or state supervision matters. You do not need to wait for for until we form a sovereign supervision prior to we can do something about them.
Take a Islamic State as good as Hudud make a difference as an additional example. Do we need to be a sovereign supervision prior to DAP, PKR as good as PAS can come to an agreement upon that issue? You do not even need to be a state supervision prior to we can come to an agreement upon this.
Barisan Nasional would not dare make known their possibilities until a sunrise of Nomination Day. This is since Barisan Nasional does not certitude a own members as good as they know that if they make known their possibilities as good early afterwards there would be a genuine danger of inner sabotage. Hence they wait for for until a eleventh hour to make known their possibilities to revoke a danger of inner sabotage. Even afterwards it still happens, as Barisan Nasional not long ago confessed.
But since does Pakatan Rakyat not make known a possibilities early so that these possibilities can begin working a ground as good as a voters can get to know them early instead of finding out who they have been during a final notation upon a sunrise of Nomination Day? Well, for a same reason since Barisan Nasional does not dare make known a possibilities early, as good as for an added reason -- to equivocate Barisan Nasional buying them off.
Hence Pakatan Rakyat does not certitude a own possibilities as good as it does not certitude a own celebration members. Pakatan Rakyat is disturbed that if a possibilities have been voiced as good early afterwards it might suffer inner harm and/or a possibilities might get bought over.
What, therefore,! does th is contend about a candidates? Are these a people we want? If 'A' is chosen to contest instead of' B', afterwards 'B might harm 'A' or Barisan Nasional might buy off 'A'. And if 'B' is chosen instead, a same thing might occur as well. Hence do not make known nonetheless either it is 'A' or 'B'. Wait until a final notation to make a announcement.
Is this since Pakatan Rakyat is not nonetheless a sovereign government? Would nothing of this occur once Pakatan Rakyat is already a sovereign government?
Pakatan Rakyat needs to remonstrate us that it is estimable of a vote. Pakatan Rakyat contingency work for a vote. If we discuss it Pakatan Rakyat that we have been definitely starting to opinion antithesis never thoughts what they do or do not do, afterwards we have been starting to have a really complacent as good as really quiescent Pakatan Rakyat.
There have been no guarantees in life. There is no pledge that every a single of we reading this essay is starting to still be alive tomorrow. If we do die tonight, there is no pledge that we have been starting to go to sky or to hell. In fact, no a single can give we a money-back pledge that sky as good as hell even exist.
So how can we pledge Pakatan Rakyat a votes? In a initial place, should we even be giving anyone this guarantee?
If we wish me afterwards come as good as justice me. Bring me flowering plants as good as chocolates. Take me out to dinner. Come meet my relatives as good as move me to revisit your parents. Then we will decide either we have been starting to get in to my pants. If we merely wish a wham bam, appreciate we ma'am, afterwards go revisit a brothel.
And if we have been a prostitute oneself as good as have been rebuilt to prostitute oneself yourself, good as good as fine. But do not design me to do a same only since we have been we do that. If we can't remonstrate me to opinion for we that is your problem, not mine. If we do not know how to win my opinion ! afterwar ds we do not deserve my vote. That is a prolonged as good as short of it all.
we am not here to offer a politicians. It is a politicians who contingency offer me. So offer me. And remonstrate me that we have been estimable of being my servant. we need not remonstrate we of anything since a opinion is in my hand, not yours.
As a child said to a girl when he forsaken his pants to uncover her his dick: we have this, that we need. And a girl forsaken her knickers to uncover a child her pussy: ah yes, though with a single of these we can get ten of those.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment