November 2, 2012
Transcript: Top UMNO Spinner Nazri speaks to a Press
by The Malaysian Insider
De facto Law Minister Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz pronounced which he sees no complaint with his son driving bureau workman Michael Chia's Hummer SUV.
He pronounced which if a certain Opposition figure (name withheld due to authorised reasons) is not disturbed about a leaked video purportedly depicting himself having a tryst with a unfamiliar sex worker, afterwards there is no reason given he should be.
Reporters had questioned Mohd Nazri during his bureau after a claim upon a Hummer was unprotected by PKR leaders during a Parliament run today (November 1).
The full twin follows:
Nazri:He (Rafizi Ramli) got no area standi.
Reporters:(Batu MP) Tian Chua as well as (Ampang MP) Zuraida (Kamaruddin) were there also.Then bring him to Parliamentlah.
We can uncover a stuff which they (PKR) have done.
I saw. If it is an corruption Ask Tian Chua to ask me If it is an office, inform to a Police If we have done any offence, inform me to a MACC.
Basically they usually pronounced it is a dispute of interest.
Who asked a questions?
All 3 of them (Zuraida, Tian Chua as well as Rafizi).
No, no, in Parliament, who asked a question?
First time was Tian Chua (who raised a issue) in question-and-answer session.
Then who is a Minister in-Charge of so, who give me a question?
They have been observant if your son has links with Michael Chia, afterwards we should not hav! e stood up as well as urge them
No, no, no. I'm a Minister. I've got no personal interest. When he asked which question, we didn't even know what subject was coming. It was (the) committee-level debate.
There was additionally (a) created answer if I'm not mistaken.
That (question was answered) underneath my name, of course, as well as what dispute of seductiveness do we have? we do not have any dispute of interest.
And we have no carry out over a MACC. we can't tell a MACC to dump cases. They have been independent. So given we have no energy to do that, how can we be bribed? we cannot do something which they wish me to do.
And in Parliament, we contingency understand, answers come from a MACC, not from me. we do not even know which when they asked about Michael Chia, a answer came from a MACC, we do not even know which Michael Chia was not arrested, though a answer came from a MACC. we do not know anything.
What about a claim which we were articulate upon behalf of (Hong Kong's) Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), observant which a ICAC has privileged them of a charges?
That's a answer from a MACC. You see, a system, we know what, initial of all, we do not even know a questions which were starting to be asked given it was not planned, it was committee-level debate.
When we was answering, they stood up as well as asked me. So I'm a Minister, we have to answer. The answer all came from a MACC.
Okay, all things aside, whether or not a automobile is registered underneath Michael Chia's name
we do not know. It is in in in between my son as well as Michael Chia Anyway, if my son drives a automobile of Michael Chia, what has which got to do with me? What has which got to do with me? He is not a child next twenty-one years old, he is an adult.
They have been observant which Dato Seri Shahrizat has claimed a same thing as well as right away it has ! caused h er
Yeah, that's what they have been trying to do though what have we done? we do not know.
But a thing is, we see, even yet we can contend which it is not
your fault, zero to do with we as well as all that, though when it comes out in media, we know how a public would perspective this kind of it doesn't receptive to advice nice
It doesn't be concerned me a bit. (laughs)
Like Shahrizat's case, she said: "I do not know anything about my father "
That's father as well as wife. we do not nap with my son. I'm not happy (reporters laugh). My son is not my wife, my son is not my lover, we do not nap with him.
What he does, he doesn't tell me. It is different from father as well as wife, okay? Why have been we so worried?
Not to contend worried; I'm usually observant which it does not receptive to advice nice in public, afterwards a public as well as people will begin talking.
Let it be, let it be. You pressWikipedia, 'Nazri Aziz', what come out? All sorts of things. I'm still a Minister, my friend, okay? It is not starting to hurt me a single bit. I'm not affected by gutter politics.
Do we know Michael Chia?
I know him also. You see, there contingency be this difference, okay. If I'm a High Court judge, as well as Michael Chia appears prior to me as well as my son drives his car, afterwards I'm in trouble.
I'm not a decider in Michael Chia's case. I'm not even a investigator. The MACC is (the investigator) in Michael Chia's case. I'm a Minister replying in Parliament.
They claimed which a ICAC has not privileged (Michael Chia), as well as a ICAC sealed a box given they didn't get any team-! work fro m Malaysia, from a MACC.
No, no, it was a donation This one, we do not ask me. You contingency ask a Attorney-General's Chambers, we contingency ask a MACC.
You know I'm not their spokesperson. we usually replied what they gave me. They have been eccentric body, we got no carry out over a MACC, we got no carry out over a AG. So how can we be conversion them.
I can't as well as all those replies in Parliament, we know, have been answers given by a MACC, not my personal answers.
You contingency understand a system. The A-G as well as a chief government official of a MACC, they cannot crop up in Parliament, they have got no area standi.
You have been a spokesperson?
With their consent. All my answers, anything about a MACC as well as AG's Chambers, all from them like people who get angry with me (when) we pronounced secular state. That's AG.
People get angry with me given we contend Pati (illegal migrants) in Sabah is not a threat. That is confidence councilpunya jawab(answer).Kalau PM jawab,PM kena marah. I'm okay, we have no problem. It's part as well as parcel of my job.
Asde facto Law Minister, nonetheless usually celebration of a mass out answer from different agencies, do we see yourself influential given your reply carries weight ?
I'm a unequivocally influential person. I'm a unequivocally influential man. There's no doubt about it, unequivocally critical too.I'm not scared during all, we did zero wrong. Those replies came from Parliament. we was merely doing my job, discharging my duties as well as responsibility.
So we won't consider suing Rafizi then?
What for? Let him be a wail blower. Anyway, we do not unequivocally wish to answer him given he's not an MP.
I think if Tian Chua was there usually to let him (Rafizi) have a matter during (the) Parliament (lobby), given he's not a part of of Parliament, he can! not have a matter here, he's usually a wannabe. Make sure you're an MP first, afterwards come to speak to me.
Anyway, even in a Parliament, (during) debates Ketua Pembangkang (Opposition Leader), that's my level. But of course, MPs ask me, they ask. But this guy, no way.
If a single day, he enters Parliament as an MP, he'll bash you.
Suruh dia masuk parliament dulu la. (Tell me him to come in Parliament first). we do not wish to bob low as well as understanding with him, okay. But given we all come as well as ask, we usually saylah. It's not even a mosquito bite. I'm sorry. If we all come here meditative I'll be upset, far from it.
But do we know about a Hummer?
That's in in in between my son as well as Michael Chia. we know Michael Chia.
So we endorse Hummer unequivocally exists
Kalau dia nak bagiHummerke, Ferrarike,itu Michael Chia punya pasal lah, bukan bagi dekat I(If he wants to give a Hummer, or a Ferrari, that's Michael Chia's business. He's not giving it to me). I'm a Minister, not my son, okay?
So we endorse which a Hummer unequivocally exists.
Buat apa nak confirm. Gambar dah ada. You pergi tanya anak I.(Why should we endorse it? The cinema have been there. You go ask my son. As I've said, we do not nap with my son, okay? I'm not happy as well as I'm not incestuous.
Do we see a complaint (with a fact) which your son (drives) Michael Chia's car?
Why is it a problem? It's in in in between him as well as Michael. Go as well as find Michaellah. Go as well as find Michael.
As I've said, we do not nap with my son, okay? I'm not happy as well as I'm not incestuous.
Do we see a complaint (with a fact) which your son (drives) Michael Chia's car?
Why is it a problem? It's in in in between him as well as Michael. Go as well as find ! Michael< em>lah. Go as well as find Michael.
Is there a problem?
You can ask himlahif there's a problem. we do not drive a car. Mine is WVJ 6. Everyday we come here, WVJ 6. Wealth, feat as well as justice. Some people contend 'wisdom', we do not wish (wisdom).
***You cite resources to wisdom?
I cite wealth. That's given I'm rich. we can means a lot of things though certainly it's not NFC's (National Feedlot Corporation's) money.
I know we do not care about gutter governing physique as well as which this is not even a mosquito punch to you. But do we think this emanate would mistreat BN in a election?
Why mistreat BN? Why BN? What about (an antithesis figure's) design screwing (a) Chinese prostitute oneself oneself as well as all that? That a single do not mistreat is what is happening to me worse than that? Huh? Is it worseah? Is it worse?
If (the Opposition figure) is not worried, given should we be disturbed about this? Your design all over town, in a cyber world, f***ing this prostitute oneself oneself from China. He's not worried, given should we be concerned about this. You can allude to me upon this.
You ask me if I'm worried, upon whether it will mistreat BN. What I'm observant is which this design of (the Opposition figure) screwing this Chinese prostitute oneself oneself starting all over a cyberworld, he's not worried. My subject is: should we be worried?
(Question inaudible, muffled by other reporters' chatter)The approach we answer
I do not care. Why have been we so worried?
I need to endorse again, we know (of) a Hummer?
No need, a cinema have been there. You go ask my son. we cannot be obliged for my son. we do not screw him, we do not nap with him. He sleeps with his wife, he's got a kid. So whatever he does, we do not know. we know Michael Chia, I'm not worried.
If a a! llegatio ns unequivocally exist?
Go inform to Policelah. Why do we (hold) a Personal Computer (press conference)? Right or not? You know anything about me, given we have PC? Publicity seekerlah, poor publicity. Go inform Policelah, MACC.
If your son is unequivocally guilty
Guilty of what?
If he unequivocally committed
Committed what? Do we know what we have been articulate about? Committed what? Kiss a girl?
Conflict of interest?
Conflict of interest? But he is not a Minister.
But he is associated to you.
He's my son. we have no energy over MACC. we have no energy upon A-G's Chambers. How can I? And all those questions, answers, came from MACC. How can we be compromised? we cannot be compromised.
It's not my answer, it's a answer of SPRM. You contingency understand that. It's not my answer, all these answers have been from MACC. If we pronounced Michael Chia was not arrested, which was a answer from MACC, not me. I'm not a investigator, we didn't investigate. If A-G said, if we answer in Parliament which ICAC has already sealed a case, which is a answer from A-G's Chambers. Not my answer.
I see your point.
So do not worry, I'll still be around.
But you're not starting to mount in elections, right?
What has this got to do with aiyo It's not connected, a question. That's given when we see me, when someone asks (me a subject in Parliament), we mount up as well as a we demeanour around, given I'm watchful for a answer from a officers. It's not my answer.
Are we concerned which your son as well as his family have been being I'm a abounding man, I'm powerful, good looking. (reporters giggle) Wealthy. So what can we do? My son ask, 'Pa, is it' we say, 'Look, we have been my son.' Will we lodge a Police inform upon your son being followed? Why should I? It doesn't be concerned me. I'm popular, we have a movie starpunyastatus here we know? Celebrity.Bukanfilm star local, Hollywoodpunya(laughs). No, though there is zero we can do, (if) they wish to follow. And if Rafizi lodges a inform with MACC? What kind of subject it that? He wants to report, he reportlah. You know, he's a clarinet player, he told me in his tweet. In Malay College (Kuala Kangsar), when he (enrolled), we was not around, though those who fool around a clarinet arejambu,you know.Ni jambu punya character la.
followed?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment