M Manoharan (DAP-Kota Alam Shah) today lifted eyebrows when he queried if fellow celebration member as well as exco in charge of internal supervision Ronnie Liu, would renounce if a argumentative 29-storey common ownership by Dolomite nearby a dedicated Hindu site in Batu Caves, is not scrapped.
"Are you ready to renounce if this plan is not stopped? Because it threatens Hinduism, a caves which have been millions of years aged as well as a church there which is over 100 years old," he asked during subject time during a Selangor Legislative Assembly this afternoon.
Responding, Liu (wearingyellowin pic) said a emanate of his resignation was a non-issue as a state supervision has made transparent its intention to end a project.
"But you contingency stop it in a veteran demeanour with reasonable fact because you understand which advertising for a plan has begun as well as 60 percent of units ! have been sold.
"There is a large likelihood which a state or sovereign supervision will need to provide compensation so it has to be done a right as well as veteran way.
Thus, this was why atask forcewas shaped to demeanour into a matter.
"Therefore a emanate of resignation does not movement because Pakatan's stance is which you do not wish projects which threaten (heritage sites).
Earlier, Liu had als! o taken a appropriate during a sovereign supervision for dogmatic which a plan would bescrappedif BN wins Selangor in a next general election, in anxiety in Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's revisit to Batu Caves on Deepavali Day.
"We wish to do things professionally, not similar to a politicians on a alternative side who acknowledgement to throw it without justification.
"If a budding minister as well as his minister are! sincere ! about cancelling it, they could have used their (federal) powers to do it by revoking a developer's looseness or cancelling its sales as well as selling permit," he said. Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment