YOURSAY'In an essay dirty with attacks upon a opposition, we have not explained a elephant in a room - because was a income smuggled?'
In defence of Sabah Umno's RM40mil
Multi Racial:As MP, it is Abdul Rahman Dahlan's duty to scold a wrong. But instead he wrote an essay to praise Sabah CM Musa Aman as great as to clear Sabah Umno's RM40 million 'donation'.RM40 million is a lot of income as great as nobody would give such income without awaiting favours in return. In other words, this is crime money.
If what Musa Aman as great as Sabah Umno did is not stopped as great as corrected, all hell will break loose in this country. Corruption will be legalised.
TU:Abdul Rahma! n's essay sounds to me similar to a massive wall of content to clear smuggling. What is strong here is Umno's common diversion tactics.
Instead of explaining because a income had to smuggled into a nation in a suitcase, Dahlan goes upon as great as upon - similar to a damaged jot down - about a antithesis as great as them not divulging their donors.
The spotlight is upon Umno. Why try to obstruct attention to a opposition. You can see in almost every paragraph, a difference "opposition" or "PKR" crops up.
Telestai!:Abdul Rahman, you're fortifying a indefensible. With an essay dirty with attacks upon a opposition, we have not explained a elephant in! a room - because was a income smuggled?
On top of that, a income was in Singapore currency, nonetheless an additional dubious circumstance. We would have been some-more free if a banking was in US dollars, being a fungible currency, or Hong Kong dollars, a internal currency.
Talk is cheap, as they say, but your buddy's bagman was caught with a self-evident smoking gun. So Abdul Rahman, we will do great by staying divided from this disturbance as great as let your friend (Musa Aman) insist himself.
Anonymous #58437020:There is so much filth about a leaders of Sabah as great as Sarawak in all kinds of media across a universe that really shortly these two jokers will be some-more important than theWilliams as great as a Middletons.
For Pete's sake, we do not have to go around a mulberry bush to tell us this. You think we have been idiots? Hello, have we ever walked in a Sabah timberland prior to we start spilling such defence for Musa Aman?
Don't we all know that it's all partial of his domestic ploy? Don't think Malaysians have been stupid.
Speechless:Abdul Rahman, in your article, because is there not a cheep upon a mainstream media's attack upon tellurian rights organisation Suaram, accusing it of receiving unfamiliar donations?
And because is there a need to "smuggle" income into a nation if there is nothing wrong? Why not TT (telegraphic transfer) a income in as great as have all upon top of board? Your essay has some-more holes than my kitchen sieve.
Unspin:! Abdul R! ahman wants us to hold that a RM40 million was all there was to it with regard to domestic funding for Sabah Umno.
I beg to talk about for this elementary reason: If a single wanted to lift RM40 million in cash, wouldn't it be ! some-mor e prudent to do it in mixed tranches so that if for a little hapless reasons, a single mislaid a income or got robbed, a single would still have a residue of a funds?
The actuality that they smuggled RM40 million income in a single tranche showed that it was just "loose change" to them i.e. (1) no big understanding if something went wrong, as great as (2) there was a lot some-more where that came from.
Starr:Abdul Rahman, a central issue at palm is a origin of a donation, that was a unlawful joist 'kickbacks' in lapse for extenuation of logging rights over Yayasan Sabah concessions.
If a source of a concession was finished in a ordinary course of commercial operation as great as properly accounted for, nobody would have queried it. The actuality that it was 'siphoned off' to Hong Kong as great as smuggled behind undeclared smacks of an component of crime as great as income laundering.
The income was exchanged in Hong Kong following a inking of a logging stipulate between Yayasan Sabah as great as a Hong Kong-based Malaysian businessman. The subject here is, because was i! t necessa! ry to sign a stipulate in Hong Kong?
The Sabah CM was pronounced to have led a group of Yayasan Sabah officers to transact a understanding there. Why a secrecy, if all was upon top of board? It's tantamount to plundering as great as thieving a wealth of a state.
Tholu:Abdul Rahman, a actuality of your belief that we can so simply fool a thousands of readers ofMalaysiakiniitself proves your dim-wittedness.
After a dismal opening of Umno-BN in a final GE, a clarion call by BN was to shift as great as renovate their condescending approach towards a citizenry. Has it changed? Apparently not!
It is still deeply buried in a static state of denial. It still doltishly, as great as to a own detriment, thinks it can kee! p upon f ooling a rakyat. Pakatan as great as a rakyat have not changed their opinion upon a RM40 million. They know it is not income donated for domestic support.
The governor of Hong Kong is not in a robe of donating income for domestic campaigns of parties outside a shores. It is definitely hurtful income for certain tall profile individuals. Pakatan Rakyat is actually personification along Umno's claim that it is actua! lly donat! ion income to see how distant it will lie to cover up a hurtful practices.
Spinnot:"It is not illegal for any Malaysian to give income to a domestic party of his or her choice - or to anybody for that matter," says Abdul Rahman.
We all know that. Now tell us something we do not know - because did a income end up in Hong Kong, in unfamiliar banking as great as had to be smuggled into Malaysia by a Chinaman?
Anonymous_3e86:The income donated to DAP comes from well-wishers as great as supporters within Malaysia. It was not smuggled into a nation distinct a RM40 million, that was in Singapore dollars. If we send RM40 million from my Maybank comment in Petaling Jaya to DAP's account, a transaction is legal.
Even if we were to lift a income as great as deposit it into DAP's comment it is still legal. But a Central Bank must be told if a single is to physically bring out of any nation such outrageous volume of money.
Otherwise, such acts have been considered "money laundering" if a source of a income is not known.
Anonymous_5f! b:So many great things finished by Musa Aman, nonetheless Sabah remains a single of a lowest state. It's ironic to contend a least.
Before that, we seldom encounter Sabahans in Semenanjung. Now they have been so many in a streets that we often mistake them for unfamiliar labour.
Say what we like. Set up an RCI (royal commiss! ion of i nquiry) to rabble a issue out, if we dare. By a way, have been we sure Umno's audited accounts include this RM40 million fund?
Not Confused:Abdul Rahman, we repeat once again - no a single is, we think, suggesting that donations to domestic parties cannot be made, right? It's a strong underhand approach in that this sold concession was made.
In vast description notes, carried secretly in a suitcase from Hong Kong. Is there any wonder that suspicions have been lifted as to a source as great as contingent customer of such a questionable act?
No a single in BN has nonetheless explained because a "donation" was done in this way, rather than in a required bank-to-bank electronic transfer.
Fair&Just:The nation's debt is over RM500 billion, unrealised hidden debt around RM200 billion, as great as a government has on trial an additional RM100 billion in debts. How did a debt accumulate to such celestial figures as great as how to repay these debts with such crime as great as malpractices around? - Malaysiakini Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment