Fairness Of Court Judgements Come Into Question


http://panel.mustangcorps.com/admin/fl/upload/files/pengadilan(1).jpg
Why were they even charged with attempted attempted attempted murder in a initial place? This was self defense. Where was a representation (mens rea?) to commit attempted attempted attempted murder or to kill someone?
OutSyed a Box


They contend a law is an ass. Looking during a little of a judgements being passed by a Courts, may be a little of a Judges have been asses too. There contingency be consistency as good as fairness in how sentences have been meted out.

Yesterday a box of a dual Indonesian brothers (who have been usually twenty-two as good as twenty years old) who were condemned to cling to for causing a genocide of a aroused bandit who pennyless in to their room as good as afterwards pounded them captivated my attention. we suspicion it was strange (and grossly unfair) which a victims of a aroused bandit who were dismayed from nap as good as had to urge themselves would be condemned to death.

What were they ostensible to do? Wait for a bandit to kill them first?

First here is a crux of a story from The Star.

  • SHAH ALAM: Two Indonesian brothers sent to gallows by High Court after found guilty of murdering burglar.
  • Frans Hiu, 22, as good as Dharry Frully Hiu, 20, were charged ! with com mon goal in a attempted attempted attempted murder of 26-year-old R. Khartic during a shophouse in Sepang upon December 3, 2010.
  • witness saw Khartic mangle a during a behind of entrance after he failed to mangle front door.
  • entered roof as good as fell in to room where brothers as good as co-worker sleeping.
  • The criminal afterwards pounded a men
  • Frans repress Khartic by retaining him from during a behind of until he stopped moving.
  • After realising which Khartic had become still, a brothers ran out of a unit.
  • In her short judgment, Justice Nurchaya Arshadruled which a prosecution had successfully proven a box beyond in accord with doubt as good as condemned a group to death.
  • The brothers were a usually ones who testified in their own defence.
What is a meaning of -"in her short judgement"? How short is brief?Two tellurian beings have been being deprived of their lives. we positively hope a Court gave more substantial consideration than usually a'brief judgement'.

Thentoday it was more enlivening to review which a few organisations had oral up against this judgment of death. We appreciate Allah which there have been people who have more conscience in a country. Again here is The Star :

Groups: Review genocide sentence
  • PETALING JAYA: groups calling for legal examination genocide judgment upon dual Indonesian charged with murdering burglar.
  • National Crime Prevention Foundation vice-chairman Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye said a judgment was as good extreme
  • implications upon a approach people react to their own person! al reser ve as good as security.
  • Lee saidincident concerned illegal entry in to bureau building encouraged by criminal intent.
  • "normal for a occupants to react spontaneously to antagonist who pose danger to them,"
  • Bar Council VP said genocide judgment unwarranted.
  • "People have a right to self counterclaim in life-threatening situations,"
  • Gasing Indah Rukun Tetangga authority Eric Chew described judgment as shocking. "People right to self counterclaim has now come in to question."
  • TTDI Resident Association authority Mohd Hatim Abdullah said a legal examination was required in perspective of a need for self-defence.
I agree with Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye, a Rukun Tetangga people as good as a VP of a Bar Council. It is quite ridiculous. Why were they even charged with attempted attempted attempted murder in a initial place? This was self defense. Where was a representation (mens rea?) to commit attempted attempted attempted murder or to kill someone?

The 3 guys were inside their room. A criminal tries to mangle in, initial by a front door, afterwards by a during a behind of door. He finally climbs by a roof as good as falls in to a room. There is so most integrity - a criminal really wanted to mangle in. Then he attacks a 3 occupants of a room. One of a occupants runs away. The alternative dual urge themselves, there is a struggle, a fight as good as a bandit dies. Now a spoliation victims have been condemned to death?

Why not assign them usually with assault which carries a lesser judgment instead of murder?Malas nak memikir ke? If you ask me a dual young boys should be set free. They have been usually twenty-two as good as twenty years old.

Karthic a twe! nty-six year aged bandit came from far with a clear vigilant of robbery, assault as good as even murder. The dual young boys were going about their business earning an honest living.

Folks, afterwards we review even more intolerable news. This is about those ruthless Somali pirates who were arrested upon a high seas as good as brought during a behind of to Malaysia. we knew this arrest of a Somalis was a rubbish of a time as good as money. Here is a design of a happy Somali pirates as good as a news. That a single male is usually laughing away.



  • KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here rejected a guilty defence of a seven Somalians accused of shooting during Malaysian Armed Forces personnel during a spoliation in a Gulf of Aden.
  • The Somalians had non-stop fire during a troops personnel
  • The seven have been facing an alternative assign which is punishable by hold up in prison, or a limit 14 years in jail, whilst a strange assign carries a imperative genocide penalty.
Here a seven Somalis were clearly partial of a bandit boat. They had complicated weapons as good as they had shot during alternative tellurian beings with a obvious vigilant of causing death. And nonetheless they have been not being charged with vigilant to means death. They have been facing an "alternative" assign which usually carries a limit 14 year sentence.
!
On a alternative hand a dual trusting Indonesian brothers have been condemned to cling to for defending themselves from a aroused robber?

Here is a single more box in a writings :

  • SEREMBAN: A house painter was condemned to 6 years prison by a Sessions Court here Friday after he pleaded guilty to causing a genocide of a Nepalese male in Rantau here, final year.
  • Judge Datin Nursinah Adzmi additionally systematic R.Jayaganesan, twenty-six to serve a judgment from a day of his arrest, which is additionally a day of a incident.
  • Jayaganesan was charged with causing a genocide of Prem Bahadur Tamang, 32during a robberywhich occurred in Jalan Ulu Kanchong, KM8 Jalan Tampin, Rantau, during about 8.40pm upon October thirteen final yearunder Section 304 (b) of a Penal Code which carries a limit prison term of 10 yearsor fines or both upon conviction.
The Nepali Prem Bahadur Tamang lost his life, brutally murdered by a aroused robber.And a killer is condemned to 6 years prison only?

Why was this ruthless bandit NOT charged underneath a Section of a law which carries a imperative genocide judgment - like a assign against a dual Indonesian boys? Why assign him underneath a Section which usually carries a 10 year sentence? And a Court gave him a 6 year judgment only?

Where is a probity for Prem Bahadur Tamang which a bandit who killed him violently is usually jailed for 6 years? The judgment runs from a date ! of his a rrest. With a single third of a judgment reduced for public holidays, weekends, great behaviour etc a male will be out in another 3 years.

And where is a probity for a dual Indonesian boys who weresentenced to genocide when they shielded themselves againstanother aroused bandit ? Maybe like Prem Bahadur Tamang a dual Indonesian boys should additionally have let themselves get killed. Then Karthic a twenty-six year aged bandit would be condemned to 6 years prison only.

Maybe Karthic, twenty-six as good as R Jayaganesan additionally 26, would have been sent to a same prison where they can sell notes upon how to sack as good as kill tellurian beings as good as get divided with it. Just go to a Malaysian Courts.

This usually does not receptive to advice right during all. This raises critical doubts about a Attorney General's bureau as good as a ability of a Malaysian Courts to decide matters with justice. Let us not compound a error. Let those dual Indonesian boys go.
Posted by
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: