UMNO is regularly trying to ambush as well as put up red herrings to divert people's attention. Why for example, is a hudud emanate in between PAS ad DAP being finished in to a large thing? This is a sideshow being elevated to a premier status complete with intellectual shimmer from uncle tom-ing academics.
PAS as well as DAP- they work on opposite principles. PAS champions Islamic principles as well as Islamic agenda. DAP champions secular democratic principles as in probity as well as equivalence as well as great governance as well as all that. Both cooperate on usual grounds.
Why is UMNO pushing a crowd in between a two? UMNO should be seeking out for MCA which has ridiculed UMNO's position on Islamic agenda.
Sometimes you think UMNO eremite luminaries have been not which bright. UMNO is in energy now. MCA which is a party of infidels work closely with UMNO so UMNO labels them friendly infidels ( kafir Zimmi- infidels who accepts a authority of Muslims in power). What does which prove? It proves a sequence of infidels is a duty of who is in power. That is how UMNO plays a game.
Suppose now, a brand brand new supervision comes in to power. The leaders of a supervision have been additionally Muslims. DAP who will emerge as a dominant Chinese upheld party works closely with PR. The DAP represents a brand brand new infidels who accept a authority as well as leadership of a brand brand new PR government.It makes them friendly infidels. DAP right divided becomes kafir zimmi.
So ustaz ustaz- a branding of infidels is therefore a duty of which side in in energy d! uring wh ich particular time.And by which time, if you were to apply a UMNO stance, MCA will turn kafir harbi which makes a slaughter of a MCA people permissible?
UMNO itself has no bulletin about hudud laws. PAS isn't creation hudud as a overriding political agenda. Why should Muslims bother about how DAP thinks about how a Malays want to rehearse Islam. Since when is Islam contingent on a thinking of non-Muslims? Muslims should be clear about this- a predestine of Islam depends on them. Not on non Muslims. So because should you place a shortcoming of articulate about hudud on DAP?
Its leadership is fundamentally non-Muslim. It never finished itself as a party championing eremite issues. So when Tunku Abdul Aziz expressed disappointment about hudud as well as other Islamic issues not being discussed in DAP meetings, you can't hold which he's so nave. Why should non-Muslims speak about Islamic issues? If he was a DAP clamp boss then, because wasn't he outspoken about it? And if you want to be meant about it, you can speak all night long about Tunku Aziz's Islamic credentials over some bottles of Johnny Walker.
The people who should do a articulate have been UMNO as well as PAS. UMNO isn't articulate about it. So where is UMNO in all this?
Let's speak some-more about Najib's mercantile agenda.
The early indicators showing which Najib is all speak when it comes to mercantile strategies, is his government's inability to curb spending. He hasn't finished any transformation actually. It's all large talk. His transformation equates to increased supervision spending, approach supervision impasse in a economy including owning a equates to of production or you do business through substitute companies. We have been led t! o ask, d oes Najib understand what he is doing?
I know he has usually a single mercantile strategy. Pay his way though. Spend to buy votes. It's all suit with no substance of creating a fundamentals of mercantile growth. This includes nurturing organic growth as well as reducing supervision interference.Teaching Malays for e.g. of receiving personal shortcoming over their own affairs as well as seeking out for nonessential supervision wasteful spending.
If he wants to transform a economy- he should desert his from cradle to grave mercantile strategy. He's giving out income to people which of march have been an immediate highlight reliever. But in a long run, it snuffs out a drive in people reducing them to trusting beneficiaries of giveaway lunches.UMNO is creating a worker owner-slave mercantile relationship.
What does he meant for e.g. by New Economic Model? Once on a time, you asked him about his NEM- he said it was market driven mercantile affirmative action. you suspicion it was unplanned capitalism or which extemporaneous intentional cooperation in between mercantile actors. It wasn't any of that- it is a same aged plan of selecting close friends as principal business agents. It's a same Mahathirnomics of selecting as well as selecting winners who valid in a end, they have been all his surrogates as well as front men.
Spending has taken up a large proportion of a national income. By spending, you meant open spending- i.e. by a government. The supervision spends by creating debt instruments- borrowing from banks as well as arising supervision bods. Public spending has reached roughly 50% of a national income as well as yet supervision leaders boot a meaningful warnings. That shows they have been bad mercantile managers.
For all his speak especially about a brand brand new mercantile model, Najib hasn't changed divided from a cradle to grave mercantile strategies. He is you do what Roosevelt did with his New Deal.
Here Najib is regularly you do a brand brand new deal. The understanding is in a money! Spend baby spend is his mantra.
Posted by sakmongkol AK47
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment