PAS's in front of has never altered all those years -- it supports a doing of Hudud. DAP's in front of has additionally never altered all those years -- it opposes a doing of Hudud. However, in 1990, DAP refused a matrimony with PAS. In 1999 it entered in to a marriage. In 2001, it asked for a divorce. In 2004, it refused a marriage. Then, in 2008, it again entered in to a marriage.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
No hudud without constitutional change, says MP
(Bernama, 28th Jul 2012) - PAS's finish to exercise hudud law in a nation was unfit unless a celebration is initial able to rectify a Federal Constitution, according to a DAP lawmaker today.
DAP national authority Dr Tan Seng Giaw, who is additionally Kepong part of of parliament, pronounced it was not easy to rectify a constitution as it compulsory a two-thirds infancy in Parliament.
"To exercise hudud, there must be an legislative addition in Parliament. They know it is unfit to get a two-thirds infancy in Parliament," he said.
He pronounced which to date, a Syariah Criminal Law Enactment (II) 1993 (Hudud Law) upheld by a Kelantan State Assembly in 1993 could not be enforced.
He pronounced this when asked to comment upon a make a difference by Kelantan Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, who is additionally PAS devout leader, who reiterated upon Wednesday a party's mount to uphold a struggle for hudud although it was not concluded to by DAP.
According to Tan, a hudud emanate was a formidable a single generally in a nation which was finished up of a plural multitude as great as it should not have been raised.
"Let's not raise counts which can cause disorder generally upon those which cannot b! e implem ented," he said.
Meanwhile, Yayasan 1 Malaysia authority Dr Chandra Muzaffar pronounced which PAS's mount upon hudud despite not getting DAP's determine showed both a parties had most differences as great as were not in concert.
Chandra, who is additionally International Movement for a Just World (Just) president, pronounced a parties usually co-operated since they had a common rivalry who prevented them from seizing energy during a state as great as federal levels.
"This shows which their attribute is opportunistic since they wish to be in energy as great as for no alternative reason," he said.
********************************************
(22nd September 2001) - In a shock decision today, a DAP announced a withdrawal from a antithesis Barisan Alternatif coalition, citing unsuited differences with fellow part of PAS over a Islamic state issue.
In an emergency meeting this afternoon, a party's senior manager executive cabinet resolved to quit a BA, with thirteen votes in foster of a withdrawal, dual against as great as three abstentions.
The motion was: "In perspective of a disaster of DAP as great as PAS to finalise a Islamic state controversy, a CEC resolves which it is no longer defensible for DAP to continue in a Barisan Alternatif as great as a DAP ceases to be a part of of a Barisan Alternatif."
********************************************
(31st Jul 2002) - Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin of Terengganu has inked his approval of a PAS state government's most debated Syariah Criminal Offences Enactment after being briefed upon a check final week.
According to Terengganu Menteri Besar Abdul Hadi Awang's press secretary Zahari Mohd today, a Sultan gave his determine after conference explanations from state ministers final Thursday.
"Before a Sultan signs any legislative addition to a state constitution, a! state g overnment is compulsory to give a necessary explanations upon a law," pronounced Zahari when contacted.
The bill, which evoked strong critique from assorted quarters, was upheld by a state public during a sitting upon Jul 8.
********************************************
The Hudud emanate will usually not go away. Back in 1993, a PAS-Semangat 46 State Government of Kelantan upheld theSyariah Criminal Law Enactmentin a Kelantan State Assembly. This was a single of a reasons since DAP refused to form a bloc with PAS in a 1990 General Election. DAP feared which PAS would exercise Hudud if they won a election.
In a 1990 General Election, Semangat 46 had a single bloc with DAP upon a West Coast calledGagasan Rakyatand a apart bloc with PAS upon a East Coast calledAngkatan Perpaduan Ummahor APU. Hence a antithesis -- PAS, DAP as great as Semangat 46 -- faced a 1990 General Election with dual opposite coalitions.
Six years later, in 1999, DAP came together with PAS as great as Parti Keadilan Nasional to form a bloc calledBarisan Alternatif.By afterwards Semangat 46 had been wound up as great as most of a leaders had left behind to Umno.Barisan Alternatifactually did quite great in a 1999 General Election where they not usually defended Kelantan though won Terengganu as well. They additionally won 45 seats in Parliament.
Actually, 1999 was not a most appropriate opening for a antithesis in conditions of Parliament seats. In 1969, a antithesis won 49 out of 144 seats (34%) and, in 1990, 53 out of 180 seats (29%). In 1999 it was usually 23% of a seats in Parliament. Of course, 2008 was a most appropriate ever during 82 out of 222 seats, which came to roughly 37%.
Now, when DAP concluded to an antithesis bloc in 1999, they knew which PAS intended to exercise Hudud. PAS had, in fact, attempted to do so 6 years earlier in Kelantan. Hence PAS has never dropped a Is! lamic ag enda. So DAP went to bed with PAS with a eyes open.
Then, shortly after a 1999 General Election, PAS did a same in Terengganu. And this resulted in DAP withdrawal a antithesis coalition,Barisan Alternatif.In 2004, DAP faced a general choosing outside a antithesis coalition. And which was a worst opening for a antithesis in Malaysian political history. They were marked down to usually 21 out of 219 seats in Parliament, or 9.6%.
The antithesis most got demolished.
In 1990, DAP did not wish to go to bed with PAS since of Hudud. And, in 1993, DAP was proven right when PAS pushed for Hudud in Kelantan. In 1999, DAP concluded to go to bed with PAS in annoy of these same concerns. Then, dual years later, DAP asked for a divorce for a really same reason -- Hudud. In 2004, DAP went solo. In 2008, DAP, again, concluded to a matrimony with PAS.
PAS's in front of has never altered all those years -- it supports a doing of Hudud. DAP's in front of has additionally never altered all those years -- it opposes a doing of Hudud. However, in 1990, DAP refused a matrimony with PAS. In 1999 it entered in to a marriage. In 2001, it asked for a divorce. In 2004, it refused a marriage. Then, in 2008, it again entered in to a marriage.
While DAP as great as PAS have both been really unchanging in their stands per Hudud, a same cannot be pronounced about their attribute -- exclude a marriage, come in in to a marriage, find a divorce, exclude a remarriage as great as finally get remarried.
PAS has always finished it transparent which it is excusable to a matrimony even if DAP is against to Hudud. DAP, however, pronounced it refuses a matrimony unless PAS initial agrees to dump a Hudud agenda. PAS never did dump a Hudud bulletin as great as DAP concluded to a remarriage in annoy of that.
Although DAP can be pronounced to be really unchanging in a antithesis to Hudud, it has not demonstrated a same consistency per a mount of n! o matrim ony unless PAS initial drops a Hudud agenda.
we expected DAP to announce which it is going to withdraw fromPakatan Rakyatif PAS does not determine to dump a Hudud bulletin -- similar to DAP did 10 years ago when a same emanate cropped up. But DAP is not doing this. Instead, DAP is observant which PAS is forgetful as great as which it can never exercise Hudud unless it initial amends a law in Parliament as great as to do this PAS will need a two-thirds infancy in Parliament, which it can never have for obvious reasons -- a reason being PAS will never win two-thirds of a seats in Parliament when they have been contesting usually one-third a seats.
Now, we have been observant this since some-more than 10 years ago. But when we pronounced this some-more than 10 years ago we was met with infamous resistance. The mount afterwards was if PAS does not determine to dump a Hudud bulletin afterwards DAP must not go to bed with PAS. Karpal Singh pronounced which DAP would not even lay during a same list with PAS, let alone form a bloc with which Islamic party. Then, in 2008, they relented as great as entered in to an antithesis bloc which included PAS.
The incident has never changed. It is still a same. PAS is committed to Hudud while DAP is against to Hudud. So what is it which has altered instead? Why was Hudud an emanate in 1990, 1994 as great as 2004 though not in 1999 as great as 2008?
Okay, right away DAP says it is not an emanate since it cannot be finished even though this is still a bulletin (or dream) of PAS. But it could not be finished behind in a 1990s either. And it could not be finished in a 2000s as well. So what has changed?
Back in 1999, we pronounced never mind if PAS talks about Hudud. They can usually speak about it. They can never exercise it since they will initial need to rectify a law as great as to do this we need a two-thirds infancy in Parliament. And since PAS is an Islamic celebration they need to speak about! it. If they do not speak about it afterwards they will turn irrelevant. An Islamic celebration which drops a Islamic bulletin would stop to be an Islamic party. If we force PAS to dump a Islamic bulletin afterwards we would be permitting Umno to kill it.
But when we pronounced this we got whacked great as great as proper. This was not an evidence which was excusable to a Chinese, in sold those DAP supporters. But right away it appears which evidence is excusable after all. In fact, which is a same evidence which a DAP leaders have been using.
Why have been a DAP leaders right away observant what we pronounced some-more than 10 years ago? What has changed? What is a incident right away which was not a incident some-more than 10 years ago? When we contend which we get called all sorts of things. But when a DAP leaders contend a same thing this is political wisdom.
we still recollect what a DAP supporters pronounced behind in 1999. They were officious nasty with their comments. It became so bad which we withdrew from any serve discuss upon a matter.
Even a late MGG Pillai was troubled about a total thing. He told me which a DAP supporters have so most hate in their hearts which they have been beyond reasoning. The most appropriate thing, suggested Pillai, was to avoid these people just as great as allow them to live in their own small world. Uncle Lee as great as Mr Chee can substantially describe what happened since they were following a debates during which time.
So be careful with what we say. The nasty things we pronounced behind in 1999 have come behind to haunt you. You right away need to eat your difference since what we have been observant currently was just what we pronounced behind then. And a nasty things we have been observant currently might additionally come behind to haunt we a little time in a future. You might be forced to contend a little of a things we am observant currently with regards to assorted issues.
That ! is what happens when we use sentiments as great as emotions instead of reasoning to disagree your case. You finish up doing a U-turn as great as finally contend a same things we were vigourously against to some-more than a decade ago.
we love it when we have a final word as great as can say, "I told we so!"
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment