I suspect at a finish of a day it's all about money. So we need to be an ex-Mufti prior to we verbalise up as well as tell Muslims a truth. While we have been still a 'sitting' Mufti we will keep your large mouth shut. This is a same with ex-Barisan Nasional people who stick on Pakatan Rakyat. They verbalise a lot usually after withdrawal BN to stick on PR. Before that, not a cheep from them.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
"What we wish to see is a multi-party democracy where, each dual or three years, a [leading] celebration will change," pronounced Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan in an talk inThe Guardian.
"We're not averse to Barisan entrance back though if parties consider they're going to lose power, they behave a lot better. "[This] is about energy entrance back to a people. It's about us (the people) being in charge," Ambiga was quoted adding.
READ MORE HERE:http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/50524-ambiga-bersih-about-people-power-not-regime-change
Raja boleh dikritik, kata bekas mufti
Tokoh Islam terkenal, Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin, mendakwa raja tidak kebal dari kritikan dan mesti bertanggungjawab terhadap tindakan mereka mencetuskan kemarahan di laman sosial Twitter selepas beliau mengeluarkan kenyataan yang dikaitkan dengan kritikan terhadap keluarga diraja baru-baru ini.
Bekas mufti Perlis itu yang kini merupakan zamalah pelawat di Universiti Oxford memuji British kerana menyemak perbelanjaan keluarga diraja dan memastikan mereka bertanggungj! awab ter hadap pembayar cukai. Menurut Dr Asri, langkah ini baik untuk mencegah penyelewengan.
Dalam tulisan bertajuk "Mereka Paling Mencegah Kezaliman Raja", beliau menyatakan, walaupun keluarga diraja British memberikan sumbangan besar dalam sejarah negara tersebut, mereka (keluarga diraja) tidak dibiarkan untuk berbuat sesuka hati.
READ MORE HERE:http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/raja-boleh-dikritik-kata-bekas-mufti/
It appears similar to Ambiga has a same thoughts as me, although she may have not quite used a same words as we did. we as well said, ideally, we should not have a same supervision for more than dual or three terms. After dual or three conditions we should shift a government, even if only for a heck of it. In fact, we additionally pronounced which a CEO (PM as well as MBs/CMs) should, by law, usually be in bureau for dual terms. After dual conditions they get a hell out.
I additionally pronounced a politicians do not fright God. Hence it is pointless to try to put a fright of God in to our leaders. What they do fright is losing power, more than they fright God. Hence, if they have been subjected to a fright of losing power, they will behave themselves. This is a usually way to make politicians behave themselves. If not they would turn conceited as well as dishonest.
The politicians contingency additionally be done wakeful which we a people have been a boss, as well as which they work for us. We hire them. We can fire them. We additionally pay their salaries. Power contingency be in a hands of a people, not in a hands of those who rule over us. The supervision contingency fright us, not we who fright a government.
Anyway, we can await what Ambiga pronounced deliberation which we pronounced only a same thing! most ti mes, although when we contend it they whack me to kingdom come.
The next point, which we do not consider we need to contend as well much, is regarding a ex-Mufti of Perlis's matter which it is okay to criticise a Rulers. we consider we have already talked about this issue so most times so no need for me to repeat myself. we am only glad which a Mufti now appears to determine with me although a alternative Muftis have been keeping still -- mainly since they need to go on to consequence their salaries as well as suffer their perks.
I suppose, at a finish of a day, it's all about money. So we need to be an ex-Mufti prior to we verbalise up as well as tell Muslims a truth. While we have been still a 'sitting' Mufti we will keep your large mouth shut. This is a same with ex-Barisan Nasional people who stick on Pakatan Rakyat. They verbalise a lot usually after withdrawal BN to stick on PR. Before that, not a cheep from them.
Finally, on a a single million Malaysians vital overseas. It seems usually 20,000 of a a single million Malaysians vital abroad have been purebred voters. This means even if a supervision allows abroad Malaysians to opinion it will do no dammed good.
And there we were accusing a supervision of denying abroad Malaysians their right to vote. How can we repudiate a right to opinion of someone who is not purebred to vote? That's a problem, we scream a lot as well as make so most noise as well as accuse a supervision of all sorts of things. Now a supervision says which abroad Malaysians can opinion though they still cannot opinion since they have been not purebred to vote.
It creates me wonder if we have been criticising a supervision since we really wish to see shift or since we only similar to criticising a supervision for a fun of it, arrange of similar to getting an orgasm through masturbating. We accuse a supervision of denying Malaysians their right to vo! te. But if we have been not purebred to opinion then we have no right to vote. So how can a supervision repudiate we your right to opinion when we have no right to opinion in a initial place since we have been not a purebred voter?
Malaysians have been so full of shit.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment