That night, after everybody had been seated, Dr Mahathir during a 'main table', Nik Aziz suddenly walked in to a gymnasium unannounced. No a single knew he was coming. In fact, he had not even been invited. But he is a Menteri Besar of which state as well as Dr Mahathir is a ex-Prime Minister of Malaysia. So Nik Aziz longed for to 'pay his respects' to Dr Mahathir by attending a cooking even yet they did not entice him.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Kit Siang says does not hatred Dr M yet rejects 'Mahathirism'
(The Malaysian Insider) - Lim Kit Siang today denied harbouring hatred for his long-time domestic rival Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, suggesting instead which he dislikes a influential leader's brand of politics.
In a escalating fight of difference between a domestic veterans, a DAP parliamentary personality a single after another to allege which Dr Mahathir has been operative very tough to keep his "Mahathirism" alive in a ruling Umno by crime as well as cronyism.
Lim additionally disagreed which former budding minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was voted out of energy for mistreating his prototype Dr Mahathir, observant instead which Abdullah, or "Pak Lah", had mislaid in Election 2008 for unwell to dismantle a Mahathir bequest of corruption, cronyism as well as abuses of power.
"He (Dr Mahathir has) stoked secular fears among a Malays with his warnings which Malays will remove energy if Umno loses a subsequent ubiquitous election," a maestro statesman pronounced in a matter here.
Lim combined which a country's longest serving budding minister had additionally serve incited secular tragedy by claiming a entrance 13th ubiquitous choosing would be about ! competit ion as well as which Chinese electorate would be a kingmakers in a polls.
"(These) exhortations have been not usually untrue, most agitator as well as rarely provocative, yet totally against 5 decades of Malaysian nation-building, his ownVision 2020ofBangsa Malaysiaand Najib Razak's1 Malaysiaconcept," he said.
The Ipoh Timor MP was responding to Dr Mahathir's exclusive interview with an online portal yesterday where a former budding minister had pronounced he "did not know given he (Lim) hates me so much" as well as combined which attacks from a antithesis celebration would usually bolster ruling supervision BN.
Despite timid in 2003, Dr Mahathir continues to loom large over a Malaysian domestic landscape as well as has been seen as Barisan Nasional's (BN) lead campaigner of late, ahead of polls which contingency be called soon.
But Lim has regularly rubbished Dr Mahathir's assertions as well as in new weeks, indicted Umno of "playing a dangerous game of lies" by stoking fears which could split Malaysia along secular lines in a bid to win over Malay electorate during a polls.
He pronounced electorate contingency choose between a supervision which promotes secular policies as well as a single which espouses democracy, great governance as well as equitable mercantile practices in a entrance ubiquitous election.
Lim has additionally claimed which Najib's uncertainty in winning a subsequent ubiquitous choosing has resulted in "desperate" tactics by Umno leaders as well as strategists.
Today, Lim urged all Malaysian electorate to unite as well as prove Dr Mahathir's assertions wrong.
"The lapse of Mahathirism is deserted conclusively as well as decisively to send out a transparent summary which a 13GE is not about competition yet about a destiny of a united, harmonious, only as well as progressive Malaysia," he said, adding "(where) corruption, cronyism as well as abuses o! f energy have been relegated to a dustbins of history".
******************************************
"Let me assure Mahathir which you do not hatred him during all yet you am against to Mahathirism," pronounced Lim Kit Siang. Now Kit Siang is observant what you said, although he has not utterly put it a way you did. Basically, according to Kit Siang, this is not about hating Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad yet about hating what he stands for. you suppose, as a Christians would say, hatred a sin, not a sinner.
Is Kit Siang a bucket of bullshit? Are Christians a bucket of bullshit? you do not consider so. you consider what they contend makes sense. And I, too, contend a same thing. And what you pronounced was: this is not only about propagating ABU (anything yet Umno). It is about rejecting anything which smacks of Umno culture.
Now, for a benefit of those who do not assimilate English which well, let me explain what this means.'This is not only about ABU'means kicking out Umno is not enough. It does not meanDO NOTkick Umno out, as most of you have interpreted this to mean. We need to exterminate a enlightenment which has brought Malaysia down to a level it is during now. And you do not want to see this same enlightenment in a antithesis as well. Hence those in a antithesis who perpetuate this same enlightenment need to additionally be rejected.
you do not hatred Islam. you do not hatred any sacrament for which matter. What you hatred is what a little Muslims do, generally when they hide behind Islam in you do all this as well as tell us which they have been you do this in a name of Islam. Do you not contend often sufficient which Muslims have been Islam's biggest enemy? Muslims control themselves in ways which bring ridicule to Islam.
Another thing you always do, when you hatred someone you reject what this chairman says even if he or she says a right thing. For example, you have alw! ays pron ounced which you hatred these snap elections. you feel which a antithesis should not be 'ambushed' with a ubiquitous election. This is not fair to a opposition. It catches them off-guard.
Furthermore, when no a single knows when a choosing is starting to be held, everybody is in choosing mode. Hence each day is choosing debate day. This is a waste of profitable resources. Everyone spends his or her time campaigning instead of spending this time using a country.
you feel which a date of a elections should be set during each 5 years given this is fundamentally what a Federal Constitution of Malaysia says contingency be done: elections contingency be hold each 5 years. Hence, given a last ubiquitous choosing was hold upon 8th Mar 2008, afterwards a subsequent a single should be hold upon 8th Mar 2013, as well as afterwards 8th Mar 2018, as well as so upon compartment a end of time (or until Parliament changes this to once each 4 years or six years or whatever).
This would meant you do not need to outlay 4 or 5 years campaigning. We can start campaigning, say, in January of choosing year, around three months or so prior to a elections. Then you can outlay a rest of a time using a country. Currently, no a single is using a country. Everyone is only campaigning, expecting a elections 'any day now'. And you have been campaigning given 9th Mar 2008, a day after a last ubiquitous election.
Now, this is what Nazri Aziz is proposing. But given you hatred Umno as well as Nazri, you balderdash what he says even yet what he says is good. you agree with this idea. you have, in fact, been observant this myself. Fix a date of a ubiquitous elections. And set this date as each 5 years -- 8th Mar 2008, 8th Mar 2013, 8th Mar 2018, etc. That is a correct thing to do, as even Nazri Aziz appears to consider so.
So given strike Nazri? We strike him not given he pronounced a wrong thing. We strike him even if he says a right thing. And this is given he is 'the ! enemy'. Tun Dr Mahathir is additionally 'the enemy'. Hence when Marina Mahathir says a right thing you additionally strike her. We strike her given she is Dr Mahathir's daughter. We hatred Mahathir so you additionally hatred Marina. Hence even if Marina says a right thing you strike her.
Five years or so ago, prior to a Mar 2008 ubiquitous election, Dr Mahathir visited Kota Baru in Kelantan to give a talk. That night they threw him a dinner. Nik Aziz Nik Mat, a PAS Menteri Besar, told a media which if he were invited to a cooking he would attend.
But they did not entice him.
That night, after everybody had been seated, Dr Mahathir during a 'main table', Nik Aziz suddenly walked in to a gymnasium unannounced. No a single knew he was coming. In fact, he had not even been invited. But he is a Menteri Besar of which state as well as Dr Mahathir is a ex-Prime Minister of Malaysia. So Nik Aziz longed for to 'pay his respects' to Dr Mahathir by attending a cooking even yet they did not entice him.
There was a be scared as well as a insane hasten as their searched for an dull chair to spin a ten-seat list into an 11-seat table. And Nik Aziz sat next to Dr Mahathir. Nik Aziz is not usually a Menteri Besar. He is additionally deliberate anulama(religious scholar). And he demonstrated how a Muslim should control himself.
You contingency remember which Dr Mahathir incarcerated Nik Aziz's son, Nik Adli, underneath a Internal Security Act (ISA).And they incarcerated him but trial for 5 years. Nik Aziz was very saddened by this as well as he pronounced which he would never pardon those people responsible for this injustice. you personally met Nik Aziz as well as spoke to him about it.
Yes, Nik Aziz would never pardon those who incarcerated his son. And a male who incarcerated Nik Adli was Dr Mahathir. Yet Nik Aziz insisted which he accord Dr Mahathir a respect due to an ex-Prime Minister of Malaysia. Nik Aziz longed for to! uncover respect to a male who he pronounced he could never pardon for detaining his son.
Is Nik Aziz a hypocrite? Is Nik Aziz not upon foot a talk? Why does Nik Aziz want to uncover respect to a male he pronounced he could never forgive, a male who incarcerated his son? Nik Aziz was not invited to a dinner. The cooking was in honour of Dr Mahathir. Why worry to attend, generally given he was not invited?
We Malaysians still have a long way to go to reach domestic maturity. Our governing body is a governing body of hate. And which is given most could not assimilate given you upheld Anwar Ibrahim behind in 1998 when they arrested him as well as threw him in jail.
"You do not like Anwar," pronounced Anwar's classmate, Haji Hamid. "You have been very vicious of Anwar. You would be a last chairman you would expect to be using a Free Anwar Campaign." The Special Branch which incarcerated me in April 2001 pronounced a same thing. "Why have been you supporting a male you have been vicious of?" they asked me.
All these people only do not understand. you may be vicious of Anwar. But you am even some-more against to what they did to Anwar behind in 1998. you felt which what they did to him was wrong. Hence you longed for to debate for his recover given you courtesy his bonds as an injustice. The actuality which you remonstrate with Anwar upon most things does not make his bonds acceptable. And a actuality which you remonstrate with Anwar upon most things does not stop me from playing an active purpose in looking his release.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment