Do we cruise all these PKR people have been saints? Do we cruise which they have been right away starting in to 'confession mode' because, as they claim, they have been people of element who cannot be bought? Come on! These people refused a RM5 million offer, which is true, though they refused a RM5 million suggest given Hee was paid RM25 million. So given have been they being offering usually RM5 million? Why not RM25 million similar to Hee?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
what really engaging is a 360 grade spin by Mr. rpk as review to couple of years back.. it can confirmed right away which Mr. is a apparatus of BN to win behind a heart as well as essence of your supporters to behind a BN supervision as well as show a immorality political vendetta play by a antithesis to disprove a PM. we used to apply oneself as well as admire your courage to quarrel corruption as well as abuses though right away we have been aiming your gun towards a opposition. The energy lies with a supervision of a day as well as many of a abuses as well as a indiscretion have been from them. What have been RPK is starting soothing toward a government. He knows improved than us his ground behind this screen of mezzanine of power. Care to explain your reader?.....comment bysword of samuraiin a articleInspector Clouseau, where have been you?
***********************************
Dear 'sword of samurai', initial of all, we owe no a single any explanation for what we am doing, not you, not any alternative reader. What we do is my business. In 2007 as well as 2008 when we criss-crossed Malaysia to verbalise in antithe! sis orga nisedceramahwhy was this question not posed? Are we posing this question usually given we perceive, as we said, we have done a 360-degree turn? Hence no a single needs to be questioned as to his or her ground if he or she is seen as ancillary a opposition? This chairman usually needs to be questioned if he or she is viewed as ancillary a government?
Can we see a hypocrisy as well as stand in standards of antithesis supporters? If we await a antithesis it is given we have been a noble chairman who is we do God's work as well as is unfailing for heaven. If we await a supervision it is given we have been a crook who has been paid for off as well as have been unfailing for hell. It is positively impossible which we await a supervision for noble reasons as well as we await a antithesis given we have been paid money.
This is exactly a approach religionists work as well. Either we have been with me or we have been a enemy. If we follow me we will go to heaven. If we don't follow me we will go to hell. we am right. All others have been wrong. Mine is a loyal religion. All others have been false religions. Go verbalise to religionists, in particular those from a Abrahamic faiths, as well as see what they say. Even within any sacrament there have been various sub-groups or sects. And any sub-group or group will contend theirs is scold as well as all others have been wrong. Only they will go to heaven. All others will go to hell.
Yes, which is how humankind thinks. And we as well cruise no differently.
There is essentially no such thing as a 360-degree turn. 360 degrees is a initial as well as final point upon a compass. Hence, if we spin 360 degrees which would mean we have not incited anywhere. You have been still starting in a same citation which we were creatively going. You need to do a 180-degree spin to pierce in a conflicting citation which we were creatively going. Hence, have been we perplexing to contend we incited nowhere? Or have been we ! merely i gnorant about a points upon a compass?
As we said, there have been 360 points upon a compass, from a single to 360 degrees. Then we have a 0.5 points. Hence there would be 720 points if a 0.5 degrees were taken in to consideration. But given do we usually verbalise in terms of about-turns (U-turns), which should essentially be a 180-degree spin as well as not a 360-degree turn? What about a 90-degree spin (which equates to we right away conduct east) or a 270-degree spin (which equates to we right away conduct west)? Then there have been north-east, north-west, south-east, south-west, north-north-east, north-north-west, south-south-east, south-south-west, as well as many, many some-more directions upon a compass, 720 directions in all if a 0.5 points have been included.
Can we right away see, 'sword of samurai', how your thoughts works? Either we have been with me or we have been my enemy. Either we go to sky or we go to hell. Either we follow a loyal sacrament or we follow a false religion. Either we go north (360 degrees) or we go south (180 degrees). You possibly select black or we select white (no grey, yellow, red, green, blue, etc.).
It is a thoughts of a chairman who can usually understand a single or a other. It is not a precocious thoughts which can equate aloft than two. Everything comes in twos. It is possibly male or female. Man of woman. There is no probability which someone can be neither male nor lady though something in-between. Hence all those 'something-in-betweens' need to be ostracised as well as treated with colour similar to pariahs.
Okay, let's pierce on. First review a headlines report below:
PKR Indera Makhota MP Azan Ismail reveals which there was an try to entice him as well as alternative PKR MPs in 2010.
A PKR personality claimed currently which there was an try in 2010 to buy over multiform PKR MPs by a "respected figure" who "used to hold a high hire in governme! nt". Ind era Makhota MP Azan Ismail told a press discussion which he was offering some-more than RM5 million during a assembly in a five-star road house in Kuala Lumpur upon Jan twenty-seven which year. But he pronounced he had sufficient firmness to reject a offer. Azan refused to divulge some-more details about a chairman as well as a meeting.
It is right away 2012. More than 3 years ago, behind in early 2009, when we was still in Malaysia, we suggested which there was a plan to buy over Pakatan Rakyatwakil rakyat(Members of Parliament as well as State Assemblypersons). That was when a Umno State Assemblyman, Nasarudin Hashim, crossed over to Pakatan Rakyat. Then, reduction than a week later, dual PKR State Assemblymen, Jamaluddin Mat Radzi as well as Mohd Osman Jailu, crossed over to Umno, as did Nasarudin Hashim. This was followed by DAP's Hee Yit Foong reduction than a week after that. And which was a finish of a Pakatan Rakyat Perak state government.
The thing is, we had already warned Anwar Ibrahim progressing which this was starting to happen. we additionally told Anwar, as well as we wrote about it as well, which Umno is selling for many some-more Pakatan Rakyatwakil rakyatand sums of RM5 million to RM25 million is being offered. we suggested which Hee was offering RM25 million as well as we additionally suggested who was paying her, Vincent Tan. In spite of this early warning, zero was done as well as it still happened anyway.
we spoke out opposite this as well as even told Nizar Jamaluddin to oppose a Sultan of Perak if necessary. This call to challenge a Sultan of Perak incurred a exasperation of a Sultan of Selangor who summoned my uncles as well as aunty to a palace to be informed of this displeasure. My aunty afterwards sent me an e-mail to discuss it me which a family wants me to apologize to a Sultan or else a family was starting to insert an advertisement in a mainstream newspapers to have well known which they have been distancing! themsel ves from me, which tantamount to my family disowning me.
we wrote about this as well as even published a e-mail from my aunty. My response, which we additionally published, was to banish myself from Selangor as well as gangling a need for my family to reject me or for a Sultan to banish me from Selangor, which Sultans can do as well as have been well known to have done.
This all happened in Jan as well as February of 2009. Now we have a PAS MP for Shah Alam, Khalid Samad, as well as a PKR MP, Azan Ismail, coming out to exhibit which behind in 2010 Umno attempted to buy off PKRwakil rakyat. And a figure of RM5 million any chairman is mentioned, a same figure we mentioned behind in Jan 2009, prolonged prior to it happened as well as whilst Perak was still under Pakatan Rakyat.
Who is a a single who done this offer? Who have been all a PKRwakil rakyatthat they attempted to buy off? They exclude to discuss it us. It is still a secret. This was ostensible to have happened in early 2010. It is right away mid-2012. Why did they keep this a tip for some-more than dual years? Is it given all these people wanted to keep their options open in box they still needed to accept a suggest of RM5 million to jump? Or is it given RM5 million is as well low an offer? Since Hee was paid RM25 million afterwards given suggest them usually RM5 million? Why not they as well be offering RM25 million, usually similar to Hee? So is it they did not wish to exhibit a suggest of RM5 million given they were perplexing to come to terms for a aloft price, contend RM25 million usually similar to Hee?
we was told Umno is no longer meddlesome in shopping these people. Why spend RM5 million or RM10 million or RM25 million in shopping PKRwakil rakyatwhen a subsequent ubiquitous choosing is about to be called? If a ubiquitous choosing is called in Sep afterwards there is usually 3 months to go. Is not RM25 million per conduct as well many for usually 3 months? B! etter Um no usually wait for until a subsequent ubiquitous election. Chances have been Umno is starting to be swept behind in to power. And even if Umno wins with a reduction than two-thirds infancy they can always have another suggest after a subsequent GE. And it is not sure yet who have been a possibilities who will be contesting as well as whether they have been starting to win or not.
Anwar is aware of these people who Umno attempted to buy off. But all these people kept quiet. Hence they might be forsaken as possibilities in a subsequent ubiquitous election. So right away they come out, some-more than dual years later as well as 3 months prior to a subsequent ubiquitous election, as well as declare which Umno attempted to buy them off. They afterwards declare which they refused to accept a suggest given they have been people of principles who cannot be bought. So there is no excuse to dump them now. They should still be selected as claimant for a subsequent ubiquitous election.
Why did all these people not immediately, upon a same day behind in 2009 or 2010 when Umno initial approached them to have a offer, come out to declare which Umno attempted to buy them off? Why keep assembly Umno a couple of some-more times to come to terms a aloft price as well as usually now, when Umno is no longer meddlesome in shopping them off, come out to exhibit what happened so prolonged ago? And given exclude to exhibit a entire list of PKR people who were given offers? And given not exhibit details of when, where as well as who? Why still so many secrets?
Do we cruise all these PKR people have been saints? Do we cruise which they have been right away starting in to 'confession mode' because, as they claim, they have been people of element who cannot be bought? Come on! These people refused a RM5 million offer, which is true, though they refused a RM5 million suggest given Hee was paid RM25 million. So given have been they being offering usually RM5 million? Why not RM25 million simi! lar to H ee? And right away which Umno is no longer meddlesome in shopping them off they go in to confession mode as well as fake which they have been people of principles who cannot be bought.
Back in 2008 we told Ronnie Liu which Badrul is a wrong claimant for Port Kelang. Ronnie usually shrugged his shoulders as well as told me which it is not his decision. That is PKR's preference given Badrul is a PKR claimant who is tighten to Anwar Ibrahim. Ronnie afterwards told me to assistance campaign for Badrul given he is a really diseased claimant as well as needs a lot of assistance to win. we did as well as Badrul won. Then, as we feared, Badul left as well as joined Umno. we kept still as well as campaigned for Badrul when we should instead have lifted ruin as well as demanded which he be forsaken as well as replaced with another candidate. Will screaming about it right away help? Can it change anything? Or should we have screamed about it behind in 2008 prior to a Mar ubiquitous election?
So, yes, as Rais Yatim said, we have altered my mode. we have altered from being a blind supporter of PKR to being someone who is vicious of PKR when critique is due. And critique is positively due when it comes to a little of a PKR people. But usually similar to we am not a blind supporter of religion, we am not additionally a blind supporter of PKR.
Do we know which Islam has never abolished slavery? Talk to anyulama'(scholar) as well as he or she will discuss it we which labour is legal in Islam. And if they discuss it we otherwise afterwards they have been fibbing by their teeth. But we am opposite to slavery, labour of any kind, even mercantile labour as well as labour of a mind. So we will verbalise out opposite labour even if Islam does not classify labour as illegal. Do we expect me to await labour usually given we happen to have been innate a Muslim? Am we not authorised my own views? Must we become a mental slave as well as blindly follow what we cruise as incorrigibl! e althou gh it might not be illegal?
Homosexuality is both bootleg as well as incorrigible from society's as well as religion's point of view. But we know my views upon happy rights. we have created about this subject many times as well as it is no tip which we apply oneself a rights of gays. But homosexuality is opposite a law as well as is cursed by religion. Should we therefore not additionally condemn gays as well as direct which they be put to death? What stand should we take? Do we follow what multitude as well as sacrament final or do we have a right to my own views? Did God really create usually dual species of humankind, male as well as woman, with zero in between? What about those innate with dual sex organs, male as well as female? Did not God additionally create these people? These people have been called hermaphrodites.
Opposition supporters similar to 'sword of samurai' usually see as well as take emanate of a critique we have done opposite Pakatan Rakyat. They conveniently forget as well as forget as well simply all a critique as well as exposes we have done as well as am still making opposite a government. This is called resourceful memory.
Pakatan Rakyat is banging away upon a Tan Kay Hock-George Kent issue. This is a latest 'hot issue' given a NFC make a difference has died down a bit. ButMalaysia Todayrevealed this many earlier, even prior to George Kent was awarded a project. And we already suggested even progressing a attribute between Tan Kay Hock as well as Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.
Where do we cruise Pakatan Rakyat got all their report from? And given wait for so late prior to jumping onto a bandwagon as well as have it appear similar to this is an disdainful Pakatan Rakyat expose? Even as new as 11 days agoMalaysia Todayhad already suggested this in an essay calledWell, Najib, what do we have to co! ntend ab out this?. Did anyone verbalise about it? Did Pakatan Rakyat take up a issue? Now they scream as well as hold press conferences as well as emanate media statements upon a make a difference that, months ago,Malaysia Todayhad already revealed. Then a little of we contend thatMalaysia Todayis not revealing a wrongdoings of those in government.
Then there was a RM2 billion Kidex issue. AG's links to Ho Hup as well as Vincent Lye. Saiful Bukhari Azlan's affectionate attribute with a single of a prosecutors in Anwar's Sodomy 2 trial. The assembly Saiful had with a military in a road house room in a Kuala Lumpur Concorde. The AG's sex liaison with a single of his Directors. The ex-IGP's links to a Chinese underworld syndicate. The RM8 billion MAS liaison as well as a couple to a RM30 billion Forex scandal. And much, many more. Did notMalaysia Todaybreak all these stories as well as isMalaysia Todaystill not we do so even as new as final week?
So, yes, amongst all those scandals thatMalaysia Todayexposed as well as is still we do so, we additionally display wrongdoings by a opposition. And when we do which we have turned, have been bought, have been right away working for Barisan Nasional, as well as whatnot.
Well, let me discuss it we this. You who cruise similar to this have been amongst a 30% doctrinaire Pakatan Rakyat supporters. To you, Anwar Ibrahim's fart smells sweet. To infer which we am a doctrinaire antithesis supporter we must siphon Anwar's dick as well as flicker over his arse. Then, upon a alternative side, we have a 30% Barisan Nasional doctrinaire supporters. Again, to these people, Najib's fart smells sweet. And to infer which we have been loyal Malays as well as supporters of Barisan Nasional we many siphon Najib's dick as well as flicker over his arse.
These dual groups have been a lost cause. Never thoughts what we contend as well as do, these dual groups will never budge or! see rea son. They have sealed their minds to all reasoning. My target is a 40% uncommitted, theatas pagaror fence sitters. This is a thinking group. And, many importantly, this is a group which is starting to be a kingmaker.
The subsequent choosing is starting to be a print finish. It is not clear cut possibly way. If it is afterwards Najib would have hold a elections final March, when a 'window' was still open. Now it is getting dicey for both sides. A 5% pitch possibly approach is starting to confirm a winner. So a 40% fence-sitting group is really consequential to this 5% swing.
Over a 30-day period,Malaysia Todayreceives 600,000-700,000 singular readers. In any article, during many 100 or 200 of we post comments. And a infancy of these comments abuse as well as swear during a government, abuse as well as swear during me, abuse as well as swear during a Malays, abuse as well as swear during Islam, as well as whatnot. That is all, 100-200 of you. And usually given a 100-200 of we sing a same cursing as well as swearing tune we cruise which his represents a infancy perspective of a 600,000-700,000 singular visitors.
Think again!
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment