Civil Litigation: Sabah phenomenon BUT are lawyers really that useful?


Civil Litigation: Sabah materialisation BUT have been lawyers really that useful?
Dear Sir,
Not a day goes by without a newspapers in Sabah carrying cinema of grinning lawyers station next to their Clients.
This is a fraud by lawyers who "lose" 90 per cent of their cases solely where they have been photographed grinning ear to ear outward a building with their Clients.
The purpose of a picture in a newspapers fraud a photographer/reporter endangered customarily gets at slightest RM 200 from a counsel endangered is to capture even more Clients.
The real story is that Clients who do not crop up in a newspapers with their lawyers constantly "lose" their cases.
This is since a counsel will do a understanding with a other side as well as do a number upon a Client who will eventually be sacrificed after being fleeced over many years.
The truth is stranger than a fiction.
Ninety per cent of polite lawsuit box do not go in to Court in many cases since a lawyers do a number upon Clients after taking income or for Trial.
Clients contingency not pour out to see a counsel a impulse that they have a polite lawsuit problem.
A counsel is a LAST person they need to see.
Don't be overawed by a process
It's improved for Clients to record their own cases in Court after drafting them with a help of someone who knows how to have submissions. Such help need not be a counsel though someone who knows how to breeze really good as well as can thus have out a constrained case.
Most lawyers hav! e really bad denunciation as well as drafting skills as well as rely upon verbal submissions or cranky hearing in Court. They can't even breeze a elementary minute in English or Malay.
Clients need a counsel only to crop up in Court after a Trial date is secured as well as to have verbal representations for an out-of-court allotment or to take a matter to Mediation Court or unwell both approaches, prepare for Trial. Here, lawyers have been needed for citations re a law as well as authorities.
Lawyers will in all claim that they have to do a lot of legal research though this is only bullshit to lay waste Clients. Legal research is available online at a touch of a button.
Lawyers have been not authorised to be benefaction in Mediation.
Contrary to renouned belief, Courts do not determine a direction of a polite lawsuit box or its result though they can help by way of Order for Directions.
Under a adversial complement in Court, a parties to a dispute determine a direction of a box as well as also determine a result by a demeanour in that they breeze as well as record submissions.
The Court merely draws a result of a box from a submissions of a parties in conflict.
Besides Mediation Court, lawyers have been not authorised to be benefaction at a various Tribunals that sometimes have been held at a courthouse. These include Land Office, Immigration, JPN, Customs, Income Tax, Labour, Industrial Relations, Housing, Consumer, Small Claims, Marriage, Arbitration (lawyers authorised with permission though not necessary) etc etc
Get reason of a copy of a High Court as well as subordinate court rules for reference as well as investigate them.
Thank you
Adichan Pudichan
- http://selvarajasomiah.wordpress.com/
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: