I refer to a BN government's polite fit for indemnification opposite Bersih Chairperson Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan as well as 9 others under section 6(2)(g) of a Peaceful Assembly Act 2012. The government's fit is politically motivated, legally invalid as well as implicitly wrong.
Section 6(2)(g) as well as a alternative provisions of a PAA 2012 do not emanate any polite right of action outset from any breach of a provisions of a Act. As such, a government's fit has no authorised basement whatsoever.
The vigilant of a PAA was to promote as well as govern a control of public assemblies. The PAA cannot be interpreted to levy onerous new statutory duties as well as polite liabilities on adults who select to practice a right to assemble.
The government's faith on a PAA to move polite actions opposite a rakyat is absurd, unconstitutional as well as undemocratic. The polite fit is additionally a critical injustice of supervision resources as well as supports by a BN.
Massive fraud
In Sep final year, a Prime Minister had voiced on a nationally televised eventuality which laws relating to public assemblies would be amended to give larger leisure to a rakyat.
Events since afterwards have proven which Najib's proclamation was a large rascal on a rakyat. The police violence during a Bersih 3.0 convene as well as a filing of a polite fit proves which Prime Minister Najib Razak never had any goal of permitting Malaysians to openly practice their right to peacefully assemble.
We call on Prime Minister Naji! b as wel l as his supervision to immediately withdraw a polite fit opposite Ambiga as well as her co-defendants.The supervision contingency additionally exhibit a border of a involvement of Najib as well as his cabinet in a preference to record this polite fit using public supports as well as resources.
N SURENDRAN IS VICE PRESIDENT OF PARTI KEADILAN RAKYAT
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment