You see, we might not be a lawyer, though we do know how a law works. Any statement by a third celebration which we repeat becomes scuttle-butt as well as as a result is not accessible in court. You cannot have an explain formed upon what someone told you. It contingency be formed upon what we yourself listened and/or saw. In this box we was NOT at a stage of a crime. Hence, by law, we cannot have any explain when we was not there as well as did not see or hear what happened.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Sorry to cut your swank balloon. we do recall which we once spoken Rosmah was there when Altantuya was C4ed. That was a distortion as well as we prepared yourself sometime later. Nevertheless, it was a distortion in a first place. So, we don't ALWAYS discuss it a law afterwards as we claim. --Fer
*******************************
That was a comment by 'Fer' posted in my article'Allow me to swank today'.
As we can see, from a hundreds of issues which we have lifted given a mid-1990s as well as a countless allegations we have done opposite politicians, police officers, polite servants, etc., there is only which a single emanate they keep raising, again as well as again, opposite me.
Do we meant to say, 'Fer', given a seventeen or 18 years which we have been writing political commentaries, this is a a single as well as only 'lie' which we am supposed to have done which we can have use of opposite me?
Never mind. Let's afterwards speak about this a single 'lie' which we have raised. It is essentially good which we have lifted it since it gives me an op! portunit y to speak about it. Or else what excuse do we have in raising this matter? In this instance, we am not raising this matter. You have lifted it, not me. we am only responding to a explain which we had lied. And if we do not respond afterwards we will contend which a explain is true.
Now, review my Statutory Declaration below. That is a strange sealed copy of my Statutory Declaration lodged in a Kuala Lumpur High Court upon 18th Jun 2008. we certitude this is a emanate we have been articulate about, 'Fer'. Can we discuss it me which partial of which Statutory Declaration is my explain opposite Rosmah Mansor?
Unless your authority of a English denunciation is really bad, we can see which a explain is not opposite Rosmah. The explain is opposite 'an informer'. we did not declare, as we said, which Rosmah was there. Instead, we spoken which an stool pigeon stated which Rosmah was there.
You see, we might not be a lawyer, though we do know how a law works. Any statement by a third celebration which we repeat becomes scuttle-butt as well as as a result is not accessible in court. You cannot have an explain formed upon what someone told you. It contingency be formed upon what we yourself listened and/or saw. In this box we was NOT at a stage of a crime. Hence, by law, we cannot have any explain when we was not there as well as did not see or hear what happened.
Before we sealed this Statutory Declaration we did get suggest from my lawyers as well as we was told as to what we can as well as cannot say. And we cannot contend which Rosmah was there since we was not additionally there as well as as a result did not see this. But we can contend what we have been told by this third celebration or informer, which we did.
In fact, a law requires which we do this. If we do not, afterwards we will be guilty of a crime of self-denial report regarding to a crime -- as well as we can get sent to prison for that.
In short, we cannot as well a! s did no t have an explain opposite Rosmah. What we can do as well as which we did do is to contend which someone else had done this explain as well as which we know whom this chairman is. Making an explain as well as alleging which someone else had done an explain have been dual different things. And as much as we might not have studied law, we do know sufficient law to assimilate what is scuttle-butt as well as to avoid scuttle-butt in my Statutory Declaration.
Thus, a explain which we lied about Rosmah is itself a lie. In alternative words, we did not lie. You have been fibbing which we lied. That is a prolonged as well as short of it.
Now, let's speak about a second partial of your statement, 'Fer', where we pronounced we prepared myself later. we do not know where we got this impression from though we suspect it contingency have been from my TV3 talk some-more than a year ago.
In my TV3 interview, we was asked about this Statutory Declaration of 18th Jun 2008 where we had done an explain opposite Rosmah. we replied to which chairman interviewing me just like how we have responded above. we explained to TV3 which we DID NOT have any explain opposite Rosmah. we never did back in Jun 2008 as well as we am not we do so now.
we afterwards went in to detail regarding a story of how we came to pointer this Statutory Declaration. we additionally explained which at first we did not hold this explain since we found it very distant fetched. we additionally suspicion it unlikely which Rosmah would travel in to which jungle as well as climb those hills.
Then, we explained, we checked with both Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah as well as Anwar Ibrahim as well as both of them reliable which they have been aware of this story. They additionally personally know my stool pigeon as well as consider him a very reliable/credible chairman who has been a great help to a Opposition. In fact, he has been feeding a Opposition a lot of very profitable information, generally ! pre-Marc h 2008.
Based upon this 'endorsement' by both Ku Li as well as Anwar, we motionless to aspire to this have a difference as well as pointer a Statutory Declaration. Nevertheless, we done certain which we did NOT have any explain opposite Rosmah, which will be hearsay, though instead alleged which my stool pigeon was a a single who pronounced this.
This was just what we pronounced in my TV3 interview. What we pronounced in Jun 2008 has not changed. My story still stands without any amendments, retractions, additions or subtractions.
Hence, 'Fer', in what way did we 'lie' in Jun 2008 as well as in what way did we 'correct myself later'? Can we see which it is you, instead, who is lying, 'Fer'? Or is it which your authority of English is so bad?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment