Seeing Red Over Independent Panel

The government's guarantee to set up an eccentric row to investigate a bashing of a open by a military as good as vice versa has been made known.

They kept to their guarantee of forming a row as good as noone pronounced about impartial members or conflict of interest as good as so on. Most expected their understanding or meaning of eccentric is as long as a members have been not related to any alternative by contention or blood, it's great enough to BN as being 'independent status'

So it's eccentric by trait of non blood or profession. BN didn't contend about their views, perspective or one's neutrality upon a Bersih emanate right?

So, what do you make of an ex IGP who b! randed t he marchers as carrying communist elements between them being comparison to Head a panel? Nothing startling really. You see, it only confirms a kind of doublespeak of 1Maklaysia as good as his BN government.

All those talk or guarantee about being open, but fear or foster as good as shift doesn't seem to uncover in a appointment of a conduct of a panel. Even a reply of this ex IGP to calls for his withdrawal because of his disposition remarks of a Bersih marches, simulate a kind of disease of a leaders as good as ex leaders who have headed supervision institutions.

When calls by him to withdraw, a ex IGP as good as his red communist tract he painted upon Bersih 3.0 tries so hard to hammer a point that he is impartial as good as eccentric minded. And not startling he displays a trait of how a supervision reply to disastrous greeting from a! public. "They can contend whatever they like. you mean what is critical is what you have been as good as how you proceed things," he was reported to have replied.

Seeing red between yellow!

So it does verbalise out loud how a supervision as good as ex supervision fellows still behave when queried about stand in customary as good as disposition action in enforcing a law, they will hang to their tall ground as good as omit a voices from a public. Were you not told they were a servants as good as you a masters? Well a electorate buy in to that statesman distortion always. Goes to uncover either electorate have been morons or they have been so genuine as good as diseased willed as good as dependent upon a politicians to get about their lives!

The 'let them consider what they like' perspective is additionally seen in a case of a Election Commission's Head who is or is he still an UMNO member? Even if you have been an dead member, by trait of your association with a domestic party, you can't, upon reliable drift as good as even dignified argument, be heading an choosing elect can you?! Oh, forget this is BolehLand where incredible feats of probity as good as radiant poise have been displayed by a BN supervision daily. The Pakatan fellows further additionally right away as good as then perform identical feats!

Do you unequivocally hold this fellow's rejection of vouchsafing a membership contaminate his judgement, work as good as decision in EC? If you accept that one's affiliation will not contaminate one's judgement, no consternation you have so many ex cons as good as benefaction conmen in a corridors of power as good as even conduct of many coercion agencies right?

Even in sports supposedly where satisfactory play is pronounced to be practised, judges from a home group will unequivocally be disposition as good as uncover favourtism towards a home group right? Like in a gymnastic event, a home judge will give a! higher measure to his or her own nation contestant right? But they explain it shows patriotism!

So as good if you have been a member of a domestic party you'd be shabby whether you identical to it or not. Like even those enforcing a law who have been supposed to be neutral have been carrying stand in standards in low coercion that you have been good as good familiar with! The latest in a mamak burger as good as funeral event (see later blog to come)

So if you accuse BN of being disposition in selecting a member who has shown his disposition perspective towards a Bersih fellows, can you additionally use a same argument if members of a Bar Council or Suhakam have been comparison too? The supervision as good as their supporters have been additionally screaming disposition as good as stand in customary towards these dual groups in their report of a post Bersih 3.0 incident. So, who is unequivocally 'independent' during a finish of a day if any of us who tries to give a satisfactory assessment of both sides of an emanate is being indicted of being bias?

It would be a noble thing to do for a alternative members to resign if they hold in a concept of what eccentric is right? But everyone has his/her own prejudice, disposition as good as favoritism attitude.

So if you hold in a ex IGP about his impartiality, appointing hims is akin to appointing a ex senator Tunku Aziz as conduct or a member of a eccentric cabinet as good as you should have full certainty forthrightness as good as integrity will rule a day eh?!

Even if both will contend it's their personal view as good as they have been entitled to it, any side will have respective 'bias' arguments upon a result of a findings.

However a ex IGP wants to explain his forthrightness or adopt a 'I couldn't caring less perspective as you am right as good as they have been wrong', Bersih supporters have been seeing red over his appointment as good as his ! uncalled -for labelling of a pacific marches as 'red commies'! - YAHMEH!!!

Read More @ Source

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz