As usually we feel contemptible for a single aged male wakakaka, we feel contemptible for this male too. Both humour from a same problem, which of seeking a 'meaningful' purpose in life wakakaka.
The latter portrays himself ardently as a Malay, creation statements like'kita orang Melayu'to emphasize which competition he considers himself as belonging to, constitutionally of course, because when it comes to genes he's asCinapekas a aged male wakakaka.
The Malay pronoun'kita'implies his articles were meant for Malays as well as not non-Malays [not which a aged male knows anything about this finer point of Bahasa, wakakaka].
In a kindest language a single can describe him as an ultra regressive yet either ultra regressive Malay nationalist or ultra regressive Muslim, we leave which to you to decide as your guess will be probably as great as mine.
There is humongous irony in his attempt to excoriate theDong Zong's final as 'insolent'for what he claimed as the'ultra kiasu'Dong Zong carrying no goal to confederate as well as to push for a national agenda, focussing usually upon 'Chinese, Chinese, Chinese'.
Firstly, it should be noted he has shown a sold welfare for a Singapore term'ultra kiasu'which he had formerly indifferent for columnist ! (and now blogger) Helen Ang. Maybe now which my dear Helen is rabidly anti DAP as well as in sold anti Lim GE (just as we am portrayed as rabidly anti Anwar Ibrahim wakakaka) they have done up.
I'll lapse to a term'ultra kiasu'at a end of this post.
Secondly, it's a bit abounding for Dr Tee to accuse Dong Zong of carrying no goal to confederate when his own unchanging pronouncements as well as articles have been rarely divisive, laying transparent sheer lines of demarcation betweenDong Zong's final as 'insolent'wakakaka.
Thirdly,when he condemned Dong Zong for focusing usually upon 'Chinese, Chinese, Chinese',wasn'the pointing to himself given his unchanging sign to his readers (Malays usually of course) of'kita orang Melayu'.
At least Dong Zong has not sheltered itself other than being an NGO for Chinese vernacular education. What does Dr Tee design Dong Zong to promote? Swahili?
And articulate about 'disguises', what about Dr Tee? What is he promoting?
However, we have to concur he hasn't blushed, pale or blenched when heaudaciouslypresented himself as a Melayu. Most positively he has a constitutional rights to do so, though there have been times we wonder about a conscience of his genes when he done so much importance upon his authorised racial status, a racial metempsychosis done probable usually by fiat of a Malaysian Constitution.
Admiral Zheng He
Yes, we wonder usually because a 22 million Chinese Muslims in China haven't, for 1400 years, rejected their informative heritage, from luminaries such as a famed Admiral Zheng He as well as Ming dynasty generals Chang Yuchun, Lan Yu, Ding Dexing, Mu Ying, Feng Sheng as well as Hu Dahaito a redoubtable Ma family of Hsing we (Xinyi) armed forces art fame.
And as a pointer to informative roots, we am sensitive which a mosque is calledqngzhn s() in Chinese, meaning'pure law temple'.
Xian Mosque
Only Dr Tee himself can insist because he prefers to be known as a Melayu, as well as what part this would play in a purpose he seeks.
I wonder because he doesn't dump a 'Tee' altogether as well as reinstate it with Tawfiq, which means 'good fortune' or 'to be successful'.
Huaisheng Mosque
Perhaps which will encounter a needs of his purpose more appropriately. More importantly, as Ridhuan Tawfiq Abdullah, he afterwards doesn't need to remind his assembly of his racial standing via his'kita orang Melayu'. Maybe then, he need not be so'ultra kiasu'himself.
Niuejie Mosque in Beiing
POSTED BY KTEMOC
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment