While you determine with Netto that Anwar is positively a Pied Piper, my sense of a Pied Piper is not a chronicle Netto has in mind. My Pied Piper is a strange a single in Hamelin, whom a Germans call Rattenfnger von Hameln.
The strange story of Rattenfnger von Hameln was a single of horror, though a tale was subsequently converted in to a single that had rats as well as whatnot. In a strange tale, a Pied Piper hypnotized as well as led many many children to their deaths. No, you do not suspect Netto had this sense of Anwar in thoughts wakakaka.
Au contraire, whenever Terence writes, you can be sure of dual things: detached from requiring a dictionary, he'd be promoting Anwar Ibrahim.
Nothing wrong in a latter as you all promote someone you similar to (like kaytee does for Karpal Singh wakakaka) or conflict someone you be vexed (like kaytee does upon Anwar Ibrahim wakakaka).
But Terence Netto exceeded a bounds of rational idea in a on top of referred to Malaysiakini article. This was what he pronounced of Anwar:
You usually have to give him a pedestal as well as this preacher for democracy will use it to espouse a themes of leisure as well as equality with an ardor that is allied to a ferocity Dickens displayed in attacking their miss in English institutions of a 19th century
Evangelist for democracy?
Apart from a wrong preference of word in 'evangelist' (which! those r eligious hounds might exploit to Anwar's disadvantage) you have usually three words, all starting with 'P', to repor! t Netto' s acclamation of Anwar Ibrahim as a manuscript of democracy, namely:
Poppycock, inconceivable & pordah.
Evangelist for democracy? Wakakaka!
And dear Terence, what democratic message did your Anwar Ibrahim send to us when he attempted to seize supervision with his shameless 916 tomfoolery?
But Netto has been correct in describing Anwar as a Pied Piper since a single of those mathematically challenged 'children' in 916 wakakaka was (to my good sadness as a DAP supporter) DAP Hannah Yeoh, such was/is Anwar's hypnotizing obscurity of malarkey.
Then what about his welcoming a revolving-door frog, Nasarudin Hashim, ADUN for Bota in Perak to PKR. The Great One claimed a Nasaruddin's desertion "... reflected a sentiments of his voters, namely a Malays in his constituency ... as a commencement of a brand brand new wave."
Would Anwar Ibrahim afterwards allow that a desertion of erstwhile PKR Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi as well as Osman Jailu additionally "... reflected a sentiments of their voters, namely a Malays in their constituencies ... as a commencement of a brand brand new wave"?
Would a PKR anwaristas agree? Of march not, those foolish foolish Myrmidon would censure Najib for his immorality machinations, as well as you would determine to that, though of march when it's that preacher of democracy interesting frogs a other way, it's usually an additional step forward in man-man-lai democracy wakakaka.
Netto is no improved in that he even supposing an forgive for his preacher of democracy for withdrawing from a conference in New Delhi since Salman Rushdie, a writer of The Satanic Verse (and thus fatwa-ed to death by Iranian ayatollahs) was there.
An preacher of democracy? Wakakaka, you still can't hold Netto would report Anwar as a single after a 916 attempted ! subversi upon of a list box, as well as you haven't even enclosed a Great One's duplicity in a 1994 Sabah choosing frogology as well as ! a parlou s state of affair in his own party choosing process.
Maybe I'll supplement an additional 'P' to a 3 on top of (Poppycock, inconceivable & pordah) to report Netto's graduation of Anwar pukish.
Now, you come to a Great One's cowardice in refusing to experience with RPK in a WikiLeaks forum while in a same breath demanding Najib fronts up. The standard comments from those foolish foolish Myrmidons would be: 'Who's RPK to demand a discuss with Anwar', 'RPK is a nobody, so because should Anwar discuss with him' etc, ...
... as well as today Netto has come up with an additional essay to titillate Anwar in Malaysiakini's Anwar shouldn't discuss Najib by proxy, says PKR where he quoted PKR vice-president N Surendran accusing Najib of regulating RPK as a substitute to discuss Anwar.
I wish to make dual points really transparent to imbeciles [please exucse my irritability as I'm exasperated by perfect stupidity].
Firstly, it's not a debate. The subject is not, for example, 'Malaysia's mercantile future' or such likes that would afterwards be appropriate in a Najib-Anwar debate.
It's only a WikiLeaks forum where Julian Assange would talk participants. Surely, no a single is starting to argue that Julian Asaange will be debating with Anwar? So because is Anwar so shit frightened of RPK being present?
If a single doesn't have skeletons in his cupboard, a single wouldn't fright being in a forum with RPK?
Evangelist of democracy? Wakakaka, my toes are truly laughing.
Secondly, who in Malaysia has made WikiLeaks so straightforwardly available to news readers?
Anwar? Najib? Lim KS? Hadi Awan! g? Rais Yatim?
C'mon, do not be shy, you foolish foolish Myrmidons.
It has been RPK who publishes WikiLeaks articles regularly at Malaysia-Today.! It has additionally been RPK who publishes Malaysia's own chronicle of WikiLeaks, that when they unprotected UMNO's crime would be welcomed as well as praised by a same foolish foolish Myrmidons.
So, who in Malaysia is many competent as well as many deserving to be interviewed by Julian Assange?
The thing is Anwar is shit frightened of RPK!
Just review this to know a UMNO-in-waiting, as well as probably a little of a reasons because Anwar is a chicken.
And those foolish foolish Myrmidons, a little while finally admitting a Great One might not so good after all, wish us, beg with us, titillate us to opinion a less immorality twin, implying PKR.
But you know (not only guessing) PKR will be no better, as well as in a little cases even worse.
How can you be so cocksure? Because you recollect a single UMNO man who was in various ministerial positions for sixteen years, whom you hold as a many distressing Machiavellian person you had a exasperation of witnessing, as an example, his draconian proselytizing educational policy, as well as isn't that precisely a proof of a pudding in a eating? Not really Dickensian you know wakakaka ...
... though for fright of RPK, man-man-lai has chickened out to turn mai-mai-lai, wakakaka. Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment