What if a outcome upon Monday is: "Anwar Ibrahim not guilty"? You can call this sad thinking by Anwar's sympathisers. Some will say stop dreaming.From a Palace of Justice as well as halls of Putrajaya there will be echoes: "We told we so, a law is independent."
Can we imagine a editorials following a 'not guilty' verdict? A opposite song will be sung as well as a commentators will have a margin day starting upon an additional spin which a government as well as a law have regularly been fair.
A 'not guilty' outcome might additionally shift a whole political landscape as Anwar might cease to be seen as a martyr. The magnetism cause might vanish.
Could it hurt Pakatan Rakyat or BN? Will BN be means to recover mislaid ground after multiform recent corruption claims which implicate a government as well as cabinet? Eventually, it's how a voters perceive it.
All Malaysians hope which a satisfactory as well as pure law will make known a outcome which will make Malaysia unapproachable of a independent judiciary.
If it's a 'not guilty' verdict, it might come with conditions. According to a lawyer, Anwar might embrace a conditional liberate not amounting to an acquittal. He might be set free, but a box might be reopened if any further justification is unclosed by! a pro secution.
"The semen," he quipped, "may be found in an additional anus somewhere, as well as there is no revelation how prolonged a brand new box will draw towards on."
Meanwhile, a prosecution's interest might see a box starting for an additional long-drawn battle.
Will sanity prevail?
Of course, a enlightened outcome will see a former deputy budding minister's counterclaim team jumping for happiness - having toiled over a box for roughly two years.
They will take honour which their submissions formed upon painstaking research have resulted in an exculpation for Anwar, despite all a prosecution's contentions in court.
During a case, Anwar as well as counterclaim warn had reiterated which a justice routine had not been fair. But Anwar, at a same time, is hopeful which "sanity will prevail" as well as a decider would base his findings upon facts as well as law.
One might stop which Anwar had screamed from a dock which "the justice is unfair". The counterclaim had argued which there were cogent, constrained as well as flawless justification to support a argument which Anwar did not dedicate sodomy.
In mid-December, a counterclaim additionally described accuser Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan (far left) as a "puppet" in th! e plot. It was claimed Saiful had inserted a cosmetic object in to his anus to make it seem like he had been sodomised.Anwar's warn Sankara Nair pronounced given a devise to self-injure did not work, a charge later constructed a KY Gel as a process to insist why Saiful suffered no injuries to his anus.
He submitted which a prosecution's earlier allegation which Dr Mohamad Osman Abdul Hami! d had ad ded a word "plastic" later was "ludicrous as well as defied logic".
"Notwithstanding all a so-called 'evidence', there is no concrete justification as presented by a counterclaim which a crime ever took place," pronounced an additional lawyer.
Critical factor
The outcome might additionally be a vicious cause in garnering votes for both Pakatan as well as BN in a forthcoming ubiquitous election.
Allegations which a outcome will be a fixed preference will additionally hold no H2O if Anwar is found 'not guilty'.
"Rumours which a entire proceedings were directed at showing which they were blatantly unfair, will not be true anymore if Anwar wins this case," pronounced a law lecturer.
It contingency not be lost which Anwar's imprisonment after a first sodomy hearing helped springboard a antithesis alliance which later roughly caused a tipping point for a antithesis in a ! Mar 20 08 ubiquitous election.Opposition leaders believe which his conviction as well as imprisonment would strengthen Pakatan's chances of gaining a improved foothold in a subsequent ubiquitous election.
Given all a pros as well as cons of a Sodomy II trial, all rests with a verdict.
On Mar 8, 2011, High Court decider Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah (left) acted in all integrity by rejecting a DNA taken from equipment used by Anwar in a police cell, saying which it had been wrongly obtained.
His preference postulated Anwar a singular as well as ephemeral feat in a lengthy trial.
On Monday, a outcome - 'guilty' or 'not guilty' - will rest squarely in a mind of Zabidin, who would weigh a box sensibly with a! ll a pro s as well as cons presented during a trial. -M Krishnamoorthy
source:malaysiakini
cheers.
Posted byali allah ditta
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment