The "Malay World" is essentially really small. Regardless of Article 153, UMNO can Malay this, as good as Malay that, as good as yet, we find it both comical as good as unhappy which they have been claiming a "Superiority" of a house which is essentially quick diminishing.
Everyday we listen to of someone screaming as good as shouting about Article 153. Article 153 seems to be a Bane-of-Malaysian-Unity, a Bondage-of-UMNO, as good as a Brunt-of-Kopitiam-Discussions.
Somehow, dress like, verbalise like, rehearse customs like, as good as is Muslim defines a race. Race, race, race, race. That's all Malaysians have been bombarded with all day long. Has Malaysia no "udder" better topics to verbalise about? Chinese-Indian-Malay this, Chinese-Indian-Malay that. This will be a final time we will plead this. And once as good as for all put to rest all this foolish cloak-and-dagger discussions.
Before we begin, as good as this is lerned during Pakatan Rakyat - STOP screaming about Tax-Payers' Money. 90% of Malaysians do NOT care! Why? Because usually 10% of a Malaysian Population pays Tax. And those who do NOT compensate Tax, do NOT care! The infancy of Malaysian Government's income comes from Oil Money. And to stop UMNO, we have to stop their source of income. This Oil income is circa 45% of Malaysia's Wealth. Capisce?
And since do we move Oil in to a formula? Simple! The Majority of oil comes from Borneo. And in Borneo, there have been usually 11% Malays in Sabah. And once we deduct a commission of Melanaus in Sarawak, we have been left with about 3% Malays in Sarawak.
Number one:
Melanaus have been Melanaus. Malays have been Malays. Ibans have been Ibans. And we will never listen to any a single verbalise about a Teochew race. Since when is a Chinese Muslim a Malay? And since when is! a Keral a-boy a Malay?
Number two:
Konvensyen Dunia Melayu proudly proclaims which a "Malay-World" has a race which includes Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Philippines, Brunei, Singapore, Indonesia, Burma as good as Vietnam. Sounds dandy. But to a average person, this is confusing. It seems to suggest which all of Thailand, which has a race of circa 60 million is Malay. However, for which to happen, thenKonvensyen Dunia Melayu needs to accept which we MUST additionally accept a definition of a Buddhist Malay in Indochine, Hindu Malay in Bali, as good as Abangan Malay in Jowo, as good as a Catholic Malay in a Philippines!! Clearly, these countries have been as Austronesian (Malay) as a samples found in Malaysia, though they have been really not Muslim.
Konvensyen Dunia Melayu needs to trim their numbers down by utterly a bit then. Let's begin with a little of a Major-slashings. (You do a math yourself.) Approximately 80% of all Javanese have been of a Abangan Religion, as good as Jowo has a race of about 120 Million. Bali is 93% Hindu, Philippines is 87% Catholic, as good as reduction than 2% of Thais have been Muslim.
Konvensyen Dunia Melayu proudly proclaims which a "Malay-World" has a race which includes Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Philippines, Brunei, Singapore, Indonesia, Burma as good as Vietnam. Sounds dandy. But to a average person, this is confusing. It seems to suggest which all of Thailand, which has a race of circa 60 million is Malay. However, for which to happen, thenKonvensyen Dunia Melayu needs to accept which we MUST additionally accept a definition of a Buddhist Malay in Indochine, Hindu Malay in Bali, as good as Abangan Malay in Jowo, as good as a Catholic Malay in a Philippines!! Clearly, these countries have been as Austronesian (Malay) as a samples found in Malaysia, though they have been really not Muslim.
Konvensyen Dunia Melayu needs to trim their numbers down by utterly a bit then. Let's begin with a little of a Major-slashings. (You do a math yourself.) Approximately 80% of all Javanese have been of a Abangan Religion, as good as Jowo has a race of about 120 Million. Bali is 93% Hindu, Philippines is 87% Catholic, as good as reduction than 2% of Thais have been Muslim.
And what about Malaysia then?
According to a ultimate Census, notwithstanding all a body-snatching, conversions of Chinese, as good as Indians for Business Purposes, acclimatisation of Chinese as good as Indians for Marriage Purposes, plus a deeply encouraged importation of Indonesian Muslims, Project IC of thePhilippinoMuslims, Southern Thai Muslims, Bangala Muslims, India's Muslims, Pakistan's Muslims, heck, even Serbia's as good as Palestinian Muslims as good as a insistence which "Malays" wanting to multiply 16.3 children per woman, it is perhaps SHOCKING to reveal which thecensusof Malaysia in a year 2011 proudly announces that:
According to a ultimate Census, notwithstanding all a body-snatching, conversions of Chinese, as good as Indians for Business Purposes, acclimatisation of Chinese as good as Indians for Marriage Purposes, plus a deeply encouraged importation of Indonesian Muslims, Project IC of thePhilippinoMuslims, Southern Thai Muslims, Bangala Muslims, India's Muslims, Pakistan's Muslims, heck, even Serbia's as good as Palestinian Muslims as good as a insistence which "Malays" wanting to multiply 16.3 children per woman, it is perhaps SHOCKING to reveal which thecensusof Malaysia in a year 2011 proudly announces that:
"Malays have been (now finally) a largest racial organisation in a country, comprising50.1 per centof a 27,! 484,596 total"
Taken from Here:http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/census-population-hits-27.5m-mark/
Taken from Here:http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/census-population-hits-27.5m-mark/
Wait a minute!?! ONLY 50.1 PERCENT? Yes. It reads correctly. What happened to a 68% Malay-Muslim a Main-Stream-Media had always advertised, as good as insisted which we believe?? You meant now, as good as usually right away there have been 50.1% Malays in Malaysia? Was there a dump in Islamic popularity? An 18% dump is a serious concern, by everybody involved. Regardless, let's assume which a 50.1% is not faked in any approach ....
What if we deducted all a Chinese Muslims, all a Indian Muslims, as good as all a "dan lain-lain Muslims", what commission would we finish up with? 30%? Less? (Yea, yea, we all know guys similar to Abdullah Tee, Mahathir, as good as his koncho-koncho have been called "Malay" since of Article 153.) What if we additionally deducted all a Malays who have beensuccessfullyproselytized? Yea, all those closet Hindu Malays, as good as Buddhist Malays, Catholic & Christian Malays, Jewish Malays, Hare Krishna Malays, Bahai Malays, Mahakari MalaysZoroastrianMalays as good as Atheist Malays .... What numbers afterwards would we have? 20%? Less?
What was it ten years ago? What was it 30 years ago, as good as what was it half a century ago?
Who is a Malay?
A 1974 request released to a United Nations by a Government of Malaysia, rebuilt byDOROTHY Z. FERNANDEZ, AMOS H. HAWLEY, SILVIA PREDAZA,defines "Malay" as:
"...Malay: Malay, Indonesian, Negrito, Jakun, Semai, Semdai,Temiar, Other Orang Asli as good as Other Malay(s)..."
"...Malay: Malay, Indonesian, Negrito, Jakun, Semai, Semdai,Temiar, Other Orang Asli as good as Other Malay(s)..."
Hold upon a second ... A Negrito, Jakun, Semai, Semdai,Temiar, Other Orang Asli have been Muslim? What happened to Article 15! 3?
Also, since is every Indonesian upon Malaysian soil deliberate a "Malay"? There is additionally no discuss of a word Bumiputra in which Document during all. Mind we which this was rebuilt in 1974, as good as Article 153 was already roughly twenty years old!! What is interesting to note is a sold paragraph which reads similar to this, as good as we quote verbatim:
"...There was additionally an immigration of Malays from a adjacent islands,particularly from Java as good as Sumatra, to work upon a rubber estates. It is not possibleto trace their numbers by a early years. Attempts were made to identify"Malays as good as Other Natives of a Archipelego" in a enumerations of 1891 and1911, though a palliate of assimilation of Malay migrants from Indonesia made a countsvery unreliable..."
What afterwards is all this nonsense about "Malays" NOT being "pendatangs" as good as all?"...There was additionally an immigration of Malays from a adjacent islands,particularly from Java as good as Sumatra, to work upon a rubber estates. It is not possibleto trace their numbers by a early years. Attempts were made to identify"Malays as good as Other Natives of a Archipelego" in a enumerations of 1891 and1911, though a palliate of assimilation of Malay migrants from Indonesia made a countsvery unreliable..."
Read again a above. It obviously as good as plainly states "immigration of Malays fromneighboringIslands, particularly Java as good as Sumatra..."
If this sentence does not define "Pendatang Malay", afterwards we do not know what does!!! we contingency remind we which this is in truth a Malaysian Government Official Document, rebuilt for a United Nations. What is poignant in this document, is which upon page 16, it gives a breakdown of a races. Including all a (in their own words) "Pendatangs".
The "Malay" Population in Malaysia totaled3,125,474, a Chinese 2,333,756, as good as a Indians696,186. It is strange which there was no "dan lain-lain" category. As if they did not exist during all. The sum race in this table is drafted at6,278.758. And thus, we can ascertain which if we added3,125,474 (Malay) to2,333,756(Chinese) and696,186(Indian), as good as subtracted this number from a grand sum of6,278.758, we would have a numbers for a "dan lain-lain" category, which amounts to 123,342. However,! when a single divides3,125,474 (including Indonesians, Orang Asli's, Sabahans, as good as Sarawakians etc etc) by a sum race of6,278.758, afterwards we would hit an startling figure of 49.778539%.
The "Malay" Population in Malaysia totaled3,125,474, a Chinese 2,333,756, as good as a Indians696,186. It is strange which there was no "dan lain-lain" category. As if they did not exist during all. The sum race in this table is drafted at6,278.758. And thus, we can ascertain which if we added3,125,474 (Malay) to2,333,756(Chinese) and696,186(Indian), as good as subtracted this number from a grand sum of6,278.758, we would have a numbers for a "dan lain-lain" category, which amounts to 123,342. However,! when a single divides3,125,474 (including Indonesians, Orang Asli's, Sabahans, as good as Sarawakians etc etc) by a sum race of6,278.758, afterwards we would hit an startling figure of 49.778539%.
Hold upon a notation now. You meant which notwithstanding all those inclusions of "Pendatang Indonesians" as good as Sabahans, as good as Sarawakians (they have been classified as a "other Malays") as good as usually about everybody else, a sum "Malay" race in 1974, in commission terms was only49.778539% ? Anyone else can see a number-manipulationswhich has been going upon right away right under your noses?
The full request in PDF form can be downloaded here:http://www.cicred.org/Eng/Publications/pdf/c-c34.pdf
(Yes, it was typed with a typewriter. Clickety-clack, smudges as good as all)
(Yes, it was typed with a typewriter. Clickety-clack, smudges as good as all)
Number Three:
DNA, according to ProfZilfalil Alwi,defines "Malay" as an accretion of multiple races with 52% coming from Chinese DNA, as good as a rest, from Indians, amongst others. The long as good as short of it, a tenure which many Malaysians endear, "Chindian".Another theory presented by Professor Zilfalil was which early Malays could additionally be Indian priests who came to a Malay peninsula to spread Hinduism. Sejarah Melayu fortifies this when it available which a first Kings of Malaya were in truth of a Keling stock, which we wrote about here, titled "Parameswara is a certified Singaporean Keling - Not a Joke"
You can review a full square here:http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/letterssurat/43394-parameswara-is-a-certified-singaporean-keling-not-a-joke
DNA, according to ProfZilfalil Alwi,defines "Malay" as an accretion of multiple races with 52% coming from Chinese DNA, as good as a rest, from Indians, amongst others. The long as good as short of it, a tenure which many Malaysians endear, "Chindian".Another theory presented by Professor Zilfalil was which early Malays could additionally be Indian priests who came to a Malay peninsula to spread Hinduism. Sejarah Melayu fortifies this when it available which a first Kings of Malaya were in truth of a Keling stock, which we wrote about here, titled "Parameswara is a certified Singaporean Keling - Not a Joke"
You can review a full square here:http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/letterssurat/43394-parameswara-is-a-certified-singaporean-keling-not-a-joke
You can review about a Malay DNA square here:http://www.asiaone.com/print/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Malaysia/Story/A1Story20111026-307064.html
On December 23rd 2011, upon USM's own website, they presented this again
Read it yourself from a horse's own mouth here:http://www.usm.my/index.php/about-usm/news-archive/66-news-highlight/5956-DNA-MAPPING-PROVE-ASIANS-HAVE-SAME-GENETIC-ANCESTRY-.html
Read it yourself from a horse's own mouth here:http://www.usm.my/index.php/about-usm/news-archive/66-news-highlight/5956-DNA-MAPPING-PROVE-ASIANS-HAVE-SAME-GENETIC-ANCESTRY-.html
we will call your courtesy however, to a single ofProfZilfalil Alwi's ownstatements, as good as which is"...From his presentation, a 'Indianisation' of a Malay peninsula was described in early Chinese accounts, where there was a Hindu kingdom...", as good as a usually thing which we wish to stress, is which they have been called "Chinese Records" since a Chinese were already in Geographical Malaya. And being a Hindu positively does NOT make a single an Indian!! Race as good as Religion do NOT correlate. Country borders as good as sacrament does have a correlation though, as good as which is something else to think about.
Number Four:
Why is it which once a Chinese or an Indian converts to Islam, they have to shift their name(s) to an Arabic one, as good as inadvertently put Abdullah as your father's name?
Perhaps Malay Muslims have never heard or come across Hui Liangyu (China vice premier) as good as Sania Mirza (tennis player). Their names never resembled anything Arabic though they have been well-known Muslims. This includes Yvonne Redley (a reporter once incarcerated by Taliban), Nicolas Anelka as g! ood as F rank Ribery (both footballers) have been still proud to be called by their original name notwithstanding theirconversionto Islam. It is important to note which nothing lift a "bin Abdullah" suffix.
Many turn Muslims when they wish to marry a Muslim whilst others modify to Islam as a means of tapping in to a amicable as good as economic benefits which Muslims enjoy. This is positively an glorious approach to foster one's religion.Why is it which once a Chinese or an Indian converts to Islam, they have to shift their name(s) to an Arabic one, as good as inadvertently put Abdullah as your father's name?
Perhaps Malay Muslims have never heard or come across Hui Liangyu (China vice premier) as good as Sania Mirza (tennis player). Their names never resembled anything Arabic though they have been well-known Muslims. This includes Yvonne Redley (a reporter once incarcerated by Taliban), Nicolas Anelka as g! ood as F rank Ribery (both footballers) have been still proud to be called by their original name notwithstanding theirconversionto Islam. It is important to note which nothing lift a "bin Abdullah" suffix.
Number Five:
The Baju Melayu is NOT Muslim clothing. Neither is a Songkok. we guarantee we which neither a Prophet Muhammad, nor any of his 10,000 Soldiers wore a Baju Melayu. Unless of course, someone from UMNO tells we which ProphetMuhammadwas a Malay!! The Songkok obviously comes from a Bataks of Medan, who in turn were possibly inspired or (more likely) copied it from Nehru in India. The Kopiah, upon a other hand, is as Jewish as it is Islamic. (Google "Religious Skullcap" yourself.) The Jewish word for it is"kippah". For those who do not know, the French government banned a wearing ofkippot,hijabsand largecrossesin open first as good as delegate schools in France in March 2004. Contrary to what we were told, a French were NOT usually banning a Hijab. In fact, a single could proudly wear a baju Melayu in France as good as no a single gives a hoot, since it is NOT Muslim clothing, as good as is not recognised as so.
The Baju Melayu is NOT Muslim clothing. Neither is a Songkok. we guarantee we which neither a Prophet Muhammad, nor any of his 10,000 Soldiers wore a Baju Melayu. Unless of course, someone from UMNO tells we which ProphetMuhammadwas a Malay!! The Songkok obviously comes from a Bataks of Medan, who in turn were possibly inspired or (more likely) copied it from Nehru in India. The Kopiah, upon a other hand, is as Jewish as it is Islamic. (Google "Religious Skullcap" yourself.) The Jewish word for it is"kippah". For those who do not know, the French government banned a wearing ofkippot,hijabsand largecrossesin open first as good as delegate schools in France in March 2004. Contrary to what we were told, a French were NOT usually banning a Hijab. In fact, a single could proudly wear a baju Melayu in France as good as no a single gives a hoot, since it is NOT Muslim clothing, as good as is not recognised as so.
Number Six:
The 20-point agreement as good as a (now erased) 18-point agreement between a Federation as good as Borneo can be review here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20-point_agreement
How many of these have been violated? Anyone been to Kuching would note which a street-signs have been all in English (most of them anyway.).
The 20-point agreement as good as a (now erased) 18-point agreement between a Federation as good as Borneo can be review here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20-point_agreement
How many of these have been violated? Anyone been to Kuching would note which a street-signs have been all in English (most of them anyway.).
we wish to indicate your courtesy to:
Point 12: Special in front of of inland races!
"In element a inland races of North Borneo should suffer special rights analogous to those enjoyed by Malays in Malaya, "
This in hint means which there is absolutely no need for acclimatisation to any sacrament other than their own to suffer a same sum of Article 153. Failure to comply with this substantially allows for both Sabah as good as Sarawak to "un-join" themselves similar to what happened to Singapore.
Although, this remains theprerogativeof a destiny "Republic of Borneo" adults to decide. That is a loyal trademark of Democracy. Decision by a people, as good as not decision by a Dictators, as good as this is perhaps a bestexplanationof what ishappeningaround a world. Regime after Regime is collapsing a single by one. Perhaps a UN would acquire a "Republic of Borneo" as a 197th nation after Sudan (North as good as South?) Borneo positively has a resources to do so, as good as if they exercised "skill procurement" similar to Singapore, they can continue to "brain-drain" a peninsular of her tip Academics, as good as lerned professionals. The Oil wells will positively lift her by a year 2030, generally with Rigs similar to "Kiki" being a single of a tip producers beating a total wealth of all of Miri's oil rigs (but that's an additional story).
I'm additionally flattering sure which Pakatan Rakyat would assist we in gaining thisindependence, as their assurances of integrity to all, based upon their Championing of Human RIghts, Voice-of-the-People Battle-Cry as good as so upon would be happy to grant we this, if we collaborated with them prior to a coming 13th General Elections. After all, it's a win-win situation. Pakatan gets to defeat UMNO, as good as a "Republic of Borneo" is born. What a illusory photo-finish!! No longer will Penans have to be raped, no longer will Taib be robbing Sarawak, as good as Bruno Manser's physique might finally be found after all these years. For West Malaysians, it creat! es no di sproportion to we during all. Most of we have never been there anyway, as good as even if we did today, we still need to uncover possibly your Passport (before) or uncover your MyKad (aka IC).
"In element a inland races of North Borneo should suffer special rights analogous to those enjoyed by Malays in Malaya, "
This in hint means which there is absolutely no need for acclimatisation to any sacrament other than their own to suffer a same sum of Article 153. Failure to comply with this substantially allows for both Sabah as good as Sarawak to "un-join" themselves similar to what happened to Singapore.
Although, this remains theprerogativeof a destiny "Republic of Borneo" adults to decide. That is a loyal trademark of Democracy. Decision by a people, as good as not decision by a Dictators, as good as this is perhaps a bestexplanationof what ishappeningaround a world. Regime after Regime is collapsing a single by one. Perhaps a UN would acquire a "Republic of Borneo" as a 197th nation after Sudan (North as good as South?) Borneo positively has a resources to do so, as good as if they exercised "skill procurement" similar to Singapore, they can continue to "brain-drain" a peninsular of her tip Academics, as good as lerned professionals. The Oil wells will positively lift her by a year 2030, generally with Rigs similar to "Kiki" being a single of a tip producers beating a total wealth of all of Miri's oil rigs (but that's an additional story).
I'm additionally flattering sure which Pakatan Rakyat would assist we in gaining thisindependence, as their assurances of integrity to all, based upon their Championing of Human RIghts, Voice-of-the-People Battle-Cry as good as so upon would be happy to grant we this, if we collaborated with them prior to a coming 13th General Elections. After all, it's a win-win situation. Pakatan gets to defeat UMNO, as good as a "Republic of Borneo" is born. What a illusory photo-finish!! No longer will Penans have to be raped, no longer will Taib be robbing Sarawak, as good as Bruno Manser's physique might finally be found after all these years. For West Malaysians, it creat! es no di sproportion to we during all. Most of we have never been there anyway, as good as even if we did today, we still need to uncover possibly your Passport (before) or uncover your MyKad (aka IC).
So, in addressing Abraham-son-of-Ali's matter about Article 153 as good as a church, as good as it's relevance to May 13th, what is a relationship? Are we telling everybody which Perkasa would launch an additional May 13th if "dan lain-lains" begin to debate Article 153?
As shown above, a Borneo people have been denied their Bornean Article 12Rights. Are we fortifying a Bornean Article 12 as well? Was Article 153 created byProphetMuhammad? Is Article 153 called a Hadith? The Koran? Is this synthetic request so "Holy" which it cannot be changed?
we know for a actuality a Malaysian Constipation has already been altered roughly 600 times since 1957. With a "most poignant change" pertaining to a de-clawing of a Sultans. Proselytizing of Muslims? You wish evidence? Sure, I'll give we evidence. Just review here:(A kid with internet access would have found these easily):http://www.strategicnetwork.org/index.php?loc=kb&view=v&id=2557&fto=633&and here:http://www.partnersintl.org/partners/se/mymw
As shown above, a Borneo people have been denied their Bornean Article 12Rights. Are we fortifying a Bornean Article 12 as well? Was Article 153 created byProphetMuhammad? Is Article 153 called a Hadith? The Koran? Is this synthetic request so "Holy" which it cannot be changed?
we know for a actuality a Malaysian Constipation has already been altered roughly 600 times since 1957. With a "most poignant change" pertaining to a de-clawing of a Sultans. Proselytizing of Muslims? You wish evidence? Sure, I'll give we evidence. Just review here:(A kid with internet access would have found these easily):http://www.strategicnetwork.org/index.php?loc=kb&view=v&id=2557&fto=633&and here:http://www.partnersintl.org/partners/se/mymw
Go ahead. The evidence is clear. Arrest them! Hang them, stone them, or decapitate them. Show a universe which Malaysia is in truth NOT a moderate Muslim nation which she pretends to be!! And all since of a few over-zealous individuals who pretend to be "Holier-than-Thou" whilst digging their hands in to a wealth of a country, as good as robbing it blind!
What happened to Article eleven of a Federal Constipation? DidAbraham-son-of-Ali erase it? Did he additionally erase Sarawak's 18-point agreement? It's positively contained inside of a same Constipation which he screams as good as rants about (wh! ile sayi ng 3 times upon Al Jazeera as well). So where does which leave us?
The truth of a matter is, a "Malay World" is essentially really small. Regardless of Article 153, UMNO can Malay this, as good as Malay that, as good as yet, we find it both comical as good as unhappy which they have been claiming a "Superiority" of a house which is essentially quick diminishing. Javanese have been right away called Melayu, Bugis have been right away called Melayu, Acehnese have been right away called Melayu, Minangs have been called Melayu as good as even Southern Thais, as good as SouthernPhilippinosare called Melayu. What just is so important about being a Melayu which warrants a attack upon a Nons?
Prophet Muhammad was positively NOT a Malay, as good as hence, a "Ketuanan Melayu" is pristine bollocks. Who have been we trying to impress? Article 153 is man-made, man-written, as good as man-changeable. Who knows if we continue to let UMNO Dictate a destiny of Malaysia, a single day, UMNO might declare which Allah is a Malay??
Read More @ Source Prophet Muhammad was positively NOT a Malay, as good as hence, a "Ketuanan Melayu" is pristine bollocks. Who have been we trying to impress? Article 153 is man-made, man-written, as good as man-changeable. Who knows if we continue to let UMNO Dictate a destiny of Malaysia, a single day, UMNO might declare which Allah is a Malay??
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment