If the NFC scandal, the blatant thieving of Malaysia's open funds, could get any worse, it did with the entrance of the whiny, loud presence of Ibrahim Ali, the soon-to-be ex-MP for Pasir Mas.
Ibrahim Ali, nicknamed 'Frog' for his party-hopping ways, along with twelve 'NGOs', was since the lecture by Salleh Ismail, the obviously less-than-intelligent Chairman of the NFC as well as father of Women's apportion Shahrizat Jalil.
After the briefing, Ibrahim Ali called the press conference as well as dropped the bombshell which the Auditor-General had agreed which the NFC was not, after all, in the 'mess'. No, the AG had not finished so publicly though in the in isolation assembly with..Salleh Ismail, according to..Salleh Ismail! Based on this highly questionable square of information, Ibrahim Ali now demands which the AG publicly says which the NFC is not in the mess.
Obviously the indicted would have his chronicle of the 'truth'
It is not transparent because Ibrahim Ali chooses to believe Salleh Ismail, who, via the NFC scandal, has proven himself to be inept, dishonest, untruthful as well as peaceful to review to indeterminate equates to to try as well as squirm his approach out of his self-inflicted troubles.
Not confident with most threatening the Auditor-General, Ibrahim Ali discloses which the whistleblower is agasp!....non-Malay. And he accuses the whistleblower of absconding with NFC supports in an attempt to conflict his/her credibility.
Clearly, Salleh Ismail in his desperation, is anticipating to spin the NFC ema! nate in to the secular the single by enchanting the indeterminate services of Ibrahim Ali. It will not work; thievery of open supports is the crime no make the difference who does it. As an aside, the whistleblower would be inside of his rights to sue Ibrahim Ali in court. Let us goal Ibrahim Ali doesn't break down sobbing as well as great as he did when he was arrested under the ISA.
11 key Questions
No make the difference what tricks or artifices Salleh Ismail continues to come up with, he will be hard put to explain during slightest the following :
1. Why was 600,000 spent in 'entertainment expenses' when the NFC was the seller's market. It was the shortage of beef which was the logic for the setting up of the NFC. Should the buyers meddlesome in securing their supply lines not be profitable for the pronounced 'entertainments'?
2. Who were the people being 'entertained'? Please recover all the names of those who were entertained, for what amount, where as well as what they ate as well as drank. If the entertainments consisted of activities, what were they?
3. Why would open monies be used to buy illiquid assets similar to condominiums in Malaysia as well as Singapore (to our knowledge) when the income would be required in the on-going NFC project? If Salleh Ismail wanted to deposit additional funds, should it not have been in FDs, bonds as well as repos where he could fast collect his funds?
4. How is it which the NFC had additional supports to deposit in overpriced real-estate? Should the Agricultural Ministry as well as the Treasury not have released the supports in tranches whilst delicately monitoring the use?
5. Were there no restrictive covenants in the agreement between the NFC as well as the Agriculture Ministry?
6. Why were the 20-something young kids of Salleh Ismail paid tens of thousands of ringgit to, apparently, do nothing? If they did perform some function, what was it? ! Was whic h duty worth the income of the C-level executive in the in isolation company? Was this simply the approach to transfer income from the open coffers in to the wide-open purses of the Shahrizat family?
7. Why are there dual versions of when the agreement was signed? When was it signed, if during all? Please recover it!
8. What was Sharizat's impasse in procuring this deal for Salleh Ismail, her husband? Did she during any point plead it with Muhyiddin? Did she plead it with Khairy Jamaluddin, who so curiously rushed to defend her when the emanate first surfaced? Did she plead it with any alternative central or government, during any time or in any way? Was she kept aware of the status of this project, by any individual, together with her husband? If she denies all this as well as any alternative involvement, is she peaceful to contention to the lie-detector test? Is she peaceful to be cross-examined by the lawyer?
9. Why did Shahrizat review to hysterical political play as well as theatrics during the Wanita Umno assembly if she was, in fact, innocent?
10. Was Shahrizat not aware what her young kids were being paid exorbitant sums from NFC money? Did she not view this as theft of open monies? What did she do about it?
11. Does Shahrizat think it is acceptable to buy land as well as properties unrelated to the project during hand when entrusted with the open project? Did she inform this misuse to anybody? If she did not, she is an accomplice, as well as contingency stop personification the innocent.
Criminal probe imperative
There is, of course, supposedly an audit going on during the NFC right now. We do not instruct to speculate on the results. But it is transparent which as the first step, each cent which went to the pockets of the Shahrizat family was open income misspent, as well as contingency be returned to the state.
And afterwards contingency come the convincing cr! iminal p robe, in to all the players in this sordid NFC scandal.
Malaysia Chronicle
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment