A allotment has been reached today in a insult fit over a Tabung Budi programme brought by Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (Syabas) opposite Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim.
High Court judge Amelia Tee Hong Geok Abdullah available a conditions of allotment by a parties in chambers.
Counsel Firdaus Husni, who represented Abdul Khalid, told reporters which a parties had reached an agreement to solve a matter.
"The plaintiff (Syabas) withdrew a action. Today, a parties achieved an agreement to solve a movement (suit)," she said.
Counsel S Ravindran, who acted for Syabas, pronounced there was contention in between a parties over a allotment upon Monday when a fit was listened before Justice Amelia.
"The fit no longer continues, a matter is resolved," he said. However, he declined to reveal a conditions of settlement, saying it was confidential.
Another counsel, Cheng Chang Chai, pronounced a plaintiff's four witnesses had testified during a trial, which proposed upon Nov 24, while a suspect had nonetheless to start its case.
Syabas filed a fit opposite Abdul Khalid in Jan this year, claiming which he had uttered insulting difference opposite a company at a press discussion upon Nov 22, last year, regarding its Tabung Budi programme.
In its matter of claim, Syabas pronounced a insulting difference were published in an article titled 'Withdraw Syabas Licence - Khalid', which was published by Bernama upon a same day, as well as Harian Metro upon Nov 23.
Syabas pronounced which Abdul Khalid's matter could be accepted to meant which Syabas had deceived a open with its Tabung Budi programme. The water concessionaire was seeking damages, cost, as well as alternative r! elief de emed fit by a court.
Abdul Khalid in his matter of defence, countered which Syabas had no locus standi to file a insult fit as it performed a open function, as well as which he was not responsible for a pronounced press reports which were published by third parties.
- Bernama
Read More @ Source High Court judge Amelia Tee Hong Geok Abdullah available a conditions of allotment by a parties in chambers.
Counsel Firdaus Husni, who represented Abdul Khalid, told reporters which a parties had reached an agreement to solve a matter.
"The plaintiff (Syabas) withdrew a action. Today, a parties achieved an agreement to solve a movement (suit)," she said.
Counsel S Ravindran, who acted for Syabas, pronounced there was contention in between a parties over a allotment upon Monday when a fit was listened before Justice Amelia.
"The fit no longer continues, a matter is resolved," he said. However, he declined to reveal a conditions of settlement, saying it was confidential.
Another counsel, Cheng Chang Chai, pronounced a plaintiff's four witnesses had testified during a trial, which proposed upon Nov 24, while a suspect had nonetheless to start its case.
Syabas filed a fit opposite Abdul Khalid in Jan this year, claiming which he had uttered insulting difference opposite a company at a press discussion upon Nov 22, last year, regarding its Tabung Budi programme.
In its matter of claim, Syabas pronounced a insulting difference were published in an article titled 'Withdraw Syabas Licence - Khalid', which was published by Bernama upon a same day, as well as Harian Metro upon Nov 23.
Syabas pronounced which Abdul Khalid's matter could be accepted to meant which Syabas had deceived a open with its Tabung Budi programme. The water concessionaire was seeking damages, cost, as well as alternative r! elief de emed fit by a court.
Abdul Khalid in his matter of defence, countered which Syabas had no locus standi to file a insult fit as it performed a open function, as well as which he was not responsible for a pronounced press reports which were published by third parties.
- Bernama
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment