Extract fromThe Malaysia Insider (TMI)-Despite claims, Zaid says not rejoining PKR:
Datuk Zaid Ibrahim today denied rumours which he would be rejoining PKR, observant which allegations of discussions in between him as well as Nurul Izzah Anwar upon a matter were untrue.
The KITA boss was responding to a contents of a letter being circulated upon blogs, which purported he had met a PKR vice-president to plead his return to a Pakatan Rakyat leadership.
Before creation any comments, please reflect carefully upon what we wrote in January 2011, in a post titledThe Poison inside of PKR - Part IIIwakakaka (extracts follows):
In annoy of my hero Karpal Singh condemning Zaid, we have created in await of a latter see my previous postZaid Ibrahim - suffers no dope gladly.
When he was in PKR at a time leading to a celebration polls (before he tossed his hat in to a choosing ring) Zaid Ibrahim was cri! ticised for being erratic since one moment he said he would not challenge a emissary presidential postIF(initially) Nurul Izaah took up a challenge*, afterwards (subsequently)IFKhalid Ibrahim did so, as well as a subsequent (only when both Nurul as well as Khalid didn't) he took up a challenge.
* Azmin Ali went in to a panicky tizzy when Nurul casually referred to her interests, as well as 'advised' Nu! rul oppo site it since people would talk. Bet we Anwar had a couple of in isolation difference with Nurul
The customary anwaristas' cries opposite Zaid Ibrahim were his inconsistencies (in ancillary Nurul, afterwards Khalid, before to standing as a claimant himself), as well as their accusations unimaginatively attacked Zaid for his lust for power.
But we didn't see any craziness in Zaid's manoeuvrings. In fact there was a really unchanging design in his await for firstly, Nurul, as well as subsequently Khalid Ibrahim, before to he privately challenged Azmin Ali in a celebration election. That design was to prevent Azmin Ali from coasting home upon an Anwar-provided giveaway ticket in to a emissary boss post. He longed for Azmin Ali stopped!
Yes, Zaid was invincibly opposite Azmin Ali, a man for whom Anwar Ibrahim instructed Nallakaruppan to mount in reserve in a celebration VP competition a little years back, as well as which drove Nalla out of a celebration in angry frustration. Nalla would have simply won which VP position since of a strength of his Indian supporters in PKR.
Subsequently, Zaid quiescent from PKR for what he saw as unacceptable, unsalvageable as well as unforgiveable dodgy celebration polling to safeguard a choosing feat of a favoured son. And he wasn't a usually one to complain. In an additional of my January 2011 postsGobalakrishnan leaves a poison behindI wrote:
So a virtually unfit has happened - Gobalakrishnan, once PKR's arch bodek-er of Anwar, has quiescent from PKR in disgust. Who would have ever likely this before to a recent celebration polls - a poll which had led most celebration stalwarts as well as important as well as neutral socio-political observers to question a firmness of its process.
Silence from a celebration leaders, or their caught-with-pants-down incapacity t! o reply a hurdles by a complainants have invited a inevitable mortal implosion.
And instead of pressuring a celebration leaders to be fully accountable, predictably, a moronic PKR fanatics lambasted Gobala as a snake, frog, "Pakatan Rakyat"-MIC mole, using dog as well as with assorted animal appellations. Will they do likewise to alternative complainants similar to Chegubard, Jonson Chong, Mustaffa Kamil as they did to Zaid Ibrahim, Gobala, Nallakaruppan, etc?
Read alsoMalaysia-Today'sThe green grapes syndromewhere RPK wrote:
Whenever anyone resigns from PKR or Pakatan Rakyat, a antithesis supporters regularly say it is since these people have been ex-Umno or ex-Barisan Nasional people; so what do we expect? These ex-Umno or Ex-BN people have been not reliable or honest as well as in a destiny they betray a antithesis cause as well as go behind to their aged party, is a evidence we have been given.
Does this evidence apply to all ex-Umno or ex-BN people in a antithesis who have been yet to leave a antithesis to go behind to a statute party?
ex "Pakatan R! akyat" a nd ex BN people similar to Chua Jui Meng, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, Azmin Ali as well as wakakaka Anwar Ibrahim?
Anyway, Jonson Chong left only as did Zaid, Gobala as well as Nalla, as well as a horde of others. Mustaffa Kamil was given a high celebration post, an act of mollification which incidentally Chegubard resoundingly rejected.
Given this credentials of unmitigated dissatisfaction, antipathy as well as disgust with a EC-type celebration elections/management, signaling a utter hurtful rot in a party, do we think a man similar to Zaid Ibrahim, who could have sojourn inside of "Pakatan Rakyat" as a minister, would consider rejoining PKR?
TMIalso reported that:Online port! als as w ell as blogs including Malaysia Today have claimed a letter was created by Nurul Izzah's political enemieswithin PKRfollowing conjecture which she would turn PR's destiny claimant for budding minister.
For more, seeMalaysia-Today'sNurul Izzah nafi surat beracun.
I'm not in a least surprised at a attempted backstabbbing of Nurul, deliberation someone in PKR not long ago framed Chegubard (Badrul Hisham Shahrin) with a falsified twitter. Someone is sh*t frightened of Nurul becoming No 1. Oh, PKR is indeed a nest of vipers - a acorn hasn't far from a ash tree.
And only who would be Nurul's political enemieswithin PKR?
Just go through this post again as well as we should be means to find a answer.
Related:
(1)KITA - a e.g. of Zaid Ibrahim
(2)Zaid Ibrahim - suffers no dope gladly
(3)Anwar & Zaid Ibrahim's - chalk & cheese
(4)PKR celebration choosing - a horror stories continue
(5)Gobalakrishnan leaves a poison behind
Datuk Zaid Ibrahim today denied rumours which he would be rejoining PKR, observant which allegations of discussions in between him as well as Nurul Izzah Anwar upon a matter were untrue.
The KITA boss was responding to a contents of a letter being circulated upon blogs, which purported he had met a PKR vice-president to plead his return to a Pakatan Rakyat leadership.
Before creation any comments, please reflect carefully upon what we wrote in January 2011, in a post titledThe Poison inside of PKR - Part IIIwakakaka (extracts follows):
In annoy of my hero Karpal Singh condemning Zaid, we have created in await of a latter see my previous postZaid Ibrahim - suffers no dope gladly.
When he was in PKR at a time leading to a celebration polls (before he tossed his hat in to a choosing ring) Zaid Ibrahim was cri! ticised for being erratic since one moment he said he would not challenge a emissary presidential postIF(initially) Nurul Izaah took up a challenge*, afterwards (subsequently)IFKhalid Ibrahim did so, as well as a subsequent (only when both Nurul as well as Khalid didn't) he took up a challenge.
* Azmin Ali went in to a panicky tizzy when Nurul casually referred to her interests, as well as 'advised' Nu! rul oppo site it since people would talk. Bet we Anwar had a couple of in isolation difference with Nurul
The customary anwaristas' cries opposite Zaid Ibrahim were his inconsistencies (in ancillary Nurul, afterwards Khalid, before to standing as a claimant himself), as well as their accusations unimaginatively attacked Zaid for his lust for power.
But we didn't see any craziness in Zaid's manoeuvrings. In fact there was a really unchanging design in his await for firstly, Nurul, as well as subsequently Khalid Ibrahim, before to he privately challenged Azmin Ali in a celebration election. That design was to prevent Azmin Ali from coasting home upon an Anwar-provided giveaway ticket in to a emissary boss post. He longed for Azmin Ali stopped!
Yes, Zaid was invincibly opposite Azmin Ali, a man for whom Anwar Ibrahim instructed Nallakaruppan to mount in reserve in a celebration VP competition a little years back, as well as which drove Nalla out of a celebration in angry frustration. Nalla would have simply won which VP position since of a strength of his Indian supporters in PKR.
Subsequently, Zaid quiescent from PKR for what he saw as unacceptable, unsalvageable as well as unforgiveable dodgy celebration polling to safeguard a choosing feat of a favoured son. And he wasn't a usually one to complain. In an additional of my January 2011 postsGobalakrishnan leaves a poison behindI wrote:
So a virtually unfit has happened - Gobalakrishnan, once PKR's arch bodek-er of Anwar, has quiescent from PKR in disgust. Who would have ever likely this before to a recent celebration polls - a poll which had led most celebration stalwarts as well as important as well as neutral socio-political observers to question a firmness of its process.
Silence from a celebration leaders, or their caught-with-pants-down incapacity t! o reply a hurdles by a complainants have invited a inevitable mortal implosion.
And instead of pressuring a celebration leaders to be fully accountable, predictably, a moronic PKR fanatics lambasted Gobala as a snake, frog, "Pakatan Rakyat"-MIC mole, using dog as well as with assorted animal appellations. Will they do likewise to alternative complainants similar to Chegubard, Jonson Chong, Mustaffa Kamil as they did to Zaid Ibrahim, Gobala, Nallakaruppan, etc?
Read alsoMalaysia-Today'sThe green grapes syndromewhere RPK wrote:
Whenever anyone resigns from PKR or Pakatan Rakyat, a antithesis supporters regularly say it is since these people have been ex-Umno or ex-Barisan Nasional people; so what do we expect? These ex-Umno or Ex-BN people have been not reliable or honest as well as in a destiny they betray a antithesis cause as well as go behind to their aged party, is a evidence we have been given.
Does this evidence apply to all ex-Umno or ex-BN people in a antithesis who have been yet to leave a antithesis to go behind to a statute party?
ex "Pakatan R! akyat" a nd ex BN people similar to Chua Jui Meng, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, Azmin Ali as well as wakakaka Anwar Ibrahim?
Anyway, Jonson Chong left only as did Zaid, Gobala as well as Nalla, as well as a horde of others. Mustaffa Kamil was given a high celebration post, an act of mollification which incidentally Chegubard resoundingly rejected.
Given this credentials of unmitigated dissatisfaction, antipathy as well as disgust with a EC-type celebration elections/management, signaling a utter hurtful rot in a party, do we think a man similar to Zaid Ibrahim, who could have sojourn inside of "Pakatan Rakyat" as a minister, would consider rejoining PKR?
TMIalso reported that:Online port! als as w ell as blogs including Malaysia Today have claimed a letter was created by Nurul Izzah's political enemieswithin PKRfollowing conjecture which she would turn PR's destiny claimant for budding minister.
For more, seeMalaysia-Today'sNurul Izzah nafi surat beracun.
I'm not in a least surprised at a attempted backstabbbing of Nurul, deliberation someone in PKR not long ago framed Chegubard (Badrul Hisham Shahrin) with a falsified twitter. Someone is sh*t frightened of Nurul becoming No 1. Oh, PKR is indeed a nest of vipers - a acorn hasn't far from a ash tree.
And only who would be Nurul's political enemieswithin PKR?
Just go through this post again as well as we should be means to find a answer.
Related:
(1)KITA - a e.g. of Zaid Ibrahim
(2)Zaid Ibrahim - suffers no dope gladly
(3)Anwar & Zaid Ibrahim's - chalk & cheese
(4)PKR celebration choosing - a horror stories continue
(5)Gobalakrishnan leaves a poison behind
POSTED BY KTEMOC
Read More @ Source ADUN "Pakatan Rakyat" BERTUMBUK
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment