Datuk Zaid Ibrahim currently denied rumours which he would be rejoining PKR, saying which allegations of discussions in between him as well as Nurul Izzah Anwar upon the matter were untrue.
The KITA boss was responding to the contents of the minute being circulated upon blogs, which purported he had met the PKR vice-president to discuss his return to the Pakatan Rakyat leadership.
Before creation any comments, please reflect carefully upon what you wrote in Jan 2011, in the post titled The Poison inside of PKR - Part III wakakaka (extracts follows):
In spite of my favourite Karpal Singh condemning Zaid, you have created in support of the latter see my previous post Zaid Ibrahim - suffers no dope gladly.
When he was in PKR during the time leading to the celebration polls (before he tossed his hat in to the election ring) Zaid Ibrahim was criticised for being erratic since the single impulse he said he would not plea the emissary presidential post IF (initially) ! Nurul Iz aah took up the challenge*, then (subsequently) IF Khalid Ibrahim did so, as well as the next (only when both Nurul as well as Khalid didn't) he took up the challenge.
* Azmin Ali went in to the panicky tizzy when Nurul casually referred to her interests, as well as 'advised' Nurul opposite it since people would talk. Bet you Anwar had the few private difference with Nurul
The standard a! nwarista s' cries opposite Zaid Ibrahim were his inconsistencies (in supporting Nurul, then Khalid, prior to station as the candidate himself), as well as their accusations unimaginatively pounded Zaid for his lust for power.
But you didn't see any craziness in Zaid's manoeuvrings. In fact there was the really unchanging design in his support for firstly, Nurul, as well as subsequently Khalid Ibrahim, prior to he personally challenged Azmin Ali in the celebration election. That design was to prevent Azmin Ali from coasting home upon an Anwar-provided free sheet in to the emissary boss post. He wanted Azmin Ali stopped!
Yes, Zaid was invincibly opposite Azmin Ali, the male for whom Anwar Ibrahim instructed Nallakaruppan to mount in reserve in the celebration VP competition some years back, as well as which drove Nalla out of the celebration in angry frustration. Nalla would have simply won which VP position since of the strength of his Indian supporters in PKR.
Subsequently, Zaid quiescent from PKR for what he saw as unacceptable, unsalvageable as well as unforgiveable dodgy celebration polling to safeguard the election victory of the favoured son. And he wasn't the usually the single to complain. In an additional of my Jan 2011 posts Gobalakrishnan leaves the poison behind you wrote:
So the virtually unfit has happened - Gob! alakrish nan, once PKR's chief bodek-er of Anwar, has quiescent from PKR in disgust. Who would have ever likely this prior to the recent celebration polls - the check which had led most celebration stalwarts as well as notable as well as neutral socio-political observers to question the integrity of the process.
Silence from the celebration leaders, or their caught-with-pants-down inability to reply the hurdles by the complainants have invited the inevitable mortal implosion.
And ! instead of pressuring the celebration leaders to be entirely accountable, predictably, the moronic PKR fanatics lambasted Gobala as the snake, frog, UMNO-MIC mole, running dog as well as with various animal appellations. Will they do likewise to alternative complainants similar to Chegubard, Jonson Chong, Mustaffa Kamil as they did to Zaid Ibrahim, Gobala, Nallakaruppan, etc?
Read also Malaysia-Today's The sour grapes syndrome where RPK wrote:
Whenever anyone resigns from PKR or Pakatan Rakyat, the antithesis supporters always contend it is since these people have been ex-Umno or ex-Barisan Nasional people; so what do you expect? These ex-Umno or Ex-BN people have been not reliable or honest as well as eventually they misuse the antithesis cause as well as go behind to their old party, is the evidence you have been given.
Does this evidence request to all ex-Umno or ex-BN people in the antithesis who have been yet to leave the antithesis to go behind to the ruling party?
ex UMNO as well as ex BN people similar to Chua Jui Meng, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, Azmin Ali as well as wakakaka Anwar Ibrahim?
Anyway, Jonson Chong left just as did Zaid, Gobala as well as Nalla, as well as the host of others. Mustaffa Kamil was since the tall part! y post, an act of mollification which incidentally Chegubard resoundingly rejected.
Given this background of pure dissatisfaction, distaste as well as disgust with the EC-type celebration elections/management, signaling the utter hurtful debase in the party, do you think the male similar to Zaid Ibrahim, who could have sojourn inside of UMNO as the minister, would cruise rejoining PKR?
TMI also reported that: Online portals as well as blogs together with Malaysia Today have claimed the minute was created by! Nurul I zzah's domestic enemies within PKR following conjecture which she would turn PR's destiny candidate for budding minister.
For more, see Malaysia-Today's Nurul Izzah nafi surat beracun.
I'm not in the slightest astounded during the attempted backstabbbing of Nurul, considering someone in PKR not long ago framed Chegubard (Badrul Hisham Shahrin) with the falsified twitter. Someone is sh*t frightened of Nurul apropos No 1. Oh, PKR is indeed the nest of vipers - the acorn hasn't far from the oak tree.
And just who would be Nurul's domestic enemies within PKR?
Just go through this post again as well as you should be able to find the answer.
Related:
(1) KITA - the e.g. of Zaid Ibrahim
(2) Zaid Ibrahim - suffers no dope gladly
(3) Anwar & Zaid Ibrahim's - marker & cheese
(4) PKR celebration election - the abhorrence stories continue
(5) Gobalakrishnan leaves the poison behind
Read More @ Source
Ops Bilang* - 6. Anne James (pt 1 of 3)
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.c! om Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment