How to improve inter-ethnic and inter-religious relations

Almost without fail, everyday there is something upon TV, newspapers as good as blogs about inter-ethnic as good as inter-religious conflicts. From time to time, we also get to listen to about inter-regional frustrations (i.e. Sabahans as good as Sarawakians voicing their dissatisfaction over most things). UMNO accuses DAP of being anti-Malay, PAS says MCA is anti-Islam, Gerakan says PKR is anti-Chinese, PERKASA accuses a total universe of assorted things, HINDRAF says everybody is bullying a Indians, a cats accusing a dogs, a monyets accusing a porcupines, etc, etc, we get my point. Almost everything is turned in to secular or eremite issues. The volume of appetite squandered upon these have a disproportion is HUGE, a appetite which differently could be used to rise our nation.
You do not have to be a space station scientist to know which we all need to work towards mending inter-ethnic, inter-religious as good as inter-regional relations. When we contend we, we meant we. WE ALL. Not usually a government. Everyone. NGOs, individuals, private companies, political parties, EVERYONE.
It is a really formidable task.
We can make use of a 4-track approach to address a matter, namely :TRACK 1 : INCREASE CONTACTincrease communication in in between people from assorted racial as good as eremite groupsTRACK 2 : COMMON GOALprovide usual goals which people from assorted racial as good as eremite groups can pursue
TRACK 3 : REMOVE IRRITANTS
eliminate policies as good as practices which have been during vast viewed as unfair to certain groups
! TRACK 4 : PROVIDE SUPPORT
provide institutional await to inspire Tracks 1 to 3.
(excuse me : this is not a ground-breaking theory. It is mostly usual sense. we have just organized them in to 4 groups)
TRACK 1 : INCREASE CONTACT
We need to enlarge a volume of hit as good as volume of communication in in between assorted groups.
Increased communication or hit in in between disproportion groups of people produces familiarity which will in a future lead to acceptance. Increased hit fosters a certain attitude, await for integration, as good as reduces notice of hostility. The information which a single learns from inter-ethnic or inter-religious hit leads to some-more knowledge about as good as some-more correct perceptions of a alternative organisation (this is usual clarity la .)
This is since institutions which await solely for a single racial organisation or a single eremite organisation do not assistance in inhabitant integration. Vernacular as good as eremite schools have been great examples. Pupils in these schools have really singular hit with those outward their groups hence prejudice as good as a miss of high regard of a alternative groups. A Malay tyro from Gurun, Kedah who goes to a sekolah agama as good as then joins UiTM could potentially spend a initial twenty years of his or her hold up with roughly no hit people from alternative racial as good as eremite groups. Similarly, a Chinese tyro who attends Chinese initial as good as secondary school as good as lives in a Chinese brand new village would have really singular hit with non-Chinese people throughout his infirm ye! ars. The re are, of course, most alternative examples (e.g. in local universities, a Kelantanese roughly regularly hang inside of their own groups, they won't even brew with alternative Malays)
So we need to come up with programmes which will enlarge hit in in between a Malays as good as a Indians, a Ibans as good as a Chinese, a Punjabis as good as a Orang Asli, etc, etc. We need programmes which will enlarge hit in in between Buddhists as good as Muslims, in in between a Hindu as good as Christians, in in between a Jedis as good as a Siths, etc, etc. We need programmes which will enlarge hit in in between a Kelantanese as good as Johoreans, a Sabahans as good as Sarawakians with a folks in Peninsular Malaysia. And most importantly, we need to focus upon our youngsters before prejudice get deep-rooted in them.
There has been progress. With augmenting urbanization, there have been a lot some-more opportunities for assorted racial groups to interact. With cheaper airfares, there have been a lot some-more transport in in between Sabah, Sarawak as good as Peninsular Malaysia (as some-more Malaysians transport abroad, they as good will sense which not everybody is similar to them as good as will hopefully sense to appreciate people of alternative ethnicity as good as religion).
I am not going to discuss what as good as how these programmes would be. That's for an additional day.
Suffice to contend here which INCREASING INTERACTION in in between assorted groups is vital. And institutions which await solely for a single racial or eremite organisation have been not really helpful in fostering secular as good as eremite harmony.
TRACK 2 : COMMON GOAL
We need yield usual goals which people from assorted racial as good as eremite groups can aspire to together.When people have a usual purpose, they will work together as good as omit teenager irritations as good as problems. Sports is a great example. When we go to a stadium as good as cheer a Malaysian team, we usually will omit all a defects as good as idiosyncrasies of a fellow Malaysian supporters who lay subsequent to you. You could be a skinny tall Indian Muslim male from Tumpat, Kelantan as good as we would have no qualms entertaining together with a short fat Christian Kadazan girl from Kota Marudu, Sabah. She might even hug we when Malaysia scores a goal. Because we have a usual idea (i.e. a Malaysian victory), we automatically omit all a differences in in between we as good as your fellow supporters.So we need to settle usual goals. 1Malaysia is good as good as great however it is as good extended as good as nebulous which creates it formidable for male in a street to operationalize. We need to create projects as good as programme with specific goals as good as get assorted different groups to participate. For example, get a Selangor Buddhist Society as good as a Negeri Sembilan Muslims Association (if there have been such organizations) to experience in mangrove tree planting programme along a coast of Selangor as good as Negeri Sembilan with a idea of planting 10000 saplings in 2012 (this is just a hypothetical e.g. but we get my point).The COMMON GOAL track respect a initial track about INICREASING CONTACT. In a case of mangrove tree planting, there is an attendant enlarge in interactions in in between a Buddhists of Selangor as good as a Muslims from Negeri Sembilan.
I will discuss intensity "COMMON GOAL" programmes an additional day.

! To summarise, we have to move different groups together to work towards or await a usual goal. 1Malaysia is as good nebulous. It can be an over-arching prophesy but people need specific goals which they can easily understand.


TRACK 3 : REMOVE IRRITANTS
We need to eliminate policies as good as practices which have been during vast viewed as unfair or unpatriotic by certain groups.

We can move people together, have them verbalise together or work together. However if there is notice which complement seriously discriminates opposite a single organisation or another, a total thing will still not work. Throughout a world, in roughly all countries, there have been people who perceive which a little process or programme discriminates them. And they might be right. No have a disproportion how good a law, process or programme is implemented, a little people will feel discriminated against. We need to sense to live with this.

However, it is not as good formidable to brand obvious irritants i.e. policies as good as practices which have been unfair. Let me give we an example. Historically, developers have to give Bumiputras a 5% bonus for squeeze of houses. It is understandable since income levels of most Bumiputras were good next a others as good as most needed a additional help. we do not consider any one minds if we give discounts to a needy. But asking developers to yield a 5% bonus to allow a Bumiputra to buy a RM 1 million one-story dwelling is vast (mind you, this make use of is still prevalent).

The residence bonus upon top of is a system-irritant, i.e. an irritant with a formal or supervision policy. But there have been most irritants outward a system. For example, a vast majority of Malays find it really irritating which there have been most people who simply refuse to sense to verbalise Bahasa Malaysia. we find i! t irrita ting too. Hello this is not 1960's or 1970's. We have been articulate about today, some-more than 50 years after independence. It is done worse a culprits have been politicians thoughts we we have most politicians today whose spoken Malay is similar to a &%$ ##@ *&^%$ % as good as %$ #*@. Political parties could redress this really easily all a big boss has to do is to need aspiring candidates to undergo language classes.
There have been most irritants in a complement as good as most outward a system. we am not going list them all (otherwise we won't have anything to blog subsequent time).

Summary : We need to brand as good as discharge vital irritants, policies as good as practices which have been outrightly unfair or have been vital stumbling blocks to inhabitant unity.


TRACK 4 : PROVIDE SUPPORT
We need to provide institutional support.

All a upon top of 3 marks cannot occur by themselves (well, a little might but not during a vast scale). The supervision contingency yield await in conditions of incentives, funds, legislation, institutions as good as leadership to inspire inter-ethnic as good as inter-religious harmony.

For example, NGOs promoting such causes should be supported with supports or assistance in-kind by a supervision (for e.g. giveaway make use of of dewan serbaguna,swimming pool or even vehicles). Say NGO XYZ is organizing a tree planting programme for a organisation of Muslim as good as Christian children, a little supervision group should let them make use of their train for free.

The supervision could have available RM xxxx which assorted NGOs could bid for to run any programme which would contribute to 3 3 marks above. Of march proposals need to clearly conclude a outcomes in propinquity to mending peace as good as be measurable.
< br>Where necessary legislation as good as institution which might assistance in enhancing inter-ethnic as good as inter-religious harmony, these should be established.

Most importantly, inhabitant leaders need to fully embrace these concepts. Everything will destroy if leaders during a inhabitant turn blatantly use

The 4 marks contingency be executed in parallel. we imagine a little can be tricky (e.g. Track 3) but alternative tracts won't work effectively if there have been vital irritants in a system. We need to work upon all 4, commencement with a low unresolved fruits (there have been many. coming soon).

There will regularly be detractors (and in Malaysia there have been most frustrated as good as disgruntled people who will need vital persuasion). Napolean was quoted as saying "I won't strech my destination in time if we stop to chuck stones during every dog which barks during me". So, we need to begin somewhere as good as plod along until we grasp success.


There we go folks. 1 INCREASE CONTACT. 2 ESTABLISH COMMON GOALS. 3 REMOVE IRRITANTS. 4 PROVIDE SUPPORT. (actually we can make use of this frameowrk for mending peace inside of your own organization)

Yes, it is simpler said than done. But what is a cost of not doing anything ?

What do we consider ?




Read More @ Source

Bersih-bersih 1

July 11, 2010

Video Rating: 0 / 5

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: