NFC: Will Barisan Nasional Do It Right?

November 19, 2011

NFC: Will Barisan Nasional Do It Right?

by Kim Quek@www.malaysiakini.com

COMMENT: After roughly a single month of inexplicable silence, National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd (NFC), which is a aim of brick-bats as good as a center of a swirling controversy both inside as good as outside Parliament, finally pennyless a silence.

Mohamad Salleh Ismail (left), chairperson of NFC as good as husband of Women, Family as good as Community Development Minister Shahrizat Jalil, hold a press conference upon November 17 to defend NFC. He pronounced everything was dandy; a plan was right upon target, as good as there was no impropriety.

But a contribution given by him have been distant from convincing. In fact, they have been merely cover-ups for a botched job, in line with a series of stubborn denials modernized by BN leaders before him.

Before you go in to a main subject, let me hold upon dual side issues. FIRST: Salleh's press conference was an disdainful eventuality which certified six media which consisted of usually a Malay press as good as TV channels. All others, together with all a Chinese press, were barred from a press meet.

If NFC is frank about revelation a truth, because should it be fearful of journalists alternative than those from a BN-controlled media, which have been generally regarded as BN's propaganda instruments?

Isn't it viewable which a NFC has no confidence in fielding questions from reporters who have been not underneath a parsimonious control of a BN? Isn't it viewable which a BN longed for to ensure which what a open review is what a ruling bloc longed for them to read?

Cond o squeeze forgive unacceptable

SECOND: Salleh longed for us to hold which his squeeze of dual luxurious condominiums for RM14 million was a legitimate deployment of a supervision soft loan by revelation us which these condos fetch illusory returns.

NONEHe pronounced monthly rental for a single apartment house is RM70,000, which no a single seems to have believed. Credibility aside, who does Salleh consider he is which a open wouldn't mind lending his family a long tenure loan during 2 percent interest for them to consequence earnings (exorbitant or not) from real estate investment?

The forgive which it was usually a temporary investment for over-abundance money which could usually be utilised later for a plan is unacceptable, as NFC shouldn't have requested as good as a supervision shouldn't have granted a value of such vast volume of resting money from a Special Loan Account in a first place, a value from which were supposed to be underneath a despotic inspection as good as control of both a Finance Ministry as good as Agriculture Ministry.

Or, is a NFC revelation us which no projected money flow as good as projected distinction as good as detriment comment for a plan had been presented before to a supervision awarding this stipulate to it ?

That such injustice of supports has occurred indicates which a supervision has unsuccessful to guarantee open funds, or even worse, rapist dispute of interest (known as corruption) for awarding a stipulate to a associate though proper basis, if there was no proper plan paper deliberate sufficient to justify such an award.

Now, let us look during a contribution presented by Salleh to support his claim which this plan is you do well.

Project success is an illusion

Salleh pronounced this is usually a third year of a operati! on, as g ood as teething problems have been expected.Wrong. His own son, Wan Shahinur Izran, a afterwards CEO, pronounced during a signing ceremony for a RM250 million facilities upon Dec 6, 2007 which "operations have been scheduled to begin in Feb subsequent year". So, four years have over given then.

felda cow cattle rearing centre palong 120206 cow02Salleh pronounced his company had "raised" 8,016 conduct of cattle in 2010, "surpassing a aim of 8,000 conduct of cattle". Wrong. The criterion should be a series of cattle slaughtered, not "raised", as this is a beef supply project.

The series of cattle in a feedlot cannot be a magnitude of production, otherwise, vast numbers of freshly arrived animals from abroad could be counted as "production".

So, a Auditor-General was right in his inform which a 3,289 conduct of cattle slaughtered in 2010 constituted 41 percent of a scaled down aim of 8,000. The strange aim was 60,000 per year as announced by CEO Wan Shahinur Izran during a loan signing ceremony.

Salleh serve pronounced which "at a opening of operation in 2009, a NFC had nonetheless to find a marketplace while a abattoir was usually approved in April which year, halal certification dual months later as good as a Veterinary Health Mark, which was compulsory before meat could be sold, in 2010."

Salleh additionally added which a NFC needed to send a employees for precision to acquire specific skills to run a operation. These difference from Salleh seem to be those spoken by a beginner in this field who is appealing for understanding for his faltering performance. They stand in stark contrariety to a stirring debate by CEO Izran behind afterwards in 2007 when he said: "We intend to play an instrumental purpose to lead, make up as good as transform a attention to encounter 40% self-sufficiency".

Izran serve pronounced which a company's activitie! s will " include cattle feedlotting as good as fodder prolongation through stipulate as good as heavenly body farming, slaughtering, processing, marketing, as good as alternative upstream as good as downstream activities."

As for stipulate farming, NFC would "assist a comparison parties in removing financing, provide start-up as good as follow-up precision in prolongation as good as commercial operation administration department as good as supply feeder cattle, feed materials as good as veterinary services". In actuality all these activities have been additionally found in NFC's website as a range of activities.

Ineptitude given confirmed

It is apparent which there is a huge gap between rhetoric as good as realities in a NFC adventure. Salleh said, NFC usually started operation in 2009. But because not in 2008 given it was already granted a huge loan earlier? (Incidentally, was a company operating utterly upon a soft loan though poignant equity input from a shareholders? If so, this would be an additional anomaly which would pile upon a case of rapist impropriety in awarding a stipulate to a recipient.)

Salleh indicated which marketplace demand had been a constraint which caused a slow pick up even in 2010, though how could which be when a country has been importing 80% of a beef from overseas? Such censure usually reveals a lack of wherewithal to run a business.

As for a slow buying of capitulation for this as good as that, these have been lame excuses which simulate a ineptitude of a company to take upon a plan of this size.

The contribution before us point irresistibly to abuse of energy in a awarding of this project, as good as rapist loosening (of a government) as good as crack of trust (of a plan operator) in a injustice of open funds.

The correct thing to do is to nail a culprits, recover a account as good as appoint a competent entrepreneur to spearhead a project. Will a BN supervision do what is right, or will it be commercial! operati on as usual?


Read More @ Source

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: