The Make-Up of the Malaysian Judiciary: Who We Appoint to the Seat of Justice is a Matter of LIFE and DEATH for Malaysians

Quote

"....Who have been THESE JUDGES who swing such energy over us, a energy indifferent for GOD?

Who have been these MERE humans with a energy to wring young kids from their mothers as well as to reject group to genocide or enclosure them similar to beasts in penitentiaries?

Who possesses a energy to frame us of a professions, a possessions, a really lives?

THEY make law.

THEY might take divided your mother or your great name or your leisure or your happening or your life.

THEY have been omnipotent.


And a question is: To whom have you so weakly postulated which power?

Are THEY a kind who would understand YOU , who from their practice would know something of a fears as well as struggles you have faced?

Will THEY caring about YOU or about JUSTICE?"

- Gerry Spence,
American lawyer


Judicial Diversity Creates Confidence

by

Roger Tan

Read here for more

How does Malaysia fare with authorised diversity?

Is ours a some-more deputy bench?


Photobucket


The list shows a racial combination as well as gender of a judges in a higher courts.

As a list shows, there is a satisfactory series of women as well as non-Malay judges at a High C! ourt lev el, though not in a appellate courts.

In fact, given Merdeka, usually one white, two Chinese, one Indian as well as one womanwere appointed to head a High Court of Malaya.

They were, respectively,
  • Tun James Beveridge Thomson (1957-1963);
  • Tan Sri Ong Hock Thye (1968-1973) as well as Tan Sri Gunn Chit Tuan (1992-1994);
  • Tan Sri Sarwan Singh Gill (1974-1979); and
  • Tan Sri Siti Norma Yaakob (2004-2006).
  • JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION

    Further, a members of a Judicial Appointments Commission comprise:
  • six Malays,
  • one Chinese,
  • one Indian and
  • one easterly Malaysia bumiputra, and
  • only a single of a nine members is a woman.
  • To my mind, a incident could be due to a default of non-Malays in a Judicial as well as Legal Services, though overall women still outnumber group in this sector.

    SESSIONS COURT

    Currently, in apply oneself of Sessions Court judges, there are:
  • 119 Malays (56 have been women),
  • two Chinese (women),
  • five Indians (three have been women),
  • nine easterly Malaysia bumiputras (four have been women) and
  • one Others (a woman).

  • MAGISTRATES COURT


    For Magistrates, there are:
  • 139 Malays (84 have been women),
  • two Chinese (men),
  • one Indian (woman) and
  • four easterly Malaysia bumiputras (all men).
  • However, there have been substantially MORE non-Malays serving in a Attorney General's Chambers.

    But if other authorised officers such as deputy as well as partner registrars have been added, women would almost stand in men.

    This is not a new phenomenon as, in a final two years, women have doubled a series of group entering a authorised profession.Of course, non-Malay law graduates prefer to enter a authorised contention rsther than tha! n stick upon a Judicial as well as Legal Services with a view, either rightly or wrongly, which in isolation use is some-more lucrative.

    In fact, with a revised remuneration scheme, a current basic pay of a magistrate who is a fresh law connoisseur is RM1989.45 (with additional perks value about RM1,000 depending upon a place where a magistrate serves).

    This, of course, is far improved off than his prototype in progressing days, similar to in a early 1980s when a magistrate's basic pay was usually about RM1,050.

    In any event, if a reason for under-representation in a appellate law by NON-MALAYS is due to a miss of commendable possibilities in a Judicial as well as Legal Services, then resort should be had to a pool of commendable possibilities between senior members of a Bar usually similar to in a case of Jonathan Sumption, QC who recently done history by being a first lawyer to be towering directly to a Supreme Court of a United Kingdom.

    Having said that, let no a single inapplicable designation me as advocating a share system or positive discrimination upon a drift of gender, competition as well as religion in authorised appointments because which would go opposite Article 8(2) of a Federal Constitution.

    I am also mindful of a views expressed by a little women judges themselves, such as a former probity of a Supreme Court of Canada, Justice Claire L'Heureux-Dub. She argued which it was not enough to have simply some-more women or minorities upon a bench."What you need", as she was quoted by Australian judge, Justice McHugh, "is a shift in attitudes, not simply a shift in chromosomes."

    I disagree.

    If there exists a sum deficiency or a outrageous disproportionate presence of women as well as minorities at appellate courts, something contingency be wrong somewhere.

    It is my deliberate opinion which a Judicial Appointments Commission should regularly encourage a different law which is some-more deputy of a make-up! of a co untry.

    We ! contingency als o correct any perception which a judges, who have been a arbiters of civil laws, have been not satisfactory as well as independent especially when they adjudicate upon sensitive issues such as competition as well as religion.

    It follows which who you designate to a seat of probity is a make a difference of hold up as well as death.

    As a single of America's excellent trial lawyers, Gerry Spence, put it so trenchantly:

    "Who have been these judges who swing such energy over us, a energy indifferent for God?

    Who have been these mere humans with a energy to wring young kids from their mothers as well as to reject group to genocide or enclosure them similar to beasts in penitentiaries? Who possesses a energy to frame us of a professions, a possessions, a really lives?

    "They make law. They might take divided your mother or your great name or your leisure or your happening or your life. They have been omnipotent.

    And a question is: To whom have you so weakly postulated which power? Are they a kind who would understand you, who from their practice would know something of a fears as well as struggles you have faced? Will they caring about you or about justice?"

    It is, therefore, my honest perspective which authorised farrago as well as meritocracy should go palm in palm because a law which does not simulate a society's farrago will ultimately lose a confidence of which society.

    In other words, a strength of any law is essentially dependent upon open confidence even if seated upon a dais have been monolithic judges who have been ! most mer itorious.

    This is achievable if there is a political will, as well as a single usually need to demeanour at how successfully Presidents Bill Clinton as well as Barack Obama did in bringing farrago to a American judiciary.

    Posted by Malaysian Unplug

    ! Read More @ Source

    More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
    Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

    No comments: