In a run up to an anticipated snap GE, a budding apportion dangled formerly unimagined sweet promises.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUTRAJAYA: The budding apportion pronounced which his administration department department respects as good as understands a need for an eccentric judiciary.
"My administration department department is committed to an eccentric judiciary, which is an necessary part in nation-building," Datuk Seri Najib Razak pronounced in his speech during his maiden visit to a Palace of Justice (POJ), here yesterday, which houses a Federal Court as good as Court of Appeal.
http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/Najib_ISArepealedtomakeMalaysiabestdemocracy/Article/
Najib: ISA repealed to have Malaysia most appropriate democracy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, he got a really easy thing to do to infer how critical he is with regards to those lofty goals as good as put divided a spook of Perkasa torpedo! ing his previous flagship called NEM (not to discuss a tragic rubbish of tax payers' money succumbing to subcontractor of a little sorts to a domestic party)
Take a demeanour during this territory of Election Act, 1958.
Whoever drafted this square of misapplication is basically telling a law to f@#k off if a concerned tax payer notice something amiss with a electoral roll.
This is a square of legislation by a most appropriate democracy in a world, basically saying which basic democractic right of looking probity from courts is denied.
This is a square of legislation by a administration department department which apply oneself a judiciary, basically saying t! hat a se t of bureacrates who have been proven incompetent (by, from numeorus examples, induction lesbian armed forces integrate as postal voters) is a force upon top of a judiciary.
Holy goreng pisang, if a matter as critical as Perak power grab can be brought to several round of court hearing, then how come a set of electoral hurl ladden good proven to be full of issues, is not theme to legal review?
Isn't looking redress from courts a substructure for democracy?
Isn't separation of power - eccentric legislation, execution as good as law have been basic beliefs of democracy, let alone a most appropriate shiok-sendiri-promise-everything-darling-before-sex-find-a-way-out-later democracy?
Then how come a legislation is telling a law not to demeanour during a proven amateurish executive over matters of open interest?
Najib can usually introduce a judgment in a red box to be removed. we am sure all a BN MPs would praise him migthily as good as vote for it.
(By a way, notice a silence from Perkasa when Najib make known which a Bumi share will go eventually? Did a bullet holders mailed all their stocks to Tony Pua?)
Secondly, after dogmatic a electoral hurl is a no-judiciary-area, you! have th is curious square of legislation below
By Lee Wee Tak
The EC may produce another set of electoral hurl (may be different from a gazetted one where a open can examination as good as protest inside of 7 days usually - read my previous post) upon assignment day as good as which hurl is final as good as not disputable.
Malaysians Must Know a TRUTH ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Najib: We value an eccentric judiciary
PUTRAJAYA: The budding apportion pronounced which his administration department department respects as good as understands a need for an eccentric judiciary.
"My administration department department is committed to an eccentric judiciary, which is an necessary part in nation-building," Datuk Seri Najib Razak pronounced in his speech during his maiden visit to a Palace of Justice (POJ), here yesterday, which houses a Federal Court as good as Court of Appeal.
http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/Najib_ISArepealedtomakeMalaysiabestdemocracy/Article/
Najib: ISA repealed to have Malaysia most appropriate democracy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, he got a really easy thing to do to infer how critical he is with regards to those lofty goals as good as put divided a spook of Perkasa torpedo! ing his previous flagship called NEM (not to discuss a tragic rubbish of tax payers' money succumbing to subcontractor of a little sorts to a domestic party)
Take a demeanour during this territory of Election Act, 1958.
Whoever drafted this square of misapplication is basically telling a law to f@#k off if a concerned tax payer notice something amiss with a electoral roll.
This is a square of legislation by a most appropriate democracy in a world, basically saying which basic democractic right of looking probity from courts is denied.
This is a square of legislation by a administration department department which apply oneself a judiciary, basically saying t! hat a se t of bureacrates who have been proven incompetent (by, from numeorus examples, induction lesbian armed forces integrate as postal voters) is a force upon top of a judiciary.
Holy goreng pisang, if a matter as critical as Perak power grab can be brought to several round of court hearing, then how come a set of electoral hurl ladden good proven to be full of issues, is not theme to legal review?
Isn't looking redress from courts a substructure for democracy?
Isn't separation of power - eccentric legislation, execution as good as law have been basic beliefs of democracy, let alone a most appropriate shiok-sendiri-promise-everything-darling-before-sex-find-a-way-out-later democracy?
Then how come a legislation is telling a law not to demeanour during a proven amateurish executive over matters of open interest?
Najib can usually introduce a judgment in a red box to be removed. we am sure all a BN MPs would praise him migthily as good as vote for it.
(By a way, notice a silence from Perkasa when Najib make known which a Bumi share will go eventually? Did a bullet holders mailed all their stocks to Tony Pua?)
Secondly, after dogmatic a electoral hurl is a no-judiciary-area, you! have th is curious square of legislation below
By Lee Wee Tak
The EC may produce another set of electoral hurl (may be different from a gazetted one where a open can examination as good as protest inside of 7 days usually - read my previous post) upon assignment day as good as which hurl is final as good as not disputable.
Say upon 4th Oct they produced a ultimate supplementary electoral hurl for open scrutiny. By 11th all protests must come in. Let contend upon a same day, a PM decided to call for election as good as set a assignment day upon 18th October. When we read a election act below, it seems which there is zero to stop a EC from amending a electoral hurl which was sealed to open protest upon a 11th.
Wonderful things can happy inside of an unscrutinized window period, use your aptitude with magnanimous doses then.
Najib can also ask to streamline a 2 pieces of legislation as good as safeguard usually 1 set of electoral hurl is accepted. Otherwise, one cannot refrain from wondering what can go upon right until a day of nomination.
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment