'If only EC has implemented a little checks into a complement to countenance a firmness of a data, a errors would have been minimised.'Military spouses blunder: EC blames partner registrars
Joker: When Election Commission emissary chairperson Wan Ahmad Wan Omar pronounced a electoral roll was not 100% clean, he meant it was 99.9999% clean. How laughable.
Isn't there a complement of check as well as change in a EC system? Or is it just 'rubbish in, balderdash out'? What have been those EC staff doing in their office? They do not need to go out as well as register voters, they only have to 'link' a EC's database with a NRD (National Registration Department).
Josephine: EC should stop blaming others for a errors. If only EC has implemented a little checks into a complement to countenance a firmness of a data, a errors would have been minimised.
For a start, a complete EC database (in entertaining format) should be done accessible to Bersih 2.0 or alternative 'legal' choosing watchdog as well as domestic parties. We need to write little programmes to separate by a database to see if a EC interpretation creates sense.
I would adore to see a relapse of voter registration by years, as well as we would want to analyse a electorate by their place of birth. And yes, a series of electorate per postal residence would be engaging too.
As for postal voters, we would run a elementary proof to purge those who have been retirees, who have no business to sojourn as postal voters. At a same time, civilian IC numbers of a postal electorate should be matched opposite a voter database to catch a cheaters.
FairMind: If a troops can have mistakes in stuffing a elementary form how could they ever fly an aircraft or correctly target their artillery.
It seems similar to a EC is relying upon a public to do their job for them. Mistakes after mistakes have been pointed out to a EC as well as still they deny there is something wrong with a complement as well as instead disagree which these have been merely "clerical" mistakes.
Don't a EC do their own vetting upon a accuracy of their inputs or have been they closing one eye in serving their domestic masters?
Bluemountains: There is really an organized fraud, though a EC has not even taken any action opposite those who submitted fraudulent documents. Why? The inaction of a EC has since a rakyat a sense which it is condoning criminal activities.
Anonymous_3e8f: The censure game again. Please, both EC arch as well as emissary chief, we must have collective responsibility. What have been we paid for? Pass a sire when mistakes have been highlighted?
If we cannot accept responsibility, just resign rught away for alternative some-more efficient people to helm a EC.
Hello: All these errors have been coming out in a open thick as well as quick - indeed, these have been not errors though an intentional abuse of a voter electoral rolls.
The EC chairperson as well as emissary chairperson keep putting a censure of these errors upon technical glitches as well as a AROs (assistant registration officers) so often which their credit is now totally suspect.
The accumulation of abuses in a registration of electorate goes to prove which there is consistent stuf! fing of a electoral rolls to a value of Umno-BN. The people in charge of EC have been a ones which should be hold responsible as well as accountable.
D4f: The EC is never wro! ng, it i s always somebody else's mistake.
Kgen: Another shady explanation. How can nineteen identical cases be mistakes? Even if a ARO done a mistake, how can EC list them upon a rolls without verifying their status? This looks some-more similar to organized rascal than supposed mistakes.
Anonymous_3da6: The EC can't censure a AROs for these errors. As we have referred to before, a EC has spent millions of ringgit of our money to buy a computer complement which cannot even flag interpretation entrance errors. What a waste!
It's no make make use of of for EC to discuss it a rakyat to mark a errors for them as well as they will scold them immediately. This is not a right way.
The EC should ask a IT department to write an review programme to separate by their database to mark these errors. It's impossible for a rakyat to check a millions of annals manually in such a reduced time. It's not fair.
The EC database is corrupted as well as not acceptable for make make use of of if an IT review check is not done. Go get an eccentric IT group to do it fast. The rakyat should not concede a current corrupted database to be used for a subsequent GE.
Armageddon: Every time discrepancies highlighted, Wan Ahmad will fast claim it is an blunder by someone alternative than himself. we think a biggest blunder was to designate him as emissary EC chief.
With so most 'glitches', no longer a coincidence
Fear God Not Man: To stop these "glitches", a persons who register a electorate have to take a responsibilities. He or she has to sign upon any voter's registration paper as well as give their IC number.
If any discrepancies have been fo! und, the y have to answer for it as well as be fined as well.
Passing Cloud: As a saying goes - truth dejected to earth, shall rise again. It won't be long prior to all misdeeds committed by a Umno-led BN supervision will be unearthed for all as well as sundry to see. - Malaysiakini
No comments:
Post a Comment