Neither MCA nor Umno "own" Wangsa Maju, if you ask me. YB Wee Choo Keong is a incumbent as good as serving MP for Wangsa Maju. In 2008 he defeated a BN candidate from MCA by a 150-vote majority. It competence have been one of a slimmest margins but if one considers which Wee 1. was not a PKR part of even yet he contested upon their ticket; 2. a DAP hated his guts; as good as 3. he was not PAS-friendly even yet he was born as good as raised in Kelantan, afterwards Wee's victory in Wangsa Maju 5 years ago had defied a odds.
He's been serving a subdivision good as good as a people of Wangsa Maju like him as good as know they can depend upon their MP. In Parliament, Wee has been outspoken as good as is a critic of both BN as good as Pakatan. He even helped lead a cyber campaign which got Najib Razak to reverse a argumentative deal brokered by Khazanah which would have let Air Asia take over Malaysia Airlines, a national carrier.
Yesterday, where a angels from BN dared not thread, Wee questioned both Lim Guan Eng as good as Ambiga S over what needed to be asked. Read a paper slicing below as good as discuss it me if a BN or MCA determined candidate for Wangsa Maju has a gumption to take upon those two?Saturday, April 13, 2013|Last updated during 15:40 PM
Lim told to insist DAP polls fiasco
KEEPING SILENT: He has failed to action sincerely to representatives who were not told of a CEC election, says former MPKUALA LUMPUR: FORMER Wangsa Maju eccentric part of of council Wee ! Choo Keo ng has asked DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng to step brazen as good as insist a partys choosing fiasco.
Wee said Lim had failed to take a necessary steps to action sincerely give justice to all a DAP representatives who were not told of a central executive committee (CEC) elections, especially a 735 Indian representatives who had been demanding for an explanation.
I have come to understand which he is frightened which a Registrar of Societies (RoS) will interview a 735 DAP representatives who were not in formed about a CEC elections upon Dec 15.
We wish to know because he is still demure to benefaction a name list of names of a 753 who did not spin up as good as a 1,823 representatives who were present, said Wee, who is additionally DAPs former DAP national publicity secretary.
He additionally questioned Bersih co-chairman Datuk S. Ambigas upon her silence onregarding a issue as good as for not fortifying a predicament of a over 700 Indian representatives which were upheld over by Lim.
Is his action purify or unwashed in Ambigas eyes? he questioned, adding which Ambiga should issue a open statement if she fully supported his actions.
If RoS systematic which Lim conduct a re-election as good as ask all 735 Indian representatives to be benefaction as good as vote, would Ambiga protest?
Wee said he was assured which Ambiga would criticism a re-election as it would affect Lims position as good as give alternative Indian candidates an opportunity to win.
Meanwhile, In Tampin, a former DAP leader has additionally asked because Ambiga did not take an seductiveness in to investigate DAPs CECs choosing fiasco.
Tan Tuan Tat, who is a former Selangor DAP publicity secretary, was nonplussed which Ambiga, who claimed to champions purify as good as free elections, had never questioned a celebration which often was proud of a competency, comment capability as good as clarity (CAT) practice.
Ambiga is always challengi! ng a Ele ction Commission to be satisfactory as good as just.
So, because didnt she ask DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng about a partys 753 representatives who were denied of a chance to opinion during a partys new CEC election?
Tan was speaking during a dinner assembly with DAP Ladang Regent bend mem bers during Balai Raya Ladang Regent in Gemencheh, here, upon Wednesday.
He felt which if Ambiga was really serious about competency, comment capability as good as transparency, afterwards she should have challenged a DAP to exhibit some-more about a a CECs choosing fiasco.
He said a open should not blamed others if a Registrar of Societies (RoS) decided to de-register a celebration or have it called for a uninformed election, thus not allowing a celebration to make use of a trademark infor a general election.
Do not blame a alternative political parties or their rivals. They should instead demeanour during indicate to a DAP leaders who decided to change a choosing formula after a CEC formula were out as good as claimed which there was a technical glitch by a computer, he added.
A sum of 2,576 DAP representatives should have been benefaction during a choosing to name twenty of a partys CEC members, yet 753 of them did not vote.
Read more:Lim told to insist DAP polls failure - General - New Straits Timeshttp://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/lim-told-to-explain-dap-polls-fiasco-1.253790#ixzz2QOCSuRPz
No comments:
Post a Comment