First, this Deepak claimed he gave RM8 million to Rosmah. The volume kept flourishing given that, for effect.Today, during a press conference, PKR's Rafizi claimed Deepak paid for RM13 millionworth of gems, diamonds as well as jewellery, allegedly for Rosmah.
Now ... RM8 million or RM13 million? What's true as well as what's not?
Likewise, first, Anwar Ibrahim said a Opposition was NOT concerned with this Deepak fella. But today, dropping all pretense,his boy Rafizi went as well as held a press discussion to perpetuate a Deepak-Rosmah during a PKR headquarters!
Opposition still NOT involved, Datuk Seri?
I can go with a inconsistencies as well as "holes" customarily associated with lies (and propaganda) but what's a point? Some people will believe in what they wish to.
Like we people believed in PI Bala's initial statutory declaration (issued during a press discussion together with Anwar as well as other PKR leaders, remember?). The approach we used to believe RPK even when he wrote unbelievable things, similar to when he swore which Rosmah had personally supervised a murdering of Altantuya. And a little of we believed which Rosmah paid for a RM24 million diamond ring even after it was proven which a ring had come in as well as afterwards leave a country. Remember a "shopping debauch in Perth" story by a Australian newspaper? You gullibles embraced a news without disbelief as well as longed for it to be true, even after a journal had admitted its inapplicable designation as well as it was proven which a PM's daughter was not even in Perth during a time.
T he great thing is, ladies as well as gentlemen, a law will always prevail. PI Bala proves to be a very shady impression as well as Altantuya was not even who a Opposition made her out to be. RPK has simplified which he did not actually say Rosmah was there, someone told him she was there! Of march it was a evidence for we people to spin opposite RPK. You conveniently accused him of having sole his essence to a top bidder ..
Despite Anwar's explain which a Opposition was not concerned with Deepak, we see which a opposite is right away true. Just similar to a Opposition was concerned with PI Bala. As for Rafizi, he constructed papers as well as profits which valid Deepak paid for those gems. How did he link them to Rosmah? "I do not see Deepak wearing a jewellery," was his answer.
Well, we do not see your trainer wearing a important Omega watch, Rafizi. Are we trying to tell us something?
It is a recycling of a old perception diversion formed upon undisguised lies as well as half-truths which got Pakatan an rare volume of votes during a 2008 general election. Except which right away instead of PI Bala, they have Deepak as well as instead of RPK, who has turn a liability to Anwar as well as a complete Opposition, they have Rafizi.
Will electorate fall for a same trick, five years on? The most gullible ones among we will, for sure, but given PRU12 many people know better ...
No comments:
Post a Comment