Always consistently inconsistent


But since is no a single articulate about this? Is it loyal which a MAS multi-billion liaison is related to a RM30 billion Forex losses? And since contend which a RM30 billion Forex waste is an aged issue? Yes, it is twenty years old. you agree. But have been not a Sabah as well as Tanjung Kupang air crashes as well as a Jalil Ibrahim attempted attempted attempted murder even comparison than that? Yet you wish me to speak about those issues, which have been even comparison than a RM30 billion Forex waste episode. And a MAS emanate is still current. It is not an aged issue.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
There have been a little readers who have demanded to know since you have not created about this emanate or which issue. They have even mentioned a little of a issues you should be essay about such as a Sabah air crash, a Tanjung Kupang air crash, a Jalil Ibrahim attempted attempted attempted murder in Hong Kong, as well as so on.
Why do they wish me to write about issues of days gone by? And since collect upon these issues in particular?
The answer is simple. These issues would be extremely unlucky to those who travel in a corridors of power. Hence, anything which is unlucky to those who travel in a corridors of energy would be favourable to those in a antithesis who have an effort to be a ones to travel in a corridors of power.
If you were to write about those issues, would this see probity for a victims of a air crashes or for a family of Jalil Ibrahim? Is there anything brand new you can write about, which you do not yet know, or will you merely be rehashing a same aged story, which everyone already knows about anyway?
In short, what do you goal to grasp by me essay about this 'old story' alternative than to e! mbarrass sure people who may have been concerned in those incidences, presumption a little of these people have been still alive?
There is a subject of ground here. You have been a really same people who always subject motive. When Deepak Jaikishan creates his explanation you subject his motive. Why now? What is his motive? When ex-IGP Musa Hassan creates his explanation you subject his motive. Why now? What is his motive?
Motive appears to be during a tip of your list of ten questions. Should which not additionally be what you ask you? Why now? What is your ground in asking me to write about this, which or a other?
When you do write about something which happened in a past as well as by coincidence it concerned someone who was afterwards in a supervision though right away in a opposition, you lament which which is an aged story. You do not wish to review about an aged story. You wish to review about something new.
So, when do you wish to review about an aged story as well as when do you not wish to review about an aged story? You demand which you write about an aged story. And when you do write about an aged story this angers you as well as you pose questions like 'why now?' as well as 'what is your motive?' as well as so on.
You may not have beheld this, since it takes an smart mind to be means to notice it, though you routinely write about something which no a single talks about. And when every man as well as his dog begin articulate or essay about which issue, you lay off a issue. you do not jump onto a bandwagon as well as roar a same thing which others have been screaming.
How most of you had even listened a name Deepak Jaikishan untilMalaysia Todayrevealed which name as well as identified who he is in propinquity to a 'First Family'. Now he is a 'household' name so you do not need to speak about him any longer. Today, people a length as well as extent of Malaysia, have been articulate about him.
How ! most of you had listened about Birkin handbags untilMalaysia Todayrevealed which a First Lady has a pick up of those bags in all a opposite colours? Many people did not even know about a existence of Birkin as well as you gamble most of you compartment currently have not even seen a single 'in a flesh' alternative than a photographs thatMalaysia Todaypublished.
Today, you know about ex-IGP Musa Hassan's links with BK Tan as well as 'Tengku' Goh, a black marketplace bosses. Had you ever listened of BK Tan as well as 'Tengku' Goh before this? AndMalaysia Todaydid not usually have a furious claim of these links, you published 8 Statutory Declarations, dual by black marketplace figures, a single by a IGP's ADC, as well as 5 some-more by serving (not retired) police officers confirming whatMalaysia Todayalleged.
So, yes, today, everyone is deliberating these issues. But you have been means to plead these issues usually becauseMalaysia Todayexposed these issues. If not you would never have known about these issues.
And which was a reason whyMalaysia Todayrevealed these issues. We longed for you to know about these stories. We longed for you to speak about a matter. And right away which you know, as well as right away which you have been articulate about them, our job is done. We can afterwards lay behind as well as concede you to speak about a make a difference as well as afterwards come to your own end as to what you should be you do about it.
Most of a issues being discussed currently came fromMalaysia Today. you admit which a NFC emanate is not ours. That was a single expose which you longed for so you do sometimes skip a single or two. But blank a single or dual out of twenty or 30 is not too bad a track record, though.
But what about a most alternative issues which you raised which no a single seems to be articulate about? For example, you revealed which a MAS multi-billion fiasco i! s relate d to a RM30 billion foreign sell waste of twenty years ago. And you published Tajudin Ramli's Affidavit which he filed in justice as evidence to await our allegation.
Tajudin Ramli filed an Affidavit in court. If he lied in which Affidavit he can be sent to jail. Hence, until as well as unless a justice can prove which he lied (which they did not) afterwards you have to pretence which what he pronounced in which Affidavit is a truth.
Since then, MAS has staid its box with Tajudin Ramli 'out of court'. This gives an sense which Tajudin Ramli's box is strong as well as which MAS realises it may not win. Or maybe MAS is disturbed which if it deduction with this box afterwards a law about what Tajudin Ramli pronounced in his Affidavit might surface. Hence improved they 'kill' this box as well as concede it to go no further.
But since is no a single articulate about this? Is it loyal which a MAS multi-billion liaison is related to a RM30 billion Forex losses? And since contend which a RM30 billion Forex waste is an aged issue? Yes, it is twenty years old. you agree. But have been not a Sabah as well as Tanjung Kupang air crashes as well as a Jalil Ibrahim attempted attempted attempted murder even comparison than that? Yet you wish me to speak about those issues, which have been even comparison than a RM30 billion Forex waste episode. And a MAS emanate is still current. It is not an aged issue.
you have not created anything in this column for a final ten days or so. you thought you would lay behind as well as guard your comments below a news items as well as articles created by others, which you published inMalaysia Today. And a single thing which is really transparent is: you courtesy anything which is not right with this nation as Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's fault. He is to be blamed as well as he contingency be accountable for all a ills facing a country.
In alternative words, a buck stops during a tip man's table.
you can buy that. After all, someone has to take shortcoming when something goes wrong. And a chairman who should take which shortcoming contingency be a tip man.
But afterwards who should take shortcoming when something goes wrong upon a alternative side? The Selangor, Penang, Kelantan as well as Kedah State Governments have come out with sure policies as well as have done sure things which have upset a people. Who contingency take shortcoming for this?
When something goes wrong underneath a Barisan Nasional administration, whether during sovereign or state level, a Prime Minister contingency take a blame. But when something goes wrong underneath a Pakatan Rakyat administration, a Opposition Leader cum Prime Minister-in-Waiting is not to be blamed.
When a Local Council demolishes Hindu temples, Dr Xavier screams sabotage. It is not Pakatan Rakyat's fault. It is not a Advisor to a Selangor State Government cum Opposition Leader's fault. It is sabotage.
What about a confiscation of beer during a 7-Eleven? Is this additionally sabotage? What about a statute per a segregation of males as well as females in a cinema? Is this additionally sabotage?
If all this happened in a Barisan Nasional run state afterwards Najib contingency take a censure as well as Najib contingency renounce since of it. But when it happens in a Pakatan Rakyat run states who should take a censure as well as who should resign?
Today, Selena Tay wrote an essay inFree Malaysia TodaycalledPolitical blockbuster: Dragon vs Dinosaur. In which article, she compared Malaysia's mercantile expansion during a time when Anwar Ibrahim was a Finance Minister from 1992 to 1997 to a time when Najib is Prime Minister from 2009 to 2011.
Basically, what Selena says is which Malaysia achieved improved when Anwar wa! s a Fina nce Minister compared to when Najib is Prime Minister. Note, as well as you repeat, a analysis which Selena did compares Anwar as Finance Minister to Najib as Prime Minister.
Now, when Anwar was Finance Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was a Prime Minister. So, should not Dr Mahathir be credited for a great opening instead of Anwar Ibrahim?
Okay, let us pretence which Dr Mahathir had no palm in this. Let us pretence which it was a Finance Minister, Anwar Ibrahim, who should be credited for this great performance. However, during which same period, 1992 to 1994, Malaysia additionally mislaid RM30 billion 'playing' a Forex market.
So, who is to be blamed for this? Since a great mercantile opening of a nation during a duration when Anwar was a Finance Minister contingency be credited to Anwar, should not Anwar, therefore, additionally take a censure for whatever bad which happened?
In this case, no! The RM30 billion Forex waste have been Dr Mahathir's fault. Dr Mahathir was a Prime Minister so he contingency take all a censure -- usually like Najib, a present Prime Minister, contingency take all a censure for whatever happens to Malaysia today.
Who, therefore, is during error here? Najib is both Finance Minister as well as Prime Minister. When something bad happens to Malaysia you censure Najib. But do you censure him since he is a Prime Minister or since he is a Finance Minister?
If you censure Najib since he is a Prime Minister as well as hence a Prime Minister contingency take all a censure -- as well as hence take all a credit as well -- should not Selena credit Dr Mahathir rsther than than Anwar for Malaysia's great mercantile opening from 1992 to 1997?
Assuming Selena feels which a Finance Minister, Anwar Ibrahim, as well as not a Prime Minister, Dr Mahathir, should be credited for Malaysia's great mercantile opening from 1992 to 1997, afterwards since is Dr Mahathir as well as not Anwar being blamed for! a RM30 billion Forex waste during which same period?
We need to be transparent as to who you put a censure upon -- or give credit to -- for what happens in Malaysia. On a a single palm you contend which a censure contingency go all a way to a top. On a alternative palm you contend which a buck stops during a bottom as well as a tip is not to be blamed. Why do you change a manners as as well as when it suits us?
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: