Will they or won't they demolish that shrine again?


http://www.humanrightspartymalaysia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Copyof20121120_104603_thumb.jpg
Steve Roads
The overpower until now of a Selangor supervision over a drop final week of a Hindu tabernacle inside a residence of Gopikumar in Sepang had most people questioning a frankness of Pakatan Rakyat in protecting eremite rights in a state. The headlines done page a single headlines in a Tamil writings but a Selangor supervision chose to sojourn silent for roughly a week.
In a incident, officers of a Sepang Municipal Council used sledgehammers to demolish a tabernacle built inside a porch. Yesterday, EXCO member Dr. Xavier Jayakumar issued a press matter fortifying a action. In a matter he also said a residence owners did not get central capitulation to set up a structure. Since when was it necessary to get accede to set up a tabernacle in one's own home? As we understand it, it becomes bootleg only when capitulation is not sought for any residence alteration which affects it structurally.
A tabernacle does not in any way affect a make up of a building. An prolongation of Dr. Xavier's motive is which all a hundreds of eremite shrines in a compounds of Chinese homes in Selangor must also face a sledgehammer. They were all built, as well as righteously so, but any need for central sanction.

Also, if which Gopikumar tabernacle was illegal, a Sepang authorities should take a float in all a housing estates in a area as well as destroy a hundreds of extensions as well as modifications which have been built but permission.

It has been reported which Gopikumar's tabernacle has since been rebuilt, in rebuttal of a Municipal order. If a ! Selangor state Government wishes to be credible, its officers should go in as well as demolish a tabernacle again. The subject is, WILL IT?
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: